Risk Management in Biogas Plants Based on New Norm Iso 31000:2018

• Autorzy: Karolina Kapsa
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Biogas plays an important role in renewable energy production. Biogas plants are small-scale energy plants, facing numerous risks in daily operations. Production of biogas may cause danger for life and health by suffocation or poisoning due to presence of hydrogen sulphide (H2S) and explosion of reactor. The current literature study revealed that there are no universal and comprehensive management tools designed only for biogas plants for risk management. Therefore, the aim of this paper is application of new ISO 31000:2018 on risk management in biogas plants. For this, three crucial technical criteria: Organic loading rate (OLR), Hydraulic retention time (HRT) and Technical performance of a biogas plant were taken into account. These criteria have been analysed to present how the methodology of risk management norm can be applied in any other area. Further research is needed to develop additional criteria in technical, environmental, economic and social issues. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Risk management; ISO International Standards; Biogas

PL

Zarządzanie ryzykiem; Normy ISO; Biogaz

• Czasopismo: Research Journal of the University of Gdańsk. Transport Economics and Logistics
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 77 Transportation - Business Operations and Sustainable Development
• Strony: 59--72

Twórcy

autor

Karolina Kapsa

• DNV GL, Berlin, Germany

Bibliografia

• Angelopoulos, D. et al. (2017), Risk-based analysis and policy implications for renewable energy investments in Greece, Energy Policy, 105, pp. 512-523.
• Aven, T. (2011), On the new ISO guide on risk management terminology, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 96, pp. 719-726.
• Babaee Azadeh, J.S. (2011), Effect of organic loading rates (OLR) on production of methane from anaerobic digestion of vegetables waste. In: World Renewable Energy Congress 2011, Linköping, pp. 1-7.
• Barnert, T., Piesik, E. and Śliwiński, M. (2014), Real-time simulator of agricultural biogas plant, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 108, pp. 1-11.
• Benjamin, M.F.D., Tana, R.R. and Razon, L.F. (2015), Probabilistic multi-disruption risk analysis in bioenergy parks via physical input-output modeling and analytic hierarchy process, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 1, pp. 22-33.
• BP (2016), BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2016.
• Casson Moreno, V., Guglielmi, D. and Cozzani, V. (2018), Identification of critical safety barriers in biogas facilities, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 169, pp. 81-94.
• DGIZ (2010), Guide to biogas. From production to use, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit.
• Ecofys (2013), Sustainable biogas production. A handbook for organic farmers.
• Ellabban, O. (2014), Renewable energy resources: Current status, future prospects and their enabling technology, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, pp. 748-764.
• Fruteau de Laclos, H., Desbois, S. and Saint-Joly, C. (1997), Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid organic waste: Valorga full-scale plant in Tilburg, the Netherlands, Water Science and Technology, 36, pp. 457-462.
• Gatzert, N. and Kosub, T. (2016), Risks and risk management of renewable energy projects: The case of onshore and offshore wind parks, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, pp. 982-998.
• Gatzert, N. and Vogl, N. (2016), Evaluating investments in renewable energy under policy risks, Energy Policy, 95, pp. 238-252.
• Hitzeroth, M. and Megerle, A. (2013), Renewable energy projects: Acceptance risks and their management, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27, pp. 576-584.
• IRM (2018), A Risk Practitioners Guide to ISO 31000:2018. Review of the 2018 version of the ISO 31000 risk management guidelines and commentary on the use of this standard by risk professionals.
• Lee, C.W. and Zhong, J. (2015), Financing and risk management of renewable energy projects with a hybrid bond, Renewable Energy, 75, pp. 779-787.
• Leitch, M. (2010), ISO 31000:2009 - the new international standard on risk management, Risk Analysis, 30, pp. 887-892.
• Mata-Alvarez, J., Cecchi, F. and Llabrés, P. (1992), Anaerobic digestion of the Barcelona central food market organic wastes: experimental study, Bioresour Technol, 39, pp. 39-48.
• NFU Mutual (2018), Risk Management programme for biogas production by anaerobic digestion, Warwickshire.
• Nguyen, P.H.L., Kuruparan, P. and Visvanathan, C. (2007), Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste as a treatment prior to landfill, Bioresource Technology, 98, pp. 380-387.
• Nie, S. et al. (2017), Risk management of energy system for identifying optimal power mix with financial-cost minimization and environmental-impact mitigation under uncertainty, Energy Economics, 61, pp. 313-329.
• Rene Alvarez, G.L. (2008), Semi-continuous co-digestion of solid slaughterhouse waste, manure, and fruit and vegetable waste, Renewable Energy, 33, pp. 726-734.
• Rincón-Mejía, E. and de las Heras, A. (2008), Sustainable Energy Technologies, Boca Raton.
• Sgroi, F. et al. (2015), Economic evaluation of biogas plant size utilizing giant reed, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 49, pp. 403-409.
• Smith, R.S. and Cheesema, C.B.N. (2009), Waste Management and Minimization, Oxford.
• Swedish Gas Technology Centre (2012), Basic data on biogas. Available from: www.sgc.se/ckfinder/userfiles/files/BasicDataonBiogas2012.pdf [Accessed 6 March 2018].

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.26881/etil.2018.77.06