Analiza efektywności działań innowacyjnych wykorzystujących fundusze UE na przykładzie polskich przedsiębiorstw sektora MŚP : koncepcja zastosowania metody ROI2

• Autorzy: Tomasz Norek

Warianty tytułu

Analysis of the Efficiency of Innovation Projects Supported by the EU Funds - a Case Study of Polish SME Companies : the Concept of Using the ROI2 Method

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Podstawowym celem niniejszego artykułu jest próba oceny efektywności działań innowacyjnych firm sektora MŚP ze względu na formę finansowania działalności innowacyjnej. (fragment tekstu)

EN

In the modern economy, innovation is seen as a key factor in creating a competitive advantage and growth of enterprises. The ability to implement effective innovative projects is extremely important for entrepreneurs. The importance of innovation is reflected in EU policies which provide large funds for member states on the development of innovation. Despite the large interventions based on EU funds, innovativeness of the Polish economy is relatively low (compared with other UE countries and world leaders of innovation). This situation is particularly evident in relation to the SME sector companies. This dichotomy is an important subject of research in the field of economy the SME sector, and the applications can make a significant contribution to the strategy of building aid policy in the field of innovation financing. The purpose of this article is to analyze the efficiency of the use of EU funds for the development of innovation in the Polish SME sector. The author puts the research hypothesis: (H1) The use of EU funds does not significantly increase the performance of innovation in the SME sector. In order to verify the hypothesis author conducted to compare the effects of innovative activity of SMEs include the division of the company that benefited from EU funds for the development of innovation and the company that not exploited EU funds. The author used the method of the survey. The study was conducted in the years 2012-2016 on a sample of 600 SME sector. In addition, author conducted a critical analysis of the literature of the subject and has used commonly available statistics (published by the Polish statistical office, Eurostat). (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Innowacje; Innowacyjność; Małe i średnie przedsiębiorstwa; Fundusze unijne

EN

Innovations; Innovative character; Small business; EU funds

• Czasopismo: Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie
• Rocznik: 2017
• Numer: t. 18, z. 12, cz. 2 Globalne i regionalne wyzwania przedsiębiorczości i innowacyjności
• Strony: 317--332

