PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2017 | z. 4 (46) | 779--786
Tytuł artykułu

The 'Ecosystem Services' Concept in Environmental Law

Autorzy
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The purpose of this study is to introduce the 'ecosystem services' concept from the legal perspective, which so far has not attracted as much attention in the Polish scientific community as analyses focused on natural and economic aspects. The concept is strongly promoted as a part of biodiversity and water protection measures which are issues of key importance for the agriculture. This means the agriculture sector will be the first to be affected by legal loopholes in this area. The analysis includes a general attempt to identify the legal grounds for the term and concept of 'ecosystem services' as well as the assessment of the current state of the Polish legislator's works on this matter. At the same time, a confrontation of this concept's theoretical grounds with the underpinning values of environmental law (especially with the 'polluter pays' principle) allows to detail the part of this concept (positive externalities of ecosystem services and PES) which currently poses a real challenge for the Polish legislator and requires a redefinition of current directions for specifying the environmental rights and obligations. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
779--786
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu
Bibliografia
  • Baum, R. (2008). Zrównoważony rozwój rolnictwa i kryteria jego oceny. J. Agribus. Rural Dev., 7(1), 1-11.
  • Blanco, E., Razzaque, J. (2009). Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being in a Globalized World: Assessing the Role of Law. Human Rights Quart., 3, 692-720.
  • Brand, U., Vadrot, A. B. M. (2013). Epistemic Selectivities and the Valorisation of Nature: the Cases of the Nagoya Protocol And the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform For Biodiversity And Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Law Env. Dev. J., 2, 202-220.
  • CICES (2017). Retrieved June 20th 2017 from: https://cices.eu
  • FAO (2010). Relevance of OECD agri-environmental measures for remuneration of positive externalities/payments for environmental services. Retrieved June 20th 2017 from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/al921e/al921e00.pdf
  • Froger, G., Boisvert, V., Méral, P., Le Coq, J.-F., Caron, A., Aznar, O. (2015). Market-Based Instruments for Ecosystem Services between Discourse and Reality: An Economic and Narrative Analysis. Sustainability, 7, 11595-11611.
  • Global Environment Facility (2014). GEF Investments on Payment for Ecosystem Services Schemes, World Bank: Washington, DC. Retrieved June 20th 2017 from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/20681
  • IPBES (2012). Retrieved June 20th 2017 from: from: http://www.ipbes.net/about-us
  • Król, M. A. (2014). Ochrona biosfery w działalności rolniczej. In: M. Górski (Ed.), Prawo ochrony środowiska (p. 629-642). Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Business.
  • Lugo, E. (2008). Ecosystem Services, the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, and the Conceptual Difference Between Benefits Provided by Ecosystems and Benefits Provided by People. J. Land Use Env. L., 2, 243-261.
  • MAES (2017). Retrieved June 20th 2017 from: http://biodiversity. europa.eu/maes
  • Maes, J. (2016). Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES): Highlights and Uncertainties of a Science-Policy Interface on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Ekon. Środ., 4, 52-64.
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005a). Retrieved June 20th 2017 from: http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/History.html
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005b). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Opportunities and Challenges for Business and Industry. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  • Minister Środowiska (2014). Piąty krajowy raport z wdrażania konwencji o różnorodności biologicznej. Retrieved June 20th 2017 from: http://biodiv.gdos.gov.pl/wdrazanie-konwencji/national-reports/piaty-krajowy-raport/v-krajowyraport-cbd.pdf
  • Monteduro, M. (2013). Environmental Law and Agroecology. Transdisciplinary Approach to Public Ecosystem Services as a New Challenge for Environmental Legal Doctrine. Europ. Energy Environ. Law Rev., 1, 2-11.
  • OECD (1992). The Polluter-Pays Principle. OECD Analyses and Recommendations - OCDE/GD(92)81, Paris: OECD.
  • Olszynski, M.Z.P. (2012). Environmental Damages after the Federal Environmental Enforcement Act: Bringing Ecosystem Services to Canadian Environmental Law?, Osgoode Hall Law J., 1, 129-176.
  • Radecki, W. (2008). Ustawa o ochronie przyrody. Komentarz. Warszawa: Difin.
  • Ring, I., Hansjürgens, B., Elmqvist, T., Wittmer, H., Sukhdev, P. (2010). Challenges in framing the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: the TEEB initiative. Current Opinion in Environ. Sustainability, 2, 15-26.
  • Ruhl, J. B., Lant, C. L., Kraft, S. E. (2007). The Law and Policy of Ecosystem Services. Washington: Island Press.
  • Ruhl, J. B. (2008). Agriculture And Ecosystem Services: Strategies For State And Local Governments. N.Y. U. Env. Law J., 17, 424-459.
  • Salzman, J. (2006). A Field of Green? The Past and Future of Ecosystem Services. J. Land Use Env. Law, 2, 133-151.
  • Salzman, J., Thompson, B. H., Daily, G. C. (2001). Protecting Ecosystem Services: Science, Economics, and Law. Stanford Env. Law J., 2, 309-332.
  • Stenseke, M. (2016). The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services and the challenge of integrating social sciences and humanities. Bull. Geogr. Soc. Econ. Ser., 33, 119-129.
  • Stępniewska, M., Zwierzchowska, I., Mizgajski, A. (2017). Capability of the Polish legal system to introduce the ecosystem services approach into environmental management. Ecosys. Serv. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.025
  • TEEB (2014). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) FOr agriculture & food. Concept note. Retrieved June 20th 2017 from: http://www.teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/TEEB-for-Agriculture-and- Food_Concept-note1.pdf
  • TEEB (2017). The initiative. Retrieved June 20th 2017 from: http://www.teebweb.org/about/the-initiative
  • UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2013). Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES): best practice guide. Retrieved June 20th 2017 from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/payments-forecosystem-services-pes-best-practice-guide
  • UNECE (2014). The Value Of Forests. Payments for Ecosystem Services in a Green Economy. Geneva Timber And Forest Study Paper 34 (ECE/TIM/SP/34). Geneva: United Nations.
  • Vincent, J. R. (2012). Ecosystem Services and Green Growth. Policy Research Working Paper 6233, Washington: The World Bank Development Research Group Environment and Energy Team & Sustainable Development Network Office of the Chief Economist.
  • Żmija, D. (2011). System płatności bezpośrednich w Polsce w kontekście rozwiązań stosowanych w Unii Europejskiej. Zesz. Nauk. SGGW Warsz. Probl. Roln. Świat., 1, 193-201.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171525653

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.