PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2018 | nr 2 (41) | 207--221
Tytuł artykułu

Using Subjective Equivalence Scales to Analyze Poverty in Poland

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The subjective equivalence scale for Poland in 2010 is estimated using the Polish Household Budget Survey. The scale increases consistently with household size, thus showing larger economies of scale than would be shown if the OECD approach was used. We compare the poverty rates based on the subjective scale with those obtained using expert approach. The overall poverty rates are not much different, but the choice of weighting methods leads to a significantly different distribution of poverty when different types of households are considered. In particular, according to the subjective approach, the one-person households are mostly at risk of financial poverty. This is opposite to the OECD approach, according to which larger households are more at risk. The results are consistent with those for the euro zone countries discussed in Bishop et al. (2014).(original abstract)
Słowa kluczowe
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
207--221
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Polish Academy of Sciences
Bibliografia
  • Bishop, J., A., Grodner, A., Liu, H., Ahamdanech-Zarco I., Subjective Poverty Equivalence Scales for Euro Zone Countries, "The Journal of Economic Inequality", vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 265-278, 2014.
  • Bishop, J., A., Luo, F., Pan, X., Economic Transition and Subjective Poverty in Urban China, "Review of Income and Wealth", vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 625-641, 2006.
  • Blundell, R., Lewbel, A., The Information Content of Equivalence Scales, "Journal of Econometrics", vol. 50, issue 1-2, pp. 49-68, 1991.
  • Bollinger, Ch. R., Cheti, N., Pudney S., Two Can Live as Cheaply as One... But Three's a Crowd, University of Essex, series: ISER Working Paper Series, no. 10/2012, 2012.
  • Buhmann, B., Rainwater, L., Smeeding, T. M., Equivalence Scales, Well-Being, Inequality and Poverty: Sensitivity Estimates Across Ten Countries Using the Luxemburg Income Study (LIS) Database", "Review of Income and Wealth", vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 115-142, 1988.
  • Coulter, F. A. E., Cowell, F. A., Jenkins, S. P., Differences in Needs and Assessment of Income Distributions, "Bulletin of Economic Research", vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 77-124, 1992.
  • de Ree, J., Alessiez, R., Pradhanx, M., The Price and Utility Dependence of Equivalence Scales: Evidence from Indonesia, "Journal of Public Economics", vol. 97, pp. 272-281, 2013.
  • Dudek, H., Statystyczna analiza subiektywnej oceny dochodów gospodarstw domowych rolników [The Statisitical Analysis of Subjective Assessment of Income Obtained by Farmers' Household], "Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych", series G 96 (4), pp. 41-49, 2009.
  • Dudek, H., Subiektywne skale ekwiwalentności - Analiza na podstawie danych o satysfakcji z osiąganych dochodów [Subjective Equivalence Scales - Analysis Based on Data on Satisfaction with income Earned], "Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics", no. 242, pp. 153-162, 2012.
  • Dudek, H., Landmesser, J., Income Satisfaction and Relative Deprivation ,"Statistics in Transition", 13(2), pp. 321-334, 2012.
  • Eurostat, Combating Poverty and Social Exclusion: A Statistical Portrait of the European Union 2010, Luxemburg: European Union, 2010.
  • Garner, T. I., Short, K. S., Personal Assessments of Minimum Income and Expenses: What Do They Tell Us about 'Minimum Living' Thresholds and Equivalence Scales? [in:] Bishop, J. A., Amiel, Y., (eds.) Inequality, Welfare and Poverty: Theory and Measurement, Research on Economic Inequality, pp. 191-243. Elsevier Science, 2003.
  • Goedhart, T., Halberstadt, V., Kepteyn, A., van Praag, B., The Poverty Line: Concept and Measurement, "Journal of Human Resources", vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 503-520, 1977.
  • GUS, Metodologia badania budżetów gospodarstw domowych [Methodology for Household Budgets Survey]. Central Statistical Office, Warsaw, 2011.
  • Kapteyn, A., The Measurement of Household Cost Functions. Revealed Preference versus Subjective Measures, "Journal of Population Economics", vol. 7, no. 4 , pp. 333-350, 1994.
  • Layard, R., Happiness and Public Policy: A Challenge to the Profession, "The Economic Journal", no. 116, pp. 24-33, 2006.
  • Lewbel, A., Pendakur, K., Equivalnence Scales [in:] Durlauf, S. N., Blume, L. (eds.) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, pp. 1-9. Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
  • Podgórski, J., Zastosowanie metody "Leyden Poverty Line" w warunkach Polski, [Application of the "Leyden Poverty Line" in Poland], "Wiadomości Statystyczne", no.11, pp. 5-9, 1990.
  • Podgórski, J., Subiektywne linie ubóstwa - nowe wyniki [Subjective Lines of Poverty - New Results], "Wiadomości Statystyczne", no. 11, pp. 6-12, 1991.
  • Podgórski, J., Metody wyznaczania subiektywnych linii ubóstwa [Methods of Determining Subjective Lines of Poverty], "Wiadomości Statystyczne", no. 12, pp. 12-19, 1994.
  • Pollak, R. A., Wales, T. J., Welfare Comparisons and Equivalence Scales, "American Economic Review", vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 216-221, 1979.
  • Stewart, M., The Estimation Of Pensioner Equivalence Scales Using Subjective Data, "Review of Income and Wealth", vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 907-929, 2009.
  • Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., Fitoussi, J-E, Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, Paris, 2009.
  • Ulman, P., Equivalence Scale in Terms of Polish Households' Source of Income, "Folia Oeconomica Stetinesia", no. 10 (18), Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego [the University of Szczecin Press], 2012.
  • Van Praag, B., The Welfare Function of Income in Belgium: An Empirical Investigation, "European Economic Review", vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 337-369, 1971.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171531970

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.