PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2018 | 17 | nr 2 | 211--221
Tytuł artykułu

Innovation as an Immanent Attribute of an Agile Enterprise

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Motivation: Each organization faces the challenge of operating in an environment that is unpredictable and turbulent. Emergence of business era caused that change had become a key feature that determines the economic environment of an enterprise. Market environment forces companies to seek strategic orientation that would allow them to use market opportunities and come to grips with growing customer demands. These goals can only be achieved by an organization that bears the hallmarks of agility. Therefore, one can assume that the condition of gaining competitive advantage and innovation of modern companies is possessing by them the attributes of agility. The agile organization is innovative, which means that it puts an emphasis on research and development, implements innovation, invests in new technologies and innovative programs. Aim: The purpose of this article is to analyse relationships between obtaining an ability to be innovative and agility attributes of an organization. Result: The presented research confirms that there is a connection between having agility attributes by a company and obtaining by it a high level of innovation. Many authors also specify important role of IT system in introducing product innovations and innovation processes.(original abstract)
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
17
Numer
Strony
211--221
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Lublin University of Technology, Lublin, Poland
  • Bronisław Markiewicz State Higher School of Technology and Economics in Jarosław, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Dahmardeh, N., & Banihashemi, S.A. (2010). Organizational agility and agile manufacturing. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 27.
  • D'Aveni, R.A. (1994). Hypercompetition: managing the dynamics of strategic manoeuvring. New York: Free Press.
  • Goldman, S.L., Preiss, K., Nagel, R.N., & Dove, R. (1991). 21st century manufacturing enterprise strategy: an Industry-Led View. Bethlehem: Iacocca Institute at Lehigh University.
  • Goldman, S.L, Nagel, R.N, & Preiss, K. (1995). Agile competitors and virtual organizations: strategies for enriching the customer. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  • Jackson, M., & Johansson, C. (2003). An agility analysis from a production system perspective. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 14(6). doi:10.1108/09576060310491342.
  • Kidd, P.T. (1995). Agile manufacturing: a strategy for the 21st Century. doi:10.1049/ic:19960497.
  • Kumar, A., & Motowani, J.A. (1995). A methodology for assessing time-based competitive advantage of manufacturing firms. International Journal of Operations and Production management, 15(2). doi:10.1108/01443579510080409.
  • Lasrado F., Arif, M., & Rizvi, A. (2015). The determinants for sustainability of an employee suggestion system. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 32(2). doi:10.1108/IJQRM-02-2013-0035.
  • McGaughey, R.E. (1999). Internet technology: contributing to agility in the twenty-first century. International Journal of Agile Management Systems, 1(1). doi:10.1108/14654659910266655.
  • Narasimhan, R., Talluri, S., & Mahapatra, S.K. (2006). Multiproduct, multicriteria model for supplier selection with product life-cycle considerations. Decision Sciences, 37(4). doi:10.1111/j.1540-5414.2006.00139.x.
  • Olesiński, Z., Rzepka, A., & Sabat, A. (2016). Międzyorganizacyjne sieci współpracy gospodarczej na przykładzie Polski, Kanady i Gruzji. Warszawa: Texter.
  • Pawłowski, K. (2015). Operationalization of supply chain agility in an enterprise operating in high market orientation. Gospodarka Materiałowa i Logi-styka, 12(3).
  • Pichlak, M. (2012). Uwarunkowania innowacyjności organizacji. Studium teoretyczne i wyniki badań. Warszawa: Difin.
  • Rigby, K. (2000). Bullying in schools: guidelines to effective action. Professional Reading Guide for Educational Administrators, 21(1).
  • Rzepka, A. (2017). Inter-organizational relations as a one of sources of competitive advantage of contemporary enterprises in the era of globalization. Procedia Engineering, 174. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.195.
  • Sherehiy, B., Karwowski, W., & Layer, J.K. (2007). A review of enterprise agility: concepts, framework and attributes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37(5). doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2007.01.007.
  • Sajdak, M. (2013). Innowacyjność jako niezbędna cecha zwinnego przedsiębiorstwa. Wrocław: UE we Wrocławiu.
  • Sharifi, H., & Zhang, Z. (1999). A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations: an introduction. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1-2). doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00217-5.
  • Storey, J., Emberson, C., & Reade, D. (2005). The barriers to customer responsive supply chain management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(3). doi:10.1108/01443570510581853.
  • Trzcieliński, S. (2011). Przedsiębiorstwo zwinne. Poznań: Politechnika Poznańska.
  • Zain, M., CheRose, R., Abdullah, I., & Masromd, M. (2005). The relationship between information technology acceptance and organizational agility in Malaysia. Information and Management, 42(6). doi:10.1016/j.im.2004.09.001.
  • Zhang, Z., & Sharifi, H. (2000). A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organizations. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(4). doi:10.1108/01443570010314818.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171525379

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.