Zakres i dynamika licencjonowania nowych rozwiązań technicznych w wybranych krajach europejskich

• Autorzy: Rafał Wisła

Warianty tytułu

Scope and Dynamics of the Technology Licensing in Selected European Countries

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

W artykule są prezentowane wyniki badań nad zakresem i dynamiką licencjonowania nowych rozwiązań technicznych w wybranych krajach europejskich. Dla osiągnięcia określonych w tekście artykułu celów badawczych wykorzystuje się zbiór metadanych patentowych Europejskiej Organizacji Patentowej oraz technologiczną tablicę łącznikową Światowej Organizacji Własności Intelektualnej. Biorąc pod uwagę udział licencjonowanych technologii danego kraju w całkowitej liczbie licencjonowanych technologii wszystkich krajów objętych badaniem, wyraźnym liderem jest Francja, druga plasuje się Wielka Brytania, trzecia Szwecja, a czwarte są Niemcy.(abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The aim of this paper is to present the results of the licensing industrial property research as one of the forms of commercialization in the selected European countries. To achieve this purpose, the collection of patent metadata for the member states of the European Patent Office (EPO) was used The WIPO IPC Technology Concordance Table. As a result of the research, some of the European countries were identified as leading in terms of the number of licensed patents, the dynamics of industrial property spread in the European economy was set, and the technology were established, in which the emerging new industrial solutions are the subject of the commercialization with the use of license contracts.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Technologia; Własność intelektualna; Potencjał innowacyjny; Innowacje techniczne

EN

Technology; Intellectual property; Innovation potential; Technical innovations

• Czasopismo: Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: 102
• Strony: 289--305

Twórcy

autor

Rafał Wisła

• Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Bibliografia

• Archibugi Daniele, Pianta Michie, Measuring technological through patents and innovation surveys, Technovation 1996/16/(9).
• Basberg Bjorn, Patents and the measurement of technological change: a survey of the literature, Research Policy 1987/16.
• Baudry Marc, Dumont Beatrice, Patent Renewals as Options: Improving the Mechanism for Weeding Out Lousy Patents, Review of Industrial Organization 2006/28/(1).
• Bell Martin, Pavitt Keith, Technological Accumulation and Industrial Growth: Contrasts Between Developed and Developing Countries, Industrial and Corporate Change 1993/2.
• Bogers Marcel, Bekkers Rudi, Granstrand Ove, Intellectual Property and Licensing Strategies in Open Collaborative Innovation, w: Heredero Carmen de Pablos, Berzosa David López (red.), Open Innovation at Firms and Public Administration: Technologies for Value Creation, Hershey, PA: IGI Global 2012.
• Chesbrough Henry, Open Innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston 2003.
• Freedman David, Pisami Robert, Purves Roger, Statistics, W.W. Norton & Company, New York 2007.
• Granstrand Ove, Industrial Innovation Economics and Intellectual Property (6th ed.), Gothenburg, Sweden: Svenska Kulturkompaniet 2011.
• Griliches Zvi, Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey, Journal of Economic Literature1990/28.
• Hall Bronwyn, Jaffe Adam, Trajtenberg Manuel, Market Value and Patent Citations, RAND Journal of Economics 2005/36.
• Hinze Sybille, Schmoch Ulrich, Opening the Black Box. Analytical approaches and their impact on the outcome of statistical patent analyses, w: Henk F. Moed, Wolfgang Glänzel, Ulrich Schmoch (red.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies on R&D Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London 2005.
• Lanjouw Jean, Patent Protection in the Shadow of Infringement: Simulation Estimations of Patent Value, The Review of Economic Studies 1998/65.
• Lanjouw Jean, Schankerman Mark, Stylised Facts of Patent Litigation: Value, Scope and Ownership, NBER working paper series, NBER, Cambridge 1997.
• Lanjouw Jean, Schankerman Mark, Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators, The Economic Journal 2004/114.
• Lichtenthaler Ulrich, External commercialization of knowledge: Review and research agenda, International Journal of Management Reviews 2005/7(4).
• Pakes Ariel, Patents as Options: Some Estimates of the Value of Holding European Patent Stocks, Econometrics 1986/54.
• Pavitt Keith, Patent statistics as indicators of innovation activities, Scientometrics 1985/7.
• Read Cathy, Survey of Intellectual Property Commercialization in the Higher Education Sector, 2003, Published by authority of the Minister responsible for Statistics, Canada, Ottawa 2005.
• Schankerman Mark, How Valuable is Patent Protection? Estimates by Technology Field, The RAND Journal of Economics 1998/29.
• Schankerman Mark, Pakes Ariel, Estimates of The Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During The Post-1950 Period, Economic Journal 1986/96.
• Schmoch Ulrich, Concept of a Technology Classification for Country Comparisons. Final Report to the World Intellectual Property Organisation, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe 2008.
• Thursby Jerry, Kemp Sukanya, Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing, Research Policy 2002/31.
• Touhill Joseph, Tuhill Gregory, O'Riordan Thomas, Commercialization of Innovative Technologies: Bringing Good Ideas to the Marketplace, Willey&Soons, New York 2008.
• Ziegler Nicole, Ruether Frauke, Bader Martin, Gassman Oliver, Creating value through external intellectual property commercialization: a disruptive capacity view, Journal of Technological Transfer 2013/38.