PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2018 | 14 | nr 1 | 27--38
Tytuł artykułu

Terminal Value Calculation In DCF Valuation Models : an Empirical Verification

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The paper presents an empirical verification of the main assumptions underlying the calculation of terminal value in DCF valuation models. The test results suggest that the volatility of free cash flows and the dynamism of the operating environment do not allow us to make a reliable long-term forecast of value creation potential of the public companies in Poland. Regardless of their organic growth phase, the overwhelming majority of the sampled firms are evidenced to exhibit extreme year-on-year fluctuations of sales, investments and cash flows over the short- and medium-term observation windows. The variability of operating results and the probabilistic nature of company-level fundamentals may preclude the possibility of constructing a reliable cash flow forecast for the purposes of a DCF valuation. This methodological issue appears to pose a particular challenge during the calculation of terminal value, which is heavily dependent on highly subjective and uncertain steady-state fundamentals. Therefore, the predictive power of the deterministic DCF models may be reduced to a snapshot of the current market sentiment regarding a particular stock. The paper postulates that a further discussion on the tenets of terminal value calculation may be necessary in order to overcome the existing flaws and increase the accuracy of valuation models. We contribute to this discussion by outlining the principal methodological and theoretical issues which challenge the practicing valuators at the stage of terminal value calculation. Our conclusions may help to shed light on the problems of market short-termism, and high inconstancy of investment recommendations. (original abstract)
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
14
Numer
Strony
27--38
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
  • Kozminski University, Warsaw, Poland
  • Kozminski University, Warsaw, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Amit, R., Shoemaker, P. (1993). Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 33-46.
  • Baele, L., Londono, J. (2013). Understanding Industry Betas. Journal of Empirical Finance, 22, 30-51.
  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
  • Blanc, S., Setzer, T. (2015). Analytical Debiasing of Corporate Cash Flow Forecasts. European Journal of Operational Research, 243(3), 1004- 1015.
  • Copeland, T., Koller, T., Murrin, J. (2010). Valuation, Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Damodaran, A. (2010). Applied Corporate Finance. Wiley.
  • Damodaran, A. (1994). Damodaran on Valuation: Security Analysis for Investment and Corporate Finance. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Estridge, J., Lougee, B. (2007). Measuring Free Cash Flows for Equity Valuation: Pitfalls and Possible Solutions. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 19 (2), 60-71.
  • Fabry, J., van Grembergen, W. (1978). Further Evidence on the Stationarity of Betas and Errors in their Estimates. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2(3), 189-204.
  • Gollier, C., Weitzman, M. (2010). How Should the Distant Future be Discounted when Discount Rates are Uncertain? Economics Letters, 107(3), 350-353.
  • Gordon, M. (1959). Dividends, Earnings and Stock Prices. Review of Economics and Statistics, 41(2), 99-105.
  • Graham, J., Harvey, C. (2001). The Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance: Evidence from the Field. Journal of Financial Economics, 60, 187-243.
  • Grant, R. (1991). The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.
  • IASB (2011). International Financial Reporting Standard 13 (Amended 2013).
  • International Valuation Standards Council IVSC (2017). The International Valuation Standards 2017 (www.ivsc.org).
  • Jackowicz, K., Mielcarz, P., Wnuczak, P. (2017). Fair Value, Equity Cash Flow and Project Finance Valuation: Ambiguities and a Solution. Managerial Finance, 8, 914- 927.
  • Jennergren, P. (2008). Continuing Value in Firm Valuation by the Discounted Cash Flow Model. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(3), 1548-1563.
  • Koutmos, G., Lee, U., Theodossiu, P. (1994). Time-varying Betas and Volatility Persistence in International Stock Markets. Journal of Economics and Business, 46(2), 101-112.
  • Learned, E., Christensen, K., Andrews, K., Guth, W. (1969). Business Policy: Text and Cases. Homewood: Irwin.
  • Lemmon, M., Roberts, M., Zender, J. (2008). Back to the Beginning: Persistence and the Cross-section of Corporate Capital Structures. The Journal of Finance, 68(4), 1575-1608.
  • Lundholm, R., O'Keefe, T. (2001). Reconciling Value Estimates from the Discounted Cash Flow Model and the Residual Income Model. Contemporary Accounting Research, 18(2), 311-335.
  • Mielcarz, P., Mlinaric, F. (2014). The Superiority of FCFF over EVA and FCFE in Capital Budgeting. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 27(1), 559-572.
  • Mielcarz, P., Osiichuk, D. (2017). What is Behind the Figures? Conceptual Mistakes in the Equity Valuations Prepared by Research Analysts in Poland. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 1/2017(85), 375-387.
  • Mielcarz, P, Wnuczak, P. (2011). DCF Fair Value Valuation, Excessive Assets and Hidden Inefficiencies. Contemporary Economics, 4, 44-57.
  • O'Brien, T. (2003). A simple and flexible DCF valuation formula. Journal of Applied Finance, 13(2), 54-62.
  • Pisano, G. (2015). A Normative Theory of Dynamic Capabilities: Connecting Strategy, Know-How, and Competition, Working Paper (No. 16-036).
  • Porter, M. (1980). Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press.
  • Shapiro, C. (1989). The Theory of Business Strategy. RAND Journal of Economics, 20(1), 135 -137.
  • Teece, D., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
  • Yezegel, A. (2015). Why do Analysts Revise their Stock Recommendations after Earnings Announcements? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 59(2-3), 163-181.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171535221

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.