Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2017 | Vol. 5, Iss. 1 | 43--58
Tytuł artykułu

Convergence of Social Marketing and Public Administration: Democratizing Value Creation

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
This article aims to explain the interface between advances in civilization and advances in communication. Th e article also addresses the inadequacy of public administration literature to explain why communication media is important to its theory and practice. Subsequently, the article explicates why communication media contribute to the public administrator's ability to improve the quality of democracy. The literature on communication media and public administration provide conceptual data that indicates how communication media continuously contributed to the public administrator's ability to manage large disparate social-economic units. Network theory and administrative commu- nication theory indicate why communication networks improve institutional effectiveness and efficiency. The literature confirms the need for clarity on how the interface between communication media and public administration increases public value and improves the quality of democracy. Network theory is a viable strategy for increasing the public administrators' ability to increase public value. (original abstract)
Opis fizyczny
  • Alan, K. (2011). The Social Lens: An Invitation to Social and Sociological Theory. Los Angeles: Sage Publication.
  • Aristotle (2004). Nicomachean Ethics. (Crisp, Roger. Trans. & Edit.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Aristotle. (1998) Politics. (Reeves, C. Trans.). Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.
  • Bozeman, B. (2007). Public Values and Public Interests. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
  • Caldwell, L. (2005). Public Administration - The New Generation: Management in Higher Information-level Societies. Public Administration: An Interdisciplinary Critical Analysis. (Gadot, Eran. Edit.). New York: Taylor and Francis.
  • Casmir, F. (1994). Building communication theories: A socio/cultural approach. Hillside, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Castells, M. (2009). Communication Power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Castells, M. (2007). Communication, Power and Counter-power in the Network Society. International Journal of Communication. Volume 1, 238-266.
  • Chaffee, S. H. (1975). Political communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Corner, J. (2016) Ideology and Media Research. Media, Culture & Society. Volume 38, Issue 2, 265-273.
  • Dahl, R. (1974). Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
  • Denhardt, R., Baker, D. (2007). Five Great Issues in Organization Theory. Handbook of Public Administration. Boca Raton, Florida: Taylor and Francis Group.
  • Durant, R. (2004). Reconceptualizing Purpose. Environmental Governance Reconsidered: Challenges, Choices, and Opportunities. (Durant, R. O'Leary, R., Fiorino, D. Edits.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
  • Eikeland, O. (2008). Th e Ways of Aristotle: Aristotelian Phrónêsis, Aristotelian Philosophy of Dialogue, and Action Research. Bern, Germany: Peter Lang, AG.
  • Dewey, J. (1929). Experience in Nature. London: George Allen & Unwin, LTD.
  • Fagan, B., Scarre, C. (2008) Ancient Civilizations. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
  • Follett, M.-P. (1940). Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishing.
  • Frederickson, G., Smith, Kevin., Larimer, C., Licari, M. (2012). The Public Administration Theory Primer. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
  • Fuchs, C., (2011). The Contemporary World Wide Web: Social medium or new space of accumulation? The Political Economies of Media: The Transformation of the Global Media Industries. (Winseck, Dwayne. & Dal, Jin.Edits.). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Garnett, J. (1992). Communicating for Results in Government: A Strategic Approach for Public Managers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Company.
  • Garnett, J. (1997). Trends and Gaps in the Treatment of Communication in Organization and Management Theory. Handbook of Administrative Communication, New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
  • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Hardt, H. (2001). Social Theories of the Press: Constituents of Communication Research, 1840s to 1920s. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
  • Holden, M., Jr. (1996). Continuity and disruption: Essays in public administration. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Huddleston, M. (2000). Onto the Darkling Plain: Globalization and the American Public Service in the Twenty-First Century, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Volume 10, Issue 4, 665-684.
  • Innis, H. (2007). Empire and Communications. Ontario, Canada: Dundurn Press Limited.
  • Innis, H. (2006). The Bias of Communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Kattl, D. (2002). The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for Twenty First Century America. Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Klijn, E., Koppenjan, J. (2012). Governance network theory: past, present and future. Policy and Politics. Volume 40, Number 4, 187-206.
  • Lee, M. (2011). Government Public Relations: What is it Good For? The Practice of Government Public Relations. (Lee, M., Neeley, G. Stewart, K. Edit.). Boca Rotan, Florida: Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Lee, Mordecai. (2009). The Return of Public Relations to the Public Administration Curriculum? Journal of Public Aff airs Education. Volume 15, Number 4, 515-533.
  • Liu B.F. & Horsley J.S. (2007). Th e Government Communication Decision Wheel: Toward a Public Relations Model for the Public Sector. Journal of Public Relations Research. Volume 19, Issue 4, 377-378.
