The Specificity of Regulatory Protectionism in Contemporary Foreign Trade Policy

• Autorzy: Zdzisław W. Puślecki

Warianty tytułu

Specyfika protekcjonizmu regulacyjnego we współczesnym handlu międzynarodowym

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In this research work, the author focuses on the analysis of the problem of specificity the regulatory protectionism in contemporary foreign trade policy. It has been emphasized that the talks between EU and USA will make reducing regulatory barriers. New agreements to remove trade barriers aim at reducing dead-weight costs and at increasing net social gains from international trade. The article examined the impact of investor-state dispute resolution mechanisms in reducing the power of national governments to regulate and elimination of market inequality. The article offers examples of successful regulatory cooperation efforts in the hope that it will shed light on possible approaches to addressing regulatory divergences. Ideally, the best way to address problems arising from regulatory divergence would be on a multilateral basis. The main aim of the article is the presentation of the specificity of the regulatory protectionism in contemporary foreign trade policy(original abstract)

Nowe tendencje do wzrostu protekcjonizmu regulacyjnego we współczesnym handlu międzynarodowym, rozszerzają się i stanowią poważne ograniczenia dla dalszego rozwoju zagranicznych kontaktów handlowych. Protekcjonizm regulacyjny dotychczas jest słabo rozpoznawalny w zagranicznej polityce handlowej. Może on wzrastać z powodu różnych przyczyn. Uzależnione jest to od celów jakie stawiają sobie poszczególne państwa. Protekcjonizm regulacyjny w określonym stopniu odnosi się do wzrastających w handlu międzynarodowym barier technicznych i fitosanitarnych. Należy zatem podejmować działania w zakresie harmonizacji przepisów i zarządzeń oraz wzajemnego uznawania różnego rodzaju norm w wymiarze narodowym. Równocześnie w zagranicznej polityki handlowej, coraz większego znaczenia nabierają porozumienia bilateralne. Celem opracowania jest przedstawienie specyfiki negatywnego oddziaływania protekcjonizmu regulacyjnego na współczesny handel międzynarodowy(abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Trade policy; Protectionism; Regulatory risk

PL

Polityka handlowa; Protekcjonizm; Ryzyko regulacyjne

• Czasopismo: Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
• Rocznik: 2018
• Numer: nr 509 Problemy ekonomii, polityki ekonomicznej i finansów publicznych
• Strony: 354--372

Twórcy

autor

Zdzisław W. Puślecki

• Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland

Bibliografia

• Berden K.G., Francois J., Thelle M., Wymenga P., Tamminen S., 2009, Non-tariff Measures in EU-US Trade and Investment - An Economic Analysis, ECORYS Nederland BV, Rotterdam.
• Buongiorno J., Rougieux P., Barkaoui A., Zhu S., Harou P., 2014, Potential impact of a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership on the global forest sector, Journal of Forest Economics, vol. 20, pp. 252-266.
• Ciuriak D., Lapham B., Wolfe R., Collins-Williams T., J.M. Curtis, 2011, Firms in International Trade: Towards a New Trade Policy, November, http://qed.econ.queensu.ca/pub/faculty/lapham/papers/NNTPNov14.pdf.
• Egan M., 2003, Constructing a European Market: Standards, Regulation and Governance, Oxford University Press, Oxford-New York.
• Egger P., Pfaffermayr M., 2011, Structural estimation of gravity models with path-dependent market entry, CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP8458, http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1889961.
• Felbermayr G., Heid B., Lehwald S., 2013a, Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP): Who benefits from a free trade deal?, Part 1: Macroeconomic effects, http://issuu.com/bertelsmannfoundation/docs/ttip-ged study.
• Felbermayr G., Larch M., Flach L., Yalcin E., Benz S., 2013b, Dimensionen und Auswirkungen eines
• Freihandelsabkommens zwischen der EU und den USA, Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Technologie, München.
• Francois J., Manchin M., Norberg H., Pindyuk O., Tomberger P., 2013, Reducing transatlantic barriers to trade and investment - an economic assessment, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London,http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/march/tradoc 150737.pdf. Hamilton D.S., 2014, TTIP's geostrategic implications, [in:] Hamilton D.S. (ed.), The Geopolitics of TTIP: Repositioning the Transatlantic Relationship for a Changing World, Center for Transatlantic Relations, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DC.
• HLWG, 2013, Final Report of the U.S.-EU High Level Working Group on Jobs and Growth, http://www.ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/reports-and-publications/2013/final-report-us-eu-hlwg.
• Jackson R.J., 2013, Global Politics in the 21st Century, Cambridge University Press, New York.
• Krist W., 2013, Globalization and America's Trade Agreements, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
• Lamy P., 2013, Putting Geopolitics Back at the Trade Table, speech at the IISS-Oberoi Discussion Forum in Delhi (29 January 2013), http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/sppl_e/sppl264_e.htm(15.11.2013).
• Lester S., Barbee I., 2013, The challenge of cooperation: Regulatory trade barriers in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, Journal of International Economic Law, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 847-867.
• OECD, 2005, The benefits of liberalising product markets and reducing barriers to international trade and investment: The case of the United States and the European Union, OECD Economics Department Working Paper, no. 432, http://search.oecd.org/officialdocuments/displaydocumentpdf/?doclanguage=en&cote=ECO/WKP 2005 19.
• OECD, 2013, The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: Why Does it Matter?, http://www.oecd.org/trade/TTIP.pdf (15.11.2013).
• Prusa T.J., Teh R., 2010, Protection reduction and diversion: PTAs and the incidence of antidumping disputes, NBER Working Papers, no. 16276.
• Ries C., 2014, The strategic significance of TTIP, [in:] Hamilton D.S. (ed.), The Geopolitics of TTIP: Repositioning the Transatlantic Relationship for a Changing World, Center for Transatlantic Relations, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Washington DC.
• Straubhaar T., 2014, TTIP: Don't lose momentum!, [in:] Hamilton D.S. (ed.), The Geopolitics of TTIP: Repositioning the Transatlantic Relationship for a Changing World, Center for Transatlantic Relations,
• Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DC.
• USTR, 2012, New United States-Israel Telecommunications Agreement Eases Way for U.S. Exports, http://www.ustr.gov/about-us/press-office/press-releases/2012/october/ us-israel-telecomm-mou-eases-way-for-exports (15.11.2013).
• Watson K.W., James S., 2013, Regulatory protectionism: A hidden threat to free trade, Policy Analysis, no. 723, http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/regulatory-protectionism-hidden-threat-free-trade (15.11.2013).
• WTO, 2013b, Proposed Agenda, WT/DSB/W/513, 23 September, 2013, https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE.../q/WT/DSB/W513.pdf.
• WTO, 2013c, WT/TPR/OV/W/7, Trade Policy Review Body, Report to the TPRB from the Director-General on Trade-Related Development (Mid-October 2012 to mid-May 2013), 5 July 2013 (13-3559), Page: 1/72.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15611/pn.2018.509.30