PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2017 | 16 | nr 4 | 285--304
Tytuł artykułu

Empirical Assessment of the Link Between Participatory Decision-Making and Firm Performance in Nigeria

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Empiryczna ocena zależności między partycypacyjnym podejmowaniem decyzji a działalnością przedsiębiorstw w Nigerii
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Background. Participatory decision-making maintains a leading theme across business, policy, and practice research. The success of any organisation depends on involving the workforce's entire capacity to produce new ideas and ways of working to outsmart the competitors and have a competitive edge in the industry they are operating in.
Research aims. The focus of this study was to examine participatory decision-making and firm performance in the Nigerian banking industry. The study precisely sought: to determine the effect of employee participation in work decision on service quality of the firm, to ascertain the relationship between consultative participation and firm profitability, and to investigate how representative participation can affect the timely delivery of firm service as well as to determine the impact of short-term participation on the productivity of the firm.
Methodology. In the course of this study, several relevant literary works were reviewed. The survey method was used to collect data of which 300 copies of the questionnaire were distributed and 288 were retrieved. Regression analysis and Pearson correlation coefficient were used to test hypotheses.
Key findings. The results show that a significant and positive relationship exists between service quality and employees' participation in work decision. Similarly, a weak significant positive relationship exists between consultative participation and firm profitability. Furthermore, there exists a positive relationship between timely delivery of firm service and representative participation. On the other hand, there is no positive relationship between productivity of the firm and short-term participation. When employees are allowed to participate in decision-making, it gives them a sense of responsibility for their actions as they see themselves as an important member of the organisation. The study, however, recommends that for the promotion of creativity as well as innovation in the organisation, employees should be allowed to participate in decision-making. (original abstract)
Tło badań. Uczestniczenie w podejmowaniu decyzji to główny temat badań biznesowych, politycznych i praktycznych. Sukces każdej organizacji zależy od zaangażowania całej siły roboczej w opracowywanie nowych pomysłów i sposobów pracy, aby wyprzedzić konkurencję i zyskać konkurencyjną przewagę w branży.
Cele badań. Głównym celem było zbadanie udziału w podejmowaniu decyzji i wynikach firmy w nigeryjskim sektorze bankowym. Badanie miało na celu: określenie wpływu udziału pracowników w podejmowaniu decyzji dotyczących jakości usług firmy, ustalenie związku między udziałem konsultacyjnym a rentownością firmy oraz zbadanie, w jaki sposób udział reprezentatywny może wpłynąć na terminowe świadczenie usług przez firmę, a także na ile określa wpływ krótkookresowego uczestnictwa na produktywność firmy.
Metodologia. W trakcie badania poddano przeglądowi istotne publikacje poświęcone powyższej tematyce. Wykorzystano ankietę do zebrania danych, z 300 rozprowadzonych uzyskano 288 zwrotnych. Z kolei do testowania hipotez wykorzystano analizę regresji i współczynnik korelacji Pearsona.
Kluczowe wnioski. Wyniki pokazują, że istnieje istotna i pozytywna zależność między jakością usług a udziałem pracowników w podejmowaniu decyzji. Istnieje natomiast słaba istotna pozytywna zależność między udziałem konsultacyjnym a rentownością firmy. Ponadto istnieje pozytywny związek między terminową dostawą usług firmy i reprezentatywnym udziałem. Z drugiej strony nie ma pozytywnego związku pomiędzy produktywnością firmy i krótkoterminowym uczestnictwem. Kiedy pracownicy mają prawo do udziału w podejmowaniu decyzji, daje im to poczucie odpowiedzialności za swoje działania, ponieważ postrzegają siebie jako ważnych członków organizacji. W badaniu zaleca się, aby w celu promowania kreatywności oraz innowacji w organizacji pracownicy mogli brać udział w podejmowaniu decyzji. (abstrakt oryginalny)
Rocznik
Tom
16
Numer
Strony
285--304
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Covenant University Ota Ogun State Nigeria
  • Mendel University in Brno, Czech Republic
  • Covenant University Ota Ogun State Nigeria
  • Covenant University Ota Ogun State Nigeria
  • Covenant University Ota Ogun State Nigeria
Bibliografia
  • Abdulai, A.I., & Shafiwu, B.A. (2014). Participatory Decision-making and Employee Productivity: A Case Study of Community Banks in the Upper East region of Ghana. Business and Economic Journal, 5, 3.
  • Ainuddin, R.A., Beamish, P.W., Hulland, J.S., & Rouse, M.J. (2007). Resource Attributes and Firm Performance in International Joint Ventures. Journal of World Business, 42, 47-60.
  • Alsughayir, A. (2016). Employee Participation in Decision-making (PDM) and Firm Performance. International Business Research, 9(7), 64-70.
  • Barney, J.B. (1995). Looking Inside for Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 9(4), 49-61.
  • Babakus, E., Yavas, U., Karatepe, O.M., & Avci, T. (2003). The Effect of Management Commitment to Service Quality on Employees' Affective and Performance Outcomes. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(3), 272-286.
  • Beardwell, J., & Claydon, T. (2007). Human Resource Management: A Contemporary Approach. Harlow: Pearson Education.
  • Bhuiyan, M.H. (2010). Employee Participation in Decision Making in RMG sector of Bangladesh: Correlation with Motivation and Performance. Journal of Business and Technology, 5(2), 122-132.
  • Bradley, K., & Stephen, H. (1987). Quality Circles and Managerial Interests. Industrial Relations. Journal of EconSoc, 26, 68-82.
  • Busck, O., Knudsen, H., & Lind, J. (2010). The Transformation of Employee Participation: Consequences for the Work Environment. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 31(3), 285-305.
