PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2018 | 17 | nr 2 | 233--245
Tytuł artykułu

Knowledge Management Models as a Source of Employee and Organization's Efficiency

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Motivation: Knowledge management in an organization is a new and less explored area in business literature and business practice. The scope of changes to enterprises influenced by competitive environment forces them to continuous seeking new ways of achieving the success. So-called intangible development factors start to be extremely meaningful - especially knowledge, consciously gained, created and disseminated through diversified methods aimed at shaping employees' appropriate behaviours and developing information technology, which succours this process. Applying this approach requires the proper preparation of the organizational background and the system operation allowing the selection of a specific model. There are a lot of knowledge management models for organisation's decision-makers to be able to manage the resources properly and skilfully. Aim: The aim of the article is to present the significance of knowledge management models' use in modern organizations. The authors constructed 2 main research questions for which they sought answers within the collection of empirical material: What are the main knowledge management models used in a company? And How can models influence the effectiveness of an organization? The following research hypothesis has been constructed: In practice management has not yet developed appropriate models for evaluating and diagnosing the impact of models on the effectiveness of business decisions. The empirical material was collected by means of a qualitative method and the technique used was a secondary analysis of the existing data in the form of thematic sources. Results: The results of the review of the literature of the subject are presented as a synthetic description. Literary research was conducted at the turn of 2016 and 2017. Added value is a review of existing models that can be used in management practice.(original abstract)
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
17
Numer
Strony
233--245
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • University of Social Sciences, Łódź, Poland
  • University of Lodz, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Frost, A. (2012). The SECI Model and Knowledge Conversion. Retrieved 16.03.2018 from http://www.knowledge-management-tools.net.
  • Hajro, A., Gibson, C B., & Pudelko, M. (2017). Knowledge processes in multi-cultural teams: linking organizational diversity climates to teams' effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1). doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0442.
  • Hammer, M. (2007). The process audit. Harvard Business Review, April.
  • Hormiga, E., de Saa-Perez, P., Diaz-Diaz, N.L., Ballesteros-Rodriguez, J.L., & Aguiar-Diaz, I. (2017). The influence of entrepreneurial orientation on the performance of Academic research groups: the mediating role of knowledge sharing. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(1). doi:10.1007/s10961-015-9463-2.
  • Jarugowa, A., & Fijałkowska, J. (2002). Rachunkowość i zarządzanie kapitałem intelektualnym. Koncepcje i praktyka. Gdańsk: ODiDK.
  • Jasińska, J. (2015). Zmiany w organizacjach. Sprawne zarządzanie, sytuacje kryzysowe i warunki osiągania sukcesu. Warszawa: Frel.
  • Kaplan, R.D., & Norton, D.P. (2001). Strategiczna karta wyników. Jak przełożyć strategię na działanie. Warszawa: PWN.
  • Kożusznik, B. (2005). Kierowanie zespołem pracowniczym. Warszawa: PWE.
  • Laloux, F. (2015). The future of management is teal. Retrieved 04.06.2016 from https://www.strategy-business.com.
  • Obłój, K. (2007). O zarządzaniu refleksyjnie. Warszawa: MT Biznes.
  • Presley Noble, B. (1996). 'Wellsprings of knowledge' by Dorothy Leonard-Barton. Strategy+Business, 2.
  • Probst, G., Raub, S., & Romhardt, K. (2002). Zarządzanie wiedzą w organizacji. Kraków: Oficyna Ekonomiczna.
  • Quigley, N.R. (2013). A longitudinal, multilevel study of leadership efficacy development in MBA teams. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(4). doi:10.5465/amle.2011.0524.
  • Rai, R.K. (2011). Knowledge management and organizational culture: a theoretical integrative framework. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(5). doi:10.1108/13673271111174320.
  • Rummler, G.A., & Brache, A.P. (2000). Podnoszenie efektywności w organizacji. Warszawa: PWE.
  • Suhwan, J., Young Gul, K., & Joon K. (2011). An integrative model for knowledge sharing in communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(2). doi:10.1108/13673271111119682.
  • Wang, S., & Noe R. (2010). Knowledge sharing: a review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2). doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001.
  • Wennberg, K., Pathak, S., & Autio, E. (2013). How culture moulds the effects of self-efficacy and fear of failure on entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(9-10). doi:10.1080/08985626.2013.862975.
  • Wong, C.A., & Laschinger H.K. (2013). Authentic leadership, performance, and job satisfaction: the mediating role of empowerment. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(4). doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06089.x.
  • Ziębicki, A. (2007). Efektywność a jakość w sektorze publicznym. In A. Potocki (Ed.), Społeczne aspekty przeobrażeń organizacyjnych. Warszawa: Difin.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171525385

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.