Internacjonalizacja i usieciowienie jako czynniki wspierające innowacyjność produktową i procesową przedsiębiorstw

• Autorzy: Maja Szymura-Tyc

Warianty tytułu

Internationalization and Networking as Drivers of Product and Process Innovativeness of Firms

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Studia teoretyczne i badania empiryczne wskazują na powiązania między internacjonalizacją i innowacyjnością przedsiębiorstw. Istnieje również bogaty dorobek teoretyczny i badawczy podkreślający znaczenie powiązań sieciowych w procesie tworzenia innowacji. Brakuje jednak badań empirycznych, będących próbą odpowiedzi na pytanie, który z tych dwóch czynników - internacjonalizacja czy usieciowienie - silniej wspiera innowacyjność przedsiębiorstw. Nie wiadomo także, który z dwóch podstawowych typów innowacyjności - innowacyjność produktowa czy innowacyjność procesowa - jest silniej powiązany z internacjonalizacją i usieciowieniem przedsiębiorstwa. Celem badań prezentowanych w tym artykule jest rozpoznanie charakteru i siły powiązań między internacjonalizacją i usieciowieniem a innowacyjnością produktową i procesową przedsiębiorstw w Polsce. Analiza statystyczna danych empirycznych z 274 przedsiębiorstw wskazuje, że internacjonalizacja oraz usieciowienie wspierają innowacyjność przedsiębiorstw, przy czym internacjonalizacja odgrywa tutaj rolę dominującą, sprzyjając zarówno innowacyjności procesowej, jak i produktowej.(abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

Many empirical studies confirm the relationship between internationalization and innovativeness of firms. There is also a rich research stream on the role of networks in creating innovations and networking as conducive for the innovativeness of firms. It is not clear whether the internationalization or the networking is more important for innovativeness of a firm. It is also not clear which type of innovation - product or process innovation is supported stronger by the internationalization and networking. The aim of the research is to explore the relationships between internationalization, networking and product versus process innovativeness of firms in Poland. The empirical data were collected from 274 firms by direct interviews. The key contribution of the research is that learning by internationalization and learning by networking may lead to the innovativeness of firms, but it is the internationalization which plays here the dominating role. For an emerging market, like the Polish one, the internationalization is more conducive for process innovativeness of firms then for their product innovativeness.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Internacjonalizacja; Innowacyjność; Innowacyjność przedsiębiorstw; Powiązania sieciowe

EN

Internationalization; Innovative character; Enterprise innovation; Network relationships

• Czasopismo: Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica
• Rocznik: 2018
• Numer: vol. 2, t. 334
• Strony: 147--167