  • Conte, M.A., & Svejnar, J. (1988). Productivity Effects of Worker Participation in Management, Profit-sharing, Worker Ownership of Assets and Unionisation in U.S Firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 6, 139-151.
  • Corsentino, D., & Bue, P. (1993). Employee Involvement: FBIL mv Enforcement Bulletin. e-Journal 62, 10-11, EBSCO host database. Accessed 27th February 2015.
  • David, F. (2005). Strategic management: Concepts and Cases. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Defourney, J., Estrin, S., & Jones, D. (1985). The Effects of Worker's Participation on Enterprise Performance: Empirical Evidence from French Cooperatives. International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 3, 197-217.
  • Faiello, P. (2000). Employee power. CA Magazine, 133, 45-46.
  • Gollan, P.J., & Wilkinson, A. (2007). Contemporary Developments in Information and Consultation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(7), 1133-1144.
  • Gomez-Mejia, R.L., Balkin, B.D., & Cardy, L.R. (2005). Management: People, Performance, Change. Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  • Helms, M. (2006). Theory X and Theory Y. Encyclopaedia of Management Education. Available at http://www.enotes.com/managementencyclopedia/theory-x-theory-y[. Accessed 12th February 2015.
  • Hughes, L.W., Avey, J.B., & Norman, S.M. (2008). A study of supportive climate, trust, engagement and organisational commitment. Journal of Business and Leadership: Research, Practice and Teaching, 4(2), 51-59.
  • Isabirye, A. (2007). Employee Participation in Post-apartheid South Africa as a Tool for Global Competitiveness, Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Johannesburg.
  • Khattak, M.A., Igbal, N., & Bashir, F. (2012). Employee Involvement and Participation at Work: A Case Study of OTCL After Privatisation. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(6), 469-476.
  • Kim, J., MacDuffie, J.P., & Pil, F.K. (2010). Employee Voice and Organisational Performance: Team versus Representative Influence. Human Relations, 63(3), 371-394.
  • Konrad, A. (2006). Engaging Employees Through High-involvement Work Practices. Ivey Business Journal, March/April, 1-6.
  • KPMG (2014). Customer service report on banks in Nigeria.
  • Lawler, E.E., Mohrman, S.A., & Ledford, G.E. (1992). Employee Involvement and Total Quality Management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Likert, R. (1969). Supervision. In: D. Allison (ed.), The R&D Game (pp. 161-181). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Lytle, R.S., & Timmerman, J.E. (2006). Service Orientation and Performance: An Organisational Perspective. Journal of Services Marketing, 20(2), 136-147.
  • Locke, E.A. & David, M.S. (1979). Participation in Decision-Making: One More Look. Res Org Beh, 123, 647-664.
  • Luthans, F. (2005). Organisational Behaviour. New York-Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Houghton Mifflin Company.
  • Noah, Y. (2008). A Study of Worker Participation in Management Decision Making Within Selected Establishments in Lagos, Nigeria. Journal of Social Science, 17(1), 31-39.
  • Ojokuku, R.N., & Sajuyigbe, A.S. (2014). Effect of Employee Participation in Decision-making On Performance of Selected Small and Medium Scale Enterprises in Lagos, Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(10), 93-97.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1994). Competitive advantage through people: Unleashing the power of the workforce. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Sampler, J. (1998). Redefining Industry Structure for the Information Age. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 343-355.
  • Sashkin, M. (1984). Participative Management is an Ethical Imperative. Org Dyn, 12, 4-22.
  • Somech, A. (2002). Explicating the Complexity of Participative Management: An Investigation of Multiple Dimensions. EduAdm Quart, 11, 341-371.
  • Spender, J.C. (1996). Making Knowledge the Basis of a Dynamic Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 45-62.
  • Steel, R.P., & Lloyd, R.R. (1988). Cognitive, Affective and Behavioural Outcomes of Participation in Quality Circle: Conceptual and Empirical Findings. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 24, 624-647.
  • Steinheider, B., Bayerl, P.S., & Wuestewald, T. (2006). Community-based Adaptation to Climate Change: An Overview', in Community-based Adaptation to Climate Change', Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) Series, no. 60. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), 11-33.
  • Stoner, J.A.F., Freeman, R.E., & Gilbert, Jr. D.R. (2003). Management. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India.
  • Stringer, L. (2006). The Link between the Quality of the Supervisor-Employee Relationship and the Level of the Employee's Job Satisfaction. Pub Org Rev, 6, 125-142.
  • Tchapchet, E.M., Iwu, C.G., & Allen-lle, C. (2014). Employee Participation and Productivity in a South African University. Implications for Human Resource Management. Problems and Perspective in Management, 12(4), 293-303.
  • Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
  • Thompson, M.A. (2002). An Exploratory Investigation of Learning Culture Theory and Employee Participation in Decision Making. Human Research Development Quart, 13, 271-288.
  • Thornton, R.C. (2009). The Impact of Employee Participation on the Job Satisfaction of Blue-collar Workers. A Bachelor of Science Thesis of the Colorado College.
  • Tybout, J.R. (2000). Manufacturing Firms in Developing Countries; How Well They Do, and Why? Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 11-44.
  • Vanderberg, R.J., Richardson, H.A., & Eastman, L.J. (1999). The Impact of High Involvement Work Processes on Organizational Effectiveness: A Second-Order Latent Variable Approach. Group and Org Manage, 24, 300-339.
  • Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics, an Introductory Analysis. New York: Harper and Row.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171525401

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.