  • Lorch, R. (1978). Public Administration. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Social Systems. (Bednarz, J. & Baecker, D. T.). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
  • Luhmann, N (2002). Theories of distinction: Redescribing the Condition of Modernity. (Rasch, W. Edit.) Stanford California: Stanford University Press.
  • Mann, M. (2005). The Sources of Power: A history of power from the beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Marsh, D., Smith, M. (2000). Understanding Policy Networks: towards a Dialectical Approach. Political Studies. Volume 48, Issue 1, 4-21.
  • McLaughlin, P. (2001). Toward an Ecology of Social Action: Merging the Ecological and Constructivist Traditions. Human Ecology Review. Vol. 8, No. 2, 12-28.
  • Miller, L. (2016). Intercultural Communications and Global Social Existence: A cross cultural analysis of communication theory. Review of Social Sciences. Volume 1, Number 1, 26-37.
  • Miller, L. (2015). A Marketing Strategy for Democratizing Value Creation. Research Journal of Economics, Business and ICT. Vol. 10, Issue 1, Article Number 4, 17-24.
  • Miller, L. (2014). Power, Knowledge Generation, Middle Eastern Transcendentalism and Global Rational Discourse. The Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies. Volume XXXVIII, Number 1, 1-21.
  • Miller, L. (2014). The Role of Religion in Shaping Global Social Existence. International Journal of Religion and Society. Volume 4, Number 4, 439-455.
  • Molina, A., Spicer, M. (2004). Aristotelian Rhetoric, Pluralism, and Public Administration. Administration and Society. Volume 36, Number 3, 282-305.
  • Moore, M. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • Nerone, J. (2006). The Future of Communication History. Critical Studies in Media Communication. Volume 23, Number 3, 254-62.
  • O'Toole, L. (1997a). The Implications for Democracy in a Networked Bureaucratic World. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Volume 7, Issue 3, 443-459.
  • O'Toole, L. (1997b). Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research Based Agendas in Public Administration. Public Administration Review. Volume 57, Number 1, 45-52.
  • Oppenheim,L. (1977). Ancient Mesopotamia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Osborne, R. (2006). Civilization: A New History of the Western World. New York: Pegasus Books, LLC.
  • Parsons, T. (1991).The Social System. London: Routledge.
  • Powell, F. (2007). The Politics of Civil Society. Bristol, UK: Polity Press.
  • Raadschelders, J., Vifos-Gadot, E. (2015) Dimensions of Public Adminstratinon and Governance. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Rice, M. (2007). A post-modern cultural competency framework for public administration and public service delivery. International Journal of Public Sector Management. Volume 20, Number 7, 622-637.
  • Rice, M. (2015). Diversity and Public Administration: Theory, Issues, and Perspectives. (Rice, M. Edit.). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
  • Riggs, F. (1980). The Ecology and Context of Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective. Public Administration Review, Volume 40, Number 2, 107-115.
  • Risjord,M. (2014). Philosophy of Social Science. New York: Routledge Publishing.
  • Rosenbloom, D. (2002). Public Administration and Civil Liberties. Public Administration Review. Volume 62, 58-60.
  • Rossides, D. (1998). Social Theory: Its Origins, History, and Contemporary Relevance. Dixon Hills, New York: General Hall, Inc.
  • Roy, J. (2013) Public Administration and Information Technology. New York: Springer Publishing.
  • Simon, H. (1957). Administrative behavior: a study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. New York: McMillan.
  • Sarkar, S. (2010). Public Administration in India. New Delhi: PHI Learning Private Limited.
  • Standage, T. (2013). Writing on the Wall: Social Media - Th e First 2,000 Years. New York: Bloomsbury USA.
  • Stillman, R. (2012). Public Administration: Concept and Cases. Boston, Massachusetts: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
  • Stoker, G. (2006). Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance? American Review of Public Administration. Volume 36, Number 1, 41-57.
  • Turner, K. (2009). Law and Punishment in the Formation of Empire. Rome and China: Comparative Perspectives on Ancient World Empires. (Scheidel, Walter. Edit.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Waldo, D. (1952). Development of Th eory of Democratic Administration. American Political Science Review. Volume 46, issue 1, 81-103.
  • Waldo, D. (1992). Foreword. In J.L. Garnett, Communicating for results in government: A strategic approach for public managers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Waldo, D. (1948). The Administrative State. New York: Th e Ronald Press Company.
  • Waldo, D. (1955). The Study of Public Administration. Garden City, New York: Doubleday and Company, Inc.
  • Walsh, K. (1994). Marketing and Public Sector Management. European Journal of Marketing. Volume 28, Number 3, 63-71.
  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society. (Roth, Guenther. & Wittich, Claus. Edits.). Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
  • Weber, M. (1958). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. (Gerth, H. & Mills, W.. Edits. & Trans.). New York: Galaxy Publications.
  • Wellen, R. (1996). Dilemmas in Liberal Democratic Th ought Since Max Weber. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.