Twórcy

autor

Maja Szymura-Tyc

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach

Bibliografia

• Anand B.N., Khanna T. (2000), Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances, "Strategic Management Journal", vol. 21(3), s. 295-315.
• Añón Higón D., Driffield N. (2011), Exporting and innovation performance: Analysis of the annual Small Business Survey in the UK, "International Small Business Journal", vol. 29(1), s. 4-24.
• Basile R. (2001), Export behaviour of Italian manufacturing firms over the nineties: the role of innovation, "Research Policy", vol. 30(8), s. 1185-1201.
• Becker S.O., Egger P.H. (2013), Endogenous product versus process innovation and a firm's propensity to export, "Empirical Economics", vol. 44(1), s. 329-354.
• Calantone R.J., Cavusgil S.T., Zhao Y. (2002), Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance, "Industrial Marketing Management", vol. 31(6), s. 515-524.
• Cassiman B., Golovko E. (2011), Innovation and internationalization through exports, "Journal of International Business Studies", vol. 42(1), s. 56-75.
• Cassiman B., Golovko E., Martinez-Ros E. (2010), Innovation, exports and productivity, "International Journal of Industrial Organization", vol. 28(4), s. 372-376.
• Chesbrough H. (2003), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
• Chetty S.K., Stangl L.M. (2010), Internationalization and innovation in a network relationship context, "European Journal of Marketing", vol. 44(11/12), s. 1725-1743.
• Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A. (1990), Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, "Administrative Science Quarterly", vol. 35(1), s. 128-152.
• Cowan R., Jonard N., Zimmermann J.B. (2007), Bilateral collaboration and the emergence of innovation networks, "Management Science", vol. 53(7), s. 1051-1067.
• Damijan J.P., Kostevc Č., Polanec S. (2010), From innovation to exporting or vice versa?, "The World Economy", vol. 33(3), s. 374-398.
• Dhanaraj C., Beamish P.W. (2003), A resource-based approach to the study of export performance, "Journal of Small Business Management", vol. 41(3), s. 242-261.
• Dhanaraj C., Parkhe A. (2006), Orchestrating innovation networks, "Academy of Management Review", vol. 31(3), s. 659-669.
• Fletcher R. (2001), A holistic approach to internationalization, "International Business Review", vol. 10(1), s. 25-49.
• Foray D., Lundvall B. (1998), The knowledge-based economy: from the economics of knowledge to the learning economy, [w:] T. Siesfeld, J. Cefola, D. Neef (red.), The economic impact of knowledge, Butterworth and Heinemann, Boston-Oxford-Johannesburg-Melbourne-New Delhi-Singapore.
• Forsgren M. (2002), The concept of learning in the Uppsala internationalization process model: a critical review, "International Business Review", vol. 11(3), s. 257-277.
• García F., Jin B., Salomon R. (2013), Does inward foreign direct investment improve the innovative performance of local firms, "Research Policy", vol. 42(1), s. 231-244.
• Gemünden H.G., Ritter T., Heydebreck P. (1996), Network configuration and innovation success: An empirical analysis in German high-tech industries, "International Journal of Research in Marketing", vol. 13(5), s. 449-462.
• Ghoshal S., Bartlet C.A. (1988), Creation, adoption and diffusion of innovations by subsidiaries of multinational corporations, "Journal of International Business Studies", vol. 19(3), s. 365-388.
• Grant R.M. (1996), Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, "Strategic Management Journal", vol. 17(S2), s. 109-122.
• Gupta A.K., Govindarajan V. (2000), Knowledge flows within multinational corporations, "Strategic Management Journal", vol. 21(4), s. 473-496.
• Hagedoorn J., Cloodt M. (2003), Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators?, "Research Policy", vol. 32(8), s. 1365-1379.
• Håkansson H., Ford D., Gadde L.E., Snehota I., Waluszewski A. (2009), Business in networks, John Wiley Sons, Chichester.
• Håkansson H., Havila V., Pedersen A.C. (1999), Learning in networks, "Industrial Marketing Management", vol. 28(5), s. 443-452.
• Håkansson H., Johanson J. (1992), A Model of Industrial Networks, [w:] B. Axelsson, G. Easton (red.), Industrial Networks: A New View of Reality, Rutledge, London.
• Hessels S.J.A. (2007), Innovation and international involvement of Dutch SMEs, "International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business", vol. 4(3), s. 234-255.
• Hollenstein H. (1996), A composite indicator of a firm's innovativeness. An empirical analysis based on survey data for Swiss manufacturing, "Research Policy", vol. 25(4), s. 633-645.
• Ietto-Gillies G., London S.E. (2009), Conceptual issues behind the assessment of the degree of internationalization, "Transnational Corporations", vol. 18(3), s. 59-83.
• Inkpen A.C., Currall S.C. (2004), The coevolution of trust, control, and learning in joint ventures, "Organization Science", vol. 15(5), s. 586-599.
• Johanson J., Vahlne J.E. (1977), The internationalization process of the firm-a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments, "Journal of International Business Studies", vol. 8(1), s. 23-32.
• Johanson J., Vahlne J.E. (2009), The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership, "Journal of International Business Studies", vol. 40(9), s. 1411-1431.
• Kafouros M.I., Buckley P.J., Sharp J.A., Wang C. (2008), The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance, "Technovation", vol. 28(1), s. 63-74.
• Kale P., Singh H. (2007), Building firm capabilities through learning: the role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success, "Strategic Management Journal", vol. 28(10), s. 981-1000.
