PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2017 | nr 24 | 74--86
Tytuł artykułu

Leaving the ivory tower through scientific innovation co-operative research - a social experiment in research on alternative agro-food networks

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The paper presents a participatory pattern of conducting research for social science. A few projects based on the idea of 'co-operative research' have been funded within the 7th EU Framework Programme. Among them was the project "Facilitating Alternative Agro-Food Networks - Stakeholder Perspective on Research Needs" (FAAN). One of its goals was to test the potential of the co-operative approach in social research practice. This paper aims to present and discuss the experiences from the project to reflect upon the usefulness of co-operative research as a scientific innovation and a new research paradigm, as well as to propose its reframing based on the results of the project. The article ends with practical recommendations concerning management or research projects in a co-operative manner, stressing the need of competencies for team leaders in micro-management of heterogeneous research teams.(original abstract)
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
74--86
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Nicolaus Copernicus University, Poland
  • Nicolaus Copernicus University, Poland
  • Interdisciplinary Research Centre for Technology, Work and Culture, Austria
Bibliografia
  • A. Stirling, Opening Up'' and Closing Down'': Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology, Science Technology Human Values 33 (2008) 262-94.
  • D. Dickson, Science and Its Public: The Need for a'Third Way', Social Studies of Science 30 (2000) 917-23.
  • J. Wilsdon, R. Willis, See-through Science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream, Demos, London, 2004.
  • U. Felt, B. Wynne. 2007, Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously, Expert Group on Science and Governance, Brussels, European Commission D-G Research, Science Economy and Society Directorate, EUR 22700. (2007)
  • P. Scott, M. Gibbons, H. Nowotny, Re-Thinking Science, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2001.
  • P. Weingart, Die Stunde der Wahrheit?: Zum Verhaltnis der Wissenschaft zu Politik, Wirtschaft und Medien in der Wissensgesellschaft. Velbruck Wiss, Weilerswist 2005.
  • P. Weingart, Wissen als Ware?: Zum Verhaltnis von Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft, Wunschmaschine Wissenschaft 2006.
  • S. O. Funtowicz, J. Ravetz, Science for the post-normal age, Futures 25 (1993) 739-755.
  • M. Gibbons, C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, M. Trow, The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Sage, London. 1994.
  • T. J. Klein, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, R. Haberli, A.Bill, R. W. Scholz, and M.Welti. Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society: An Effective Way for Managing Complexity. Birkhauser. 2012.
  • H. Hirsch, Ch. Pohl, and M. Scheringer. Methodology of transdisciplinary research, w: G. H. Hadorn (Ed.): Unity of Knowledge (in Transdisciplinary Research for Sustainability). Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems, EOLSS Publishers, Oxford, 2002.
  • European Commission. 2014. Horizon 2020 in brief - The EU Framework Programme for Research & Innovation. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/sites/horizon2020/files/H2020 inBrief EN FinalBAT.pdf
  • A. Klaey, A. B. Zimmermann, F. Schneider, Rethinking science for sustainable development: Reflexive interaction for a paradigm transformation, Futures 65 (2015) 72-85.
  • European Commission. 2010. "Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union". Official Journal of the European Union, 53(C83): 13- 46.
  • European Commission. 2012. Responsible Research and Innovation. Europe's ability to respond to societal challenges. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/responsible-research-and-innovation- leaflet_en.pdf.
  • A. Irwin, STS Perspectives on Scientific Governance, w: E. J. Hackett, , O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, J. Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies, Cambridge, MIT, Cambridge Mass, 2008, pp. 583-607
  • F. Fischer, Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge, Duke University Press Books, Durham, 2000.
  • G. Rowe, L.J. Frewer, Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation, Science, technology & human values 3 (2000).
  • R. von Schomberg, A Vision of Responsible Innovation, Responsible Innovation, London, 2013, pp. 51-74.
  • R. Owen, J. Stilgoe, P. Macnaghten, M. Gorman, E. Fisher, D. Guston, A Framework for Responsible Innovation. Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society, 2013, pp. 27-50.
  • N. S. Mauthner, A. Doucet, Knowledge Once Divided Can Be Hard to Put Together Again' An Epistemological Critique of Collaborative and Team-Based Research Practices, Sociology 42 (2008), 971-985.
  • S. Fuller, The Governance of Science: Ideology and the Future of the Open Society, Buckingham, Open University Press, Philadelphia, 2000.
  • A. Stirling, From Science and Society to Science in Society. Towards a framework for 'Co-operative research', Report of a European Commission Workshop, Governance and Scientific Advice Unit of DG RTD, Directorate C2, Brussels, 2006. http://www.eurosfaire.prd.fr/7pc/doc/1146233108_gover_science_final_report.pdf [accessed 21 September 2007].
  • H. Banthien, M. Jaspers, A. Renner, Governance of the European Research Area: The Role of Civil Society, The Final Report, Bensheim - Berlin - Brussels: European Commission, 2003.
  • K. Gorlach, T. Adamski, K. Dzwonkowska, A. Pilichowski, P. Starosta, Knowledge Dynamics and the non- agricultural economy in European rural development, Eastern European Countryside 14 (2008).
  • M. Bergmann, , B. Brohmann, E. Hofmann, C. M. Loibl, R. Rehaag, E.Schramm and J.-P. Vo8. Qualitatskriterien transdisziplinarer Forschung. Ein Leitfaden fur die formative Evaluation von Forschungsprojekten. ISOE-Studientexte 13 (2005).
  • CH. Pohl, G. Hirsch-Hadorn, Gestaltungsprinzipien fur die transdisziplinare Forschung: Ein Beitrag des td- net. Oekom-Verlag, 2006.
  • B. Gustavsen, Theory and practice: the mediating discourse, w: P. Reason, and H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of Action Research, SAGE. London, 2001.
  • S. Karner, N. Chioncel, W. Goszczyński, L. Juroszek, Experiences of Co-operative Research on AAFNs. FAAN working papers 2010
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171522575

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.