PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2018 | nr 1, cz. 1 | 155--172
Tytuł artykułu

Understanding Complexity Leadership : Lesson From Emerging Environment

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Przywództwo w warunkach złożoności - doświadczenia z działalności w warunkach rynków wyłaniających się
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
łączenia administracyjnej i adaptacyjnej funkcji przywództwa. Ponadto badane firmy, w zależności od tego, które z typów przywództwa były w nich dominujące, skłonne były do rozwoju swojej działalności w oparciu o odmienne instytucje otoczenia rynków wyłaniających się. Ujawnione tendencje mogą, w krótkim okresie, sugerować kierunek rozwoju organizacji. In the article, the author concentrates on the exploration of the nature of leadership behaviours and their impact on organisational performance in multinational enterprises (MNEs) in turbulent environments. The results of studies were to answer