Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2018 | vol. 14, iss. 4 | 882--893
Tytuł artykułu

Can Disclosure Practices And Stakeholder Management Influence Zakat Payers' Trust? : A Malaysian Evidence

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
This study examines whether disclosure practices and stakeholder management play an important role in influencing the zakat payers' trust in the zakat institutions in Malaysia. A regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between disclosure practices and stakeholder management of the zakat institutions on zakat payers' trust. Using questionnaire survey on 184 zakat payers, this study shows that the disclosure practices do influence the zakat payers' trust in the zakat institutions. However, it is revealed that stakeholder management does not influence the zakat payers' trust in zakat institutions. The findings in this study imply that the zakat institutions should focus on the transparency of disclosure practices. The findings in this research could assist the zakat institutions to increase the trust level of the zakat taxpayers towards them and assist the policy makers in establishing zakat institutions which would be perceived by the public as legitimate. (original abstract)
Słowa kluczowe
Opis fizyczny
  • King AbdulAziz University, Saudi Arabia
  • Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia
  • Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia
  • Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia
  • Universitas Pasundan, Indonesia
  • Abioyea, M. M. O., Mohamad, M. H. S., & Adnan, A. (2011). Antecedents of zakat payers' trust: The case of Nigeria. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 19(3), 1-24
  • Ahmad, I. H. J., & Ma'in, M. (2014). The efficiency of zakat collection and distribution: Evidence from two stage analysis. Journal of Economic Cooperation and Development, 35(3), 133-170.
  • Ahmad, N. N. N., & Sulaiman, M. (2004). Environment disclosure in Malaysia annual reports: A legitimacy theory perspective. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 14(1), 44-58.
  • Alam, M. (2006). Stakeholder theory. Spiramus Press Ltd.
  • Bennett, R., & Barkensjo, A. (2005). Causes and consequences of donor perceptions of the quality of the relationship marketing activities of charitable organisations. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 13(2), 122-139.
  • Bennett, R., & Gabriel, H. (2003). Image and reputational characteristics of UK charitable organisations: An empirical study. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(3), 276-289.
  • Berry, L.L, (1995). Relationship marketing of services - growing interest, emerging perspectives. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 236-245.
  • Deegan, C., (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures - a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282-311.
  • Deloitte & Touche (2004). Internal control over financial reporting an investor resources. In P. K. Day (Ed.), Accountabilities: Five Public Services. New York: Tavistock Publications.
  • Dhalla, R. (2007). The construction of organisational identity: Key contributing external and intra-organisational factors. Corporate Reputation Review. 10(4), 245-260.
  • Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. The Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35-51.
  • Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Account and accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. Prentice Hall. ISBN 9780131758605.
  • Gunardi, A. (2014). The implementation of UEFA Financial Fair Play: An Analysis of Financial Performance of Manchester United. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(10), 612-620.
  • Honggowati, S., Rahmawati, R., Aryani, Y. A., & Probohudono, A. N. (2017). Corporate governance and strategic management accounting disclosure. Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management, 1(1), 23-30.
  • Htay, S. N. N., & Salman, S. A. (2014). Proposed best practices of financial information disclosure for zakat institutions: A case study of Malaysia. World Applied Sciences Journal, 30, 288-294.
  • Jawahar, I., & McLaughlin, G. L. (2001). Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organisational life cycle approach. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 397-414.
  • Karim, A., & Ahmed, R. (1990). Standard setting for the financial reporting of religious business organisations: The case of Islamic banks. Accounting and Business Research, 20(80), 299-305
  • Mediawati, E. (2016). Internal control and sharia supervisory board role in zakat management organisation. International Journal of Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Research, 3(8), 1730-1732.
  • Meyerson, D, Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 166-195). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. The Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38.
  • Muhammad, S. A., & Saad, R. A. J. (2016). Determinants of trust on zakat institutions and its dimensions on Intention to pay Zakat: A pilot study. Journal of Advanced Research in Business and Management Studies, 3(1), 40-46.
  • Mustafa, M. O. A., Mohamad, M. H. S., & Adnan, M. A. (2013). Antecedents of zakat payers' trust in an emerging zakat sector: an exploratory study. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 4(1), 4-25.
  • Patten, D. M. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 17(5), 471-475.
  • Rokhmawati, A., & Gunardi, A. (2017). Is going green good for profit? Empirical evidence from listed manufacturing firms in Indonesia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(4), 181-192.
  • Ruef, M., & Scott, W. R. (1998). A multidimensional model of organisational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 877-904.
  • Saad, R. A. J., & Haniffa, R. (2014). Determinants of zakah (Islamic tax) compliance behavior. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 5(2), 182-193.
  • Salleh, M. S. (2014). Organisational and definitional reconfiguration of zakat management. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(5), 61-70.
  • Sargeant, A., & Lee, S. (2002). Improving public trust in the voluntary sector: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 7(1), 68-83.
  • Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2013). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (6th ed.): Business & Management.
  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610
  • Taha, R., Ali, N. N. M., Zulkifli, M. F., & Paizin, M. N. (2015). Disclosure of zakat information: is it important? Paper presented at the Proceeding of the International Conference on Masjid, Zakat and Waqf (IMAF 2015), Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Wahid, H., Ahmad, S., & Kader, R. A. (2009). Pengagihan zakat oleh institusi zakat di Malaysia: mengapa masyarakat Islam tidak berpuas hati? [Distribution of zakat by zakat institutions in Malaysia: why is the Muslim community dissatisfied?], Shariah Journal, 17(1), 89-112 [in Malaysian].
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.