Concept of the Organization Process Maturity Assessment

• Autorzy: Piotr Sliż
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Aim/purpose - The aim of this article is to present the concept of a multicriteria model of process maturity assessment (MMPM), which allows to assess the degree of implementation of process solutions with respect to three dimensions: short-term, long-term and systemic. Design/methodology/approach - The characteristics of the model presented in the article was preceded by a review of the literature and the analysis of secondary research related to the assessment of the degree of implementation of elements of the process approach in management. Findings - As a result of the review of the literature and the analysis of secondary re-search, a thesis was formulated that quantitative research using the existing methodolo-gies for identifying the implementation of a process approach in management is insuffi-cient in the precise assessment of the organization's process maturity. This means that they should be extended to include qualitative research. The solution to this problem may be the use of a multidimensional model of process maturity assessment of the organization. Research implications/limitations - The application of MMPM makes it possible to assess the degree of implementation of the process approach elements using the opinion poll method. This means that the results may be subject to random or non-random errors, depending on the selection technique of the research sample. At this point, it should also be emphasized that in order to provide a precision assessment of process maturity using the MMPM, the questions in the questionnaire should be adapted to the specifics of the area under examination. Originality/value/contribution - The scope of this article fills in the research gap that exists in terms of assessing the process maturity of the organization in the long run, understood as defining the direction of development, stagnation or atrophy of implementation of process solutions in the organization. The concept of the MMPM presented in the article makes it possible to assess process maturity in three dimensions: short-term, long-term and system-based. In addition, the structure of the model enables the reconfiguration of the research questionnaire with questions of a self-reinforcing character by the respondent to questions, enabling the assessment of the level of maturity on the basis of symptoms.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Process management; Processing management; Multi-equation models

PL

Zarządzanie procesami; Zarządzanie procesowe; Modele wielorównaniowe

• Czasopismo: Journal of Economics & Management / University of Economics in Katowice
• Rocznik: 2018
• Numer: nr 33
• Strony: 80--95

Twórcy

autor

Piotr Sliż

• Uniwersytet Gdański

Bibliografia

• Becker, J., Knackstedt, R., & Pöppelbuß, J. (2009). Developing maturity models for IT management - a procedure model and its application. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1(3), 213-222. doi: 10.1007/11576-009-0167-9
• Biazzo, S., & Bernardi, G. (2003). Process management practices and quality systems standards: Risks and opportunities of the new ISO 9001 certification. Business Process Management Journal, 9(2), 149-169. doi: 10.1108/14637150310468371
• de Bruin, T., Rosemann, M., Freeze, R., & Kulkarni, U. (2005). Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model. In B. Campbell, J. Underwood, & D. Bunker (Eds.), Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS), Sydney, Australia (pp. 8-19). Sydney: Australasian Chapter of the Association for Information Systems.
• Cyfert, S. (2009). Metody podnoszenia efektywności procesów w polskich przedsiębiorstwach- ograniczenia i kierunki zmian [Methods of process improvement applied in polish enterprises - limitations and directions of developing]. Research Papers of the Wroclaw University of Economics, 52, 162-169.
• Dangel, J. W. (1994). Business Process Reengineering: radikale Umgestaltung von Geschaftsprozessen. Management Zeitschrift Industrielle Organisation, 63(5), 31-33.
• Fisher, D. M. (2004). The business process maturity model: A practical approach for identifying opportunities for optimization. Business Process Trends, 9(4), 11-15.
• Flieger, M. (2016). Zarządzanie procesowe w urzędach gmin. Model adaptacji kryteriów dojrzałości procesowej [Process management in the local offices. Model of adaptation of the process maturity criteria]. Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University Press.
• Grajewski, P. (2007). Organizacja procesowa [A process-oriented organization]. Warszawa: PWE.
• Grajewski, P. (2012). Procesowe zarządzanie organizacją [A process-oriented organisational management]. Warszawa: PWE.
• Grajewski, P. (2016). Organizacja procesowa [A process-oriented organization] (2nd ed.). Warszawa: PWE.
• Hammer, M. (2007). The process audit. Harvard Business Review, 85(4), 111-143.
• Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The discipline of teams. Harvard Business Press, 71(2), 111-120.
• Lee, J., Lee, D., & Kang, S. (2007). An overview of the business process maturity model (BPMM). In H. Shan, & J. China (Eds.), Advances in web and network technologies, and information management (Vol. 4537, pp. 384-395). Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-72909-9_42
• Maull, R. S., Tranfield, D. R., & Maull, W. (2003). Factors characterising the maturity of BPR programmes. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(6), 596-624. doi: 10.1108/01443570310476645
• McCormack, K., Willems, J., van den Bergh, J., Deschoolmeester, D., Willaert, P., Stemberger, M. I., Skrinjar, R., Trkman, P., Ladeira, M. B., Valadares de Oliveira, M. P., Vuksic, V. B., & Vlahovic, N. (2009). A global investigation of key turning points in business process maturity. Business Process Management Journal, 15(5), 792-815. doi: 10.1108/14637150910987946
• Pöppelbuß, J., & Röglinger, M. (2011, June). What makes a useful maturity model? A framework of general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management. Proceedings of the Nineteenth European Conference on Information Systems University of Münster, Germany. Retrieved from https://fim-rc.de/Paperbibliothek/Veroeffentlicht/327/wi-327.pdf
• Rohloff, M. (2009). Case study and maturity model for business process management implementation. In U. Dayal, J. Eder, J. Koehler, & H. A. Reijers (Eds.), Business Process Management. BPM 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 5701, pp. 128-142). Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-03848-8_10
• Röglinger, M., Pöppelbuß, J., & Becker, J. (2012). Maturity models in business process management. Business Process Management Journal, 18(2), 328-346. doi: 10.1108/ 14637151211225225
• Rosemann, M., & de Bruin, T. (2005, May). Towards a business process management maturity model. In D. Bartmann, F. Rajola, J. Kallinikos, D. Avison, R. Winter, P. Ein-Dor, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Information Systems, Regensburg, Germany. Retrieved from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/ 25194/1/25194_rosemann_2006001488.pdf
• Rosemann, M., de Bruin, T., & Power, B. (2006) A model to measure business process management and improve performance. In J. Jeston, & J. Nelis (Eds.), Business process management (Vol. 27, pp. 299-315). London: Butterworth-Heinemann.
• Sliż, P. (2016a). Dojrzałość procesowa organizacji - wyniki badań empirycznych [Business process maturity - report of empirical research]. Research Papers of the Wroclaw University of Economics, 421, 530-532.
• Sliż, P. (2016b). Rola dojrzałości multiprocesowej sieci w kształtowaniu relacji międzyorganizacyjnych - wyniki badań empirycznych [The role of multiprocess maturity in establishing interorganizational relations - report of empirical studies]. Journal of Management and Finance, 14(2), 325-336.
• Trocki, M. (2004). Standaryzacja procesów a zarządzanie procesowe [Standardization of processes and process management]. In M. Romanowska, & M. Trocki (Eds.), Podejście procesowe w zarządzaniu [Process approach in management] (Vol. 1). Warsaw: Warsaw School of Economics.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.22367/jem.2018.33.05