• Karlsen T., Silseth P.R., Benito G.R., Welch L.S. (2003), Knowledge, internationalization of the firm, and inward-outward connections, "Industrial Marketing Management", vol. 32(5), s. 385-396.
• Kotabe M., Srinivasan S.S., Aulakh P.S. (2002), Multinationality and firm performance: The moderating role of RD and marketing capabilities, "Journal of International Business Studies", vol. 33(1), s. 79-97.
• Leonidou L.C., Katsikeas C.S., Coudounaris D.N. (2010), Five decades of business research into exporting: A bibliographic analysis, "Journal of International Management", vol. 16(1), s. 78-91.
• Lewandowska M.S., Gołębiowski T. (2014), Innovation and international competitiveness of manufacturing firms. Evidence from Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Romania, [w:] A. Zhuplev, K. Liuhto (red.), Geo-Regional Competitiveness in Central and Eastern Europe, the Baltic Countries, and Russia, IGI Global/Taylor Francis Group, Hershey.
• Lewandowska M.S., Gołębiowski T., Szymura-Tyc M., Rószkiewicz M. (2017), Komplementarność innowacji a eksport nowych produktów, "Gospodarka Narodowa", nr 1, s. 96-117.
• Lewandowska M., Szymura-Tyc M., Gołębiowski T. (2016), Innovation complementarity, cooperation partner, and new product export: Evidence from Poland, "Journal of Business Research", vol. 69(9), s. 3673-3681.
• Love J.H., Roper S. (2001), Location and network effects on innovation success: evidence for UK, German and Irish manufacturing plants, "Research Policy", vol. 30(4), s. 643-661.
• March J.G. (1991), Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, "Organization Science", vol. 2(1), s. 71-87.
• Martínez-Ros E., Labeaga J.M. (2009), Product and process innovation: Persistence and complementarities, "European Management Review", vol. 6(1), s. 64-75.
• Mińska-Struzik E. (2014), Od eksportu do innowacji. Uczenie się przez eksport polskich przedsiębiorstw, Difin, Warszawa.
• Nieto M.J., Santamaría L. (2007), The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation, "Technovation", vol. 27(6), s. 367-377.
• Penner-Hahn J., Shaver J.M. (2005), Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms, "Strategic Management Journal", vol. 26(2), s. 121-140.
• Percival J.C., Cozzarin B.P. (2008), Complementarities affecting the returns to innovation, "Industry and Innovation", vol. 15(4), s. 371-392.
• Posner M.V. (1961), International trade and technical change, "Oxford Economic Papers", vol. 13(3), s. 323-341.
• Powell W.W., Koput K.W., Smith-Doerr L. (1996), Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology, "Administrative Science Quarterly", vol. 41(1), s. 116-145.
• Ritter T., Gemünden H.G. (2003), Network competence: Its impact on innovation success and its antecedents, "Journal of Business Research", vol. 56(9), s. 745-755.
• Roper S., Love J.H. (2002), Innovation and export performance: evidence from the UK and German manufacturing plants, "Research Policy", vol. 31(7), s. 1087-1102.
• Rothwell R. (1992), Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s, "RD Management", vol. 22(3), s. 221-240.
• Rycroft R.W., Kash D.E. (2004), Self-organizing innovation networks: implications for globalization, "Technovation", vol. 24(3), s. 187-197.
• Salomon R.M., Jin B. (2008), Does knowledge spill to leaders or laggards? Exploring industry heterogeneity in learning by exporting, "Journal of International Business Studies", vol. 39(1), s. 132-150.
• Salomon R.M., Shaver J.M. (2005), Learning by exporting: new insights from examining firm innovation, "Journal of Economics Management Strategy", vol. 14(2), s. 431-460.
• Shapiro C., Varian H.R. (1998), Information rules: a strategic guide to the network economy, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
• Sharma D.D., Blomstermo A. (2003), The internationalization process of born globals: a network view, "International Business Review", vol. 12(6), s. 739-753.
• Szymura-Tyc M. (2011), Międzynarodowe sieci innowacyjne - geneza i funkcjonowanie, "Zeszyty Naukowe SGH w Warszawie", nr 32, s. 420-438.
• Szymura-Tyc M. (2015a), Innovativeness and Internationalisation of the Polish Economy - the Transition Process Perspective, "Journal of Economics and Management", vol. 21(3), s. 5-20.
• Szymura-Tyc M. (2015b), Internacjonalizacja, innowacyjność i usieciowienia przedsiębiorstw. Podejście holistyczne, Difin, Warszawa.
• Szymura-Tyc M., Rollins M. (2016), Explorative Study on Internationalization, Innovativeness and Networking in Polish Firm, 32nd Annual IMP Conference Proceedings, Poznań.
• Tether B.S. (2002), Who co-operates for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis, "Research Policy", vol. 31(6), s. 947-967.
• Van Aken J.E., Weggeman M.P. (2000), Managing learning in informal innovation networks: overcoming the Daphne-dilemma, "RD Management", vol. 30(2), s. 139-150.
• Vernon R. (1966), International investment and international trade in the product cycle, "The Quarterly Journal of Economics", vol. 80(2), s. 190-207.
• Wakelin K. (1998), Innovation and export behaviour at the firm level, "Research Policy", vol. 26(7), s. 829-841.
• Welch L.S., Luostarinen R.K. (1993), Inward-outward connections in internationalization, "Journal of International Marketing", vol. 1(1), s. 44-56.
• Zahra S.A., Ireland R.D., Hitt M.A. (2000), International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance, "Academy of Management Journal", vol. 43(5), s. 925-950.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.18778/0208-6018.334.10