Twórcy

autor

Tomasz Norek

• Uniwersytet Szczeciński

Bibliografia

• Baruk J. (2017), Powszechność wdrażania innowacji w przedsiębiorstwach funkcjonujących w państwach członkowskich UE. Problemy Jakości, 49(1).
• Bijańska J. (2011), Analiza i ocena ekonomicznej efektywności innowacji, "Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej", Seria: "Organizacja i Zarządzanie", z. 56, nr kol. 1845.
• Brzeziński M. (red.) (2001), Zarządzanie innowacjami technicznymi i organizacyjnymi, Difin, Warszawa.
• Camagni R., Capello R. (2013), Regional Innovation Patterns and the EU Regional Policy Reform: Toward Smart Innovation Policies, "Growth Change", 44.
• Carayannis E., Grigoroudis E.J. (2014), Linking innovation, productivity, and competitiveness: implications for policy and practice, "The Journal of Technology Transfer", Vol. 39, Issue 2.
• Chaney P.K., Devinney T.M., Winer R.S. (1991), The Impact of New Product Introductions on the Market Value of Firms, "Journal of Business", Vol. 64.
• Crumpton M.A. (2012), Innovation and entrepreneurship, "The Bottom Line", Vol. 25, Issue 3.
• Debreu G. (1951), The Coefficient of Resource Utilization, "Econometrica", Vol. 19, No. 3.
• Dibrell C., Davis P., Craig J. (2008), Fuelling innovation through information technology in SMEs, "Journal of Small Business Management", Vol. 46, No. 2.
• Drake P., Miles P., Sakkab N. i in. (2006), Maximizing Return on Innovation Investment, "Research-Technology Management", Vol. 49, No. 6.
• Epstein L.G., Yatchew A.J. (1985), Non-parametric hypothesis testing procedures and applications to demand analysis, "Journal of Econometrics", Vol. 30, Issue 1, ISSN 0304-4076.
• Farinha L., Ferreira J., Gouveia, B.J. (2016), Networks of Innovation and Competitiveness: A Triple Helix Case Study.
• Farrell M.J. (1957), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, "Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (A, general)", Vol. 120.
• Filipiak B.Z. (2014), Nowa logika Unii Europejskiej w obszarze wsparcia finansowego polepszania innowacyjności małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw, Optimum. Studia Ekonomiczne.
• Foreman-Peck J. (2013), Effectiveness and efficiency of SME innovation policy, "Small Business Economics", Vol. 41, Issue 1.
• Forycki Z. (2016), Metody pomiaru efektywności projektów innowacyjnych, "Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu" ("Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics"), Nr 418.
• Geroski P., Machin S., van Reenen J. (1993), The Profitability of Innovating Firms, "Rand Journal of Economics", Vol. 24, Issue 2.
• Gorzelak G. (2014), Wykorzystanie środków Unii Europejskiej dla rozwoju kraju - wstępne analizy, "Studia Regionalne i Lokalne", 15(57).
• Hollander H., Es-Sadki N., Kanerva M. (2016), European Innovation Scoreboard 2016, Maastricht University (Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology - MERIT).
• Hollander M., Wolfe D.A., Chicken E. (2014), Nonparametric Statistical Methods, 3rd Edition, Willy.
• Hollanders H., Esser F.C. (2007), Measuring Innovation Efficiency, "INNO-Metrics Thematic Paper", December.
• http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oslomanualguidelinesforcollectingandinterpretinginnovationdata3rdedition.htm
• Instytut Badań Strukturalnych (2010), Ocena wpływu polityki spójności na wzrost konkurencyjności i innowacyjności polskich przedsiębiorstw i gospodarki, Warszawa.
• Jaki A. (2011), Paradygmat efektywności w zarządzaniu, "Przegląd Organizacji" nr 4.
• Janger J., Schubert T., Andries P. i in. (2016), The EU 2020 innovation indicator: A step forward in measuring innovation outputs and outcomes?, "Research Policy", Vol. 46, Issue 1.
• Kandybin A. (2009), Which Innovation Efforts Will Pay?, "Managing Innovation, MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT Review".
• Kandybin A., Kihn M. (2004), Raising Your Return on Innovation Investment. Each company has an intrinsic innovation effectiveness curve. Here are three ways to lift IT. Strategy+business, Issue 35 Special Report.
• Karganov S. (2008), Bariery obowiązującej teorii oceny efektywności ekonomicznej i drogi ich przezwyciężenia, [w:] Tendencje innowacyjnego rozwoju polskich przedsiębiorstw, Instytut Wiedzy i Innowacji, Warszawa.
• Kasperkiewicz W. (2016), Wyzwanie innowacyjne dla gospodarek Unii Europejskiej w świetle Strategii Europa 2020, "Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne", 99.
• Koopmans T.C. (1951), An Analysis of Production as Efficient Combination of Activities. In: Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation [in:] T.C. Koopmans (red.), Cowles Commission for Research in Economics, Monograph no. 13, New York.
• Kotsemir M. (2013), Measuring National Innovation Systems Efficieny - a review of DEA Approach, "Basic Research Program Working Paper", National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow.
• Kreiser P.M., Marino L.D., Kuratko D.F. (2013), Disaggregating entrepreneurial orientation: the non-linear impact of innovativeness, proactiveness and risk-taking on SME performance, "Small Business Economics", Vol. 40, Issue 2.
• Low D., Chapman, R. (2007), Inter-relationships between innovation and market orientation of SMEs, "Management Research News", Vol. 30, No. 12.
• Łobacz K., Głodek P. (2015), Development of Competitive Advantage of Small Innovative Firm-How to Model Business Advice Influence within the Process?, "Procedia Economics and Finance", No 23.
• Marr B. (2012), Key Performance Indicators (KPI): The 75 measures every manager needs to know, Pearson UK.
• McFadzean E., O'Loughlin A., Shaw E. (2005), Corporate entrepreneurship and innovation part 1: the missing link, "European Journal of Innovation Management", Vol. 8, Issue 3.
• PARP (2016), Raport o stanie sektora MSP, Warszawa.
• Radas S., Božić L. (2009), The antecedents of SME innovativeness in an emerging transition economy, "Technovation", Vol. 29, Issues 6-7.
• Rosebusch N., Brinckmann J., Bausch A. (2009), Is New Better? A meta-Analysis of Innovation Performance Relationship in SME, American Academy of Management Conference, Chicago.
• Rybiński K. (2011), Go Global! Raport o innowacyjności polskiej gospodarki, Warszawa: raport zespołu ekspertów Uczelni Vistula.
• Salvato C., Lassini U., Wiklund J. (2007), Dynamics of external growth in SMEs: Process of model acquisition capabilities emergence, "Schmalebach Business Review", Vol. 59, No 3.
• Sawang S., Unsworth K., Sorbello T. (2012), An exploratory study of innovation effectiveness measurement in australian and thai SMEs, "International Journal of Organisational Behaviour", Vol. 12 (1).
• Skrzypek E. (2012), Efektywność ekonomiczna jako ważny czynnik sukcesu organizacji, Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, Vol. 262.
• Stoner J., Wankel, C. (1986), Management, Prentice Hall International, Engelwood Cliffs.
• Thuriaux-Aleman B., Eagar R., Johansson A. (2013), Getting a Better Return on Your Innovation Investment; Results of the 8th Arthur D. Little Global Innovation Excellence Study, "Technology and Innovation Management", Arthur D. Little.
• Varian H.R. (1982), Non-parametric methods in demand analysis, "Economics Letters", Vol. 9, Issue 1.
• West J., Bogers M. (2014), Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation, "Journal of Product Innovation Management", Vol. 31.
• Zhao F. (2005), Exploring the synergy between entrepreneurship and innovation, "International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research", Vol. 11, Issue 1.