Możliwości adaptacji metodyki ewaluacji ex ante do szacowania potencjału kierunków badań naukowych, technologii i obszarów technologicznych

• Autorzy: Anna Rogut , Bogdan Piasecki

Warianty tytułu

Adaptability of the Ex Ante Evaluation Methodology to the Estimation of the Potential of the Research, Technology and Technological Areas

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

W dalszej części artykuł przedstawia możliwości adaptacji metodyki ewaluacji ex ante do konstrukcji mechanizmu szacowania potencjału kierunków badań naukowych, technologii i obszarów technologicznych. (fragment tekstu)

EN

The potential of directions of scientific studies, technology and technological areas means a capacity to generate increase in the dynamics of economic development, in case of scientific studies mainly in a long-term perspective. The potential defined in this way can be estimated using various econometric models. However, the economic models are subject to a high level of uncertainty, and they require a verification mechanism. An ex ante evaluation, and a technology evaluation methodology in particular, can provide the basis for such a mechanism. This paper demonstrates the way of using this methodology to assess the potential of directions of scientific studies, technology and technological areas as well as using it to verify the selection of smart specialization areas. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Inteligentna specjalizacja; Technologia

EN

Smart specialization; Technology

• Czasopismo: Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie
• Rocznik: 2017
• Numer: t. 18, z. 12, cz. 2 Globalne i regionalne wyzwania przedsiębiorczości i innowacyjności
• Strony: 125--144

Twórcy

autor

Anna Rogut

• Społeczna Akademia Nauk

autor

Bogdan Piasecki

• Społeczna Akademia Nauk

Bibliografia

• Acemoglu D., Aghion P., Zilibotti F. (2006), Distance to frontier, selection, and economic growth, "Journal of the European Economic Association" z. 4 (1), ss. 37-74.
• Ahn S-J., Lee J.B. (2013), Ex ante evaluation framework for R&D program: Exercises from Korea Government, "International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology", z. 4(1), ss. 117-121.
• Amara N., Landry R., Becheikh N., Ouimet M. (2004), Radical innovations in traditional manufacturing industries, [online] www2.druid.dk/conferences/viewpaper.php?id=2359&cf=16, dostęp: 15 maja 2014.
• Ancarani V. (2009), Policies at the technological frontier. Europe and us: The follower's trap or divergent trajectories?, [online] www.allacademic.com/one/isa/isa09/index.php?cmd=isa09_search&offset=0&limit=5&multi_search_search_mode=publication&multi_search_publication_fulltext_mod=fulltext&textfield_submit=true&search_module=multi_search&search=Search&search_field=title_idx&fulltext_search=Policies+at+the+Technological+Frontier+in+Europe+-+Trap+of+the+Follower+or+Divergent+Trajectories, dostęp: 15 maja 2014.
• Åstebro T. (2003), Key success factors for R&D project commercialization, [online] http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=D84F7EE30642F24A65DFA95884026C26?doi=10.1.1.122.4818&rep=rep1&type=pdf, dostęp: 15 maja 2014.
• Athey G., Nathan M., Webber C. (2007), What role do cities play in innovation, and to what extent do we need city-based innovation policies and approches?, "NESTA Working Paper" 01/June.
• Bakouros Y. (2000), Technology evaluation, [online] http://www.adi.pt/docs/innoregio_techn_evaluation.pdf, dostęp: 19 czerwca 2014.
• Bandarian R. (2007), Evaluation of commercial potential of a new technology at the early stage of development with fuzzy logic, "Journal of Technology Management & Innovation", z. 2(4), ss. 73-85.
• Barysienė J. (2012), A multi-criteria evaluation of container terminal technologies applying the Copras-g method, "Transport", z. 27(4), ss. 364-372.
• Bozeman J., Melkers J. (red.) (1993), Evaluating R&D impacts: Methods and practices, Springer Science+Business Media, New York.
• Brousselle A., Champagne F. (2011), Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis, "Evaluation and Program Planning", z. 34, ss. 69-78.
• Capello R., Caragliu A., Nijkamp P. (2009), Territorial Capital and Regional Growth: Increasing Returns in Cognitive Knowledge Use, [online] www.tinbergen.nl/discussionpapers/09059.pdf, dostęp: 23 kwietnia 2016.
• Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A. (1990), Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation, "Administrative Science Quarterly", z. 35 (1), ss. 128-152.
• Discontools Project (2012a), A review of existing approaches to the identification, evaluation and selection of New Technologies which could be applied to the Animal Health sector, [online] www.discontools.eu/upl/1/default/doc/RevWP4MethoFinal20120105.pdf, dostęp: 2 maja 2017.
• Discontools Project (2012b), A methodology for identification and evaluation of New Technologies in Animal Health, [online] www.discontools.eu/Workgroups/Group/30, dostęp: 2 maja 2017.
• European Commission (2004), Evaluating EU activities. A practical guide for the Commission services, European Communities, Luxembourg.
• European Commission (2006), Constructing regional advantage: principles - perspectives - policies, [online] www.dime-eu.org/files/active/0/regional_advantage_FINAL.pdf, 2 maja 2017.
• European Commission (2008), Przewodnik do analizy kosztów i korzyści projektów inwestycyjnych. Fundusze strukturalne, Fundusz Spójności oraz Instrument Przedakcesyjny. Raport końcowy, [online] https://poig.parp.gov.pl/files/74/108/255/3948.pdf, dostęp: 14 marca 2016.
• European Commission (2014), Guidance on Ex Ante Conditionalities for the European Structural and Investment Funds. Part II, [online] http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/2014/eac_guidance_esif_part2_en.pdf, dostęp: 5 maja 2017.
• European Commission (2017), Strengthening Innovation in Europe's Regions: Strategies for resilient, inclusive and sustainable growth, COM(2017) 376 final.
• Fu X. (2007), Foreign direct investment, absorptive capacity and regional innovation capabilities: Evidence from China, [online] www.oecd.org/dataoecd/44/23/40306798.pdf, dostęp: 3 maja 2017.
• Hall B.H., Khan B. (2003), Adoption of new technology, "NBER Working Paper Series", National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.
• Hollanders H., Es-Sadki N. (2017), Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2017, European Union.
• Hua K., Noble T.J., Sato Z. (2007), Marginal analysis guided technology evaluation and selection, www.icpr19.cl/mswl/Papers/224.pdf, dostęp: 12 maja 2017.
• Kellogg Foundation (2004). Logic model development guide, W.K. Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek.
• Lengrand L. & Associés (2006), Smart innovation: A Practical Guide to Evaluating Innovation Programmes, ECSC-EC-EAEC, Brussels-Luxembourg.
• Lewis-Beck M.S., Bryman A., Futing Liao T. (2004), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412950589.n1031, dostęp: 13 kwietnia 2017.
• Mahroum S., Huggins R., Clayton N., Pain K., Taylor P. (2008), Innovation by Adoption. Measuring and mapping absorptive capacity in UK nations and regions, NESTA, London.
• McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R. (2011), Smart specialisation, regional growth and applications to EU cohesion policy, [online] http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/docs/s3_mccann_ortega.pdf, dostęp 17 maja 2017.
• Ministerstwo Rozwoju (2016), Przegląd regionalny Polski 2016, [online] https://www.mr.gov.pl/strony/zadania/polityka-rozwoju-kraju/zarzadzanie-rozwojem-kraju/krajowe-obserwatorium-terytorialne/raporty-opracowania-i-ekspertyzy/, dostep: 5 maja 2017.
• Mitropoulos P., Tatum C.B. (2000), Forces driving adoption of new information technologies, "Journal of Construction Engineering and Management", z. 126(5), ss. 340-348.
• Muir R. (1998), Managing technology for profit, [online] http://www.pepvc.com/menu/ivmanagetech.htm, dostęp: 9 maja 2017.
• OECD (2001), Territorial outlook. Territorial economy, OECD Publishing, Paris.
• Rogut A., Piasecki B. (2011), Podręcznik ewaluatora projektów foresight, Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego, Warszawa.
• Roper S., Hewitt-Dundas N., Love J.H. (2004), An ex ante evaluation framework for the regional benefits of publicly supported R&D projects, "Research Policy" z. 33, ss. 487-509.
• Ruegg R., Feller I. (2003), A toolkit for evaluating public R&D investment models, methods, and findings from ATP's first decade, U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, Natonal Institute of Standards and Technology.
• Ruegg R., Jordan G. (2007), Overview of evaluation methods for R&D programs. A directory of evaluation methods relevant to technology development programs, U.S. Department of Energy.
• Todorova G., Durisin B. (2003), The concept and the reconceptualisation of absorptive capacity: Recognizing the value, "Working Paper" z. 95/03, SDA Bocconi.
• van den Bosch F.A.J., van Wijk R., Volberda H.W. (2003), Absorptive capacity: Antecedents, models and outcomes, [online] http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=411675, dostęp: 12 kwietnia 2014.
• Vandenbussche J., Aghion P., Meghir C. (2004), Distance to Technological Frontier and Composition of Human Capital, [online] www.merit.unimaas.nl/workshop/aghion.pdf, dostęp: 12 kwietnia 2014.
• World Bank Group (2015), W kierunku innowacyjnej Polski: Proces przedsiębiorczego odkrywania i analiza potrzeb przedsiębiorstw w Polsce, [online] http://www.worldbank.org/pl/country/poland/publication/entrepreneurial-discovery-process-poland, dostęp: 9 maja 2017.