PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2017 | nr 1(85) | 3--19
Tytuł artykułu

Ecosocionomics as a Sustainability Science

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This paper addresses a general vision of the science of equity and sustainability, which could be called ecosoaonomics. The conflict between economies, ecosystems, and social justice could be reconciled on a consensual platform constructed on the scientific basis. Concurring with Wilson's reasoning, it is argued in this paper that a proposed new platform of knowledge should confirm all the indisputable facts of all branches of science. We definitely reject any form of a win-win, or even win-win- win hypotheses. The three goals: economic efficiency, ecosystem protection, and social fairness are not compatible, they stand rather in opposition one to another . As far as human race occupies and reshapes the only World, there is no choice but to sit down and jointly solve our common problems. Mother Earth feeds humans generously, but only to certain limits of her carrying capacity , which cannot be exceeded. This paper represents a step in the ongoing process of looking for a way how to live within the natural limits, and the limits that were created by humans. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
3--19
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu
  • Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu
Bibliografia
  • Aghion., Howitt P., 2007, Capital, Innovation, and Growth Accounting, "Oxford Review of Economic Policy", Vol. 23, 79- 93.
  • Barret R., Salles M., 1998, On three Classes of Differentiable Inequaity Measures, "International Economic Review", Vol. 39, 611-621.
  • Bonevac D., 2008, Is Sustainability Sustainable?, "Acad Quest", 23, 84-101.
  • Branstrom A., Johansson J., Loeuille N., Kristensen N., Troost T. A., Lambers R. H., Dieckmann U., 2012, Modelling the Ecology and Evolution of Communities: A Review of Past Achievements, Current efforts, and Future Promises, "Evolutionary Ecology Research", 14, 601- 625.
  • Brock W. A., Durlauf S. N., 2001, Discrete Choice with Social Interactions, "Review of Economic Studies", 68, 235- 260.
  • Burnst T. R., 2012, The Sustainability Revolution: A Societal Paradigm Shift, "Sustainability", 4, 1118- 1134.
  • Campbell S., 1996, Green Cities, Growing Cities, Just Cities?, "Urban Planning and the Contradictions of Sustainable Development. Journal of the American Planning Association", 62(3), 296-312.
  • Chichilinsky G., 2009, Avoiding Extinction: Equal Treatment of the Present and the Future, Economics, Vol. 3, 1-25, www.economics-ejournal.org (accessed 30.04.2016).
  • Conelly S. 2007, Mapping Sustainable Development as a Contested Concept, "Local Environment", Vol. 12, No. 3, 259-278.
  • Costanza R., 2003, A Vision of the Future of Science: Reinterpreting the Study of Humans and the Rest of Nature, "Futures", 35, 651-671.
  • Costanza R., 2003, Social Goals and the Valuation of Natural Capital, "Environmental Monitoring and Assessment", 86, 19-28.
  • Daly H., 1968, On Economics as a Life Science, "Journal of Political Economy", Vol. 3, No. 3, 392- 406.
  • Daly H., 2005, Economics in a Full World, "Scientific American", September.
  • Daly H., 2007, Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development. Selected essays of Herman Daly, Edward Elgar.
  • Dequech D., 2007, Neoclassical, Mainstream, Orthodox, and Heterodox Economics, Vol. 30. No. 2, 279-302.
  • Ekins P., 1993, 'Limits to Growth' and Sustainable Development': Grappling with Ecological Realities, "Ecological Economics", 8, 269-288.
  • Erikson R., Andersson J. O., 2010, Elements of Ecological Economics, Routledge.
  • Erreygers G., 2009, Hotelling, Rawls, Solow: How Exhaustible Resources Came to Be Integrated into the Neoclassical Growth Model, "History of Political Economy", 41, 264-282.
  • Esping-Andersen G., 1990, Social Foundations ofPost-Industrial Economics, Oxford University Press.
  • Figuieres Ch., Tidball M., 2012, Sustainable Exploitation of a Natural Resource: A Satisfying use of Chichilinsky's Criterion, "Econ Theory", 49243-265.
  • Fuks M., 2012, Reflections on the Paradigm of Ecological Economicsfor Environmental Management, "Estudos Avancados", 26(74), 105- 118.
  • Gowdy J., Mesner S., 1998, The Evolution of Georgescu-Roegen's Bioeconomics, "Review of Social Ecology", 2, 137- 156.
  • Kristensen N. P., Gabric A., Bradock R., Cropp R., 2003, Is Maximizing Resilience Compatible with Established Ecological GoalFunction"Ecological Modelling", 169, 6171.
  • Lawson T., 2005, The Nature of Heterodox Economics, "Cambridge Journal of Economics", 8, 1-23.
  • Lele S., 1991, Sustainable Development: A CnticalReview, "World Development", 19(6), 607- 621.
  • Mebratu D., 1998, Sustainability and Sustainable Development: Historical and Conceptual Review, "Environ Impact Asses Rev", 18, 493-520.
  • Mitman G., 2006, Where Ecology, Nature, and Politics Meet: Reclaiming The Death of Nature, "Isis", 97, 496-504.
  • Nagpal T., Foltz Ch., 1995, Choosing our Future. Vision of a Sustainable World, World Research Institute.
  • Ostasiewicz K., 2014, Impact of Outliers on Inequality Measures- A Comparison between Polish Voivodships, "Silesian Statistical Review", 12(18), 105-120.
  • Ostasiewicz K., Magnuszewski P., 2011, The Concept of Resilience and its Application to a Certain Socio-EconimicalModel, "Pragmata Tes Oikonomias", No. IV, 203-216.
  • Ostasiewicz W., 2016, Metabometria, "Śląski Przegląd Statystyczny", 14(20), 145-183.
  • Ostasiewicz K., Ostasiewicz W., 2014,Towards the Science of Equity and Sustainability, http://www.amse.ue.wroc.pl/proceedings.html (accessed: 30.04.2016).
  • Padovan D., 2000, The Concept of SocialMetabolizm in Classical Sociology, "Revista Theomai", No 2, http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=12400203 (accessed: 30.04.2016).
  • Pearce T., 2010, "A great Complication of Circumstances" - Darwin and the economy of nature, "Journal of the History of Biology", 43, 493-528.
  • Pezzey J. C. V., Toman M. A., 2002, The Economics of Sustainability: A Review of Journal Articks, Discussion Paper 02-03, RESOURCES for the Future, http:// www.rff.org (accessed: 30.04.2016).
  • Singer P., 2004, One World, the Ethics of Globalization, Nota Bene, Yale.
  • Soderbaum P., 2014, The Role of Economics and Democracy in Institutional Change for Sustainability, Sustainability , 6, 2755- 2765.
  • Wilson E. O. 1998, Consilience: the Unity of Knowledge, Knopf, New York.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171514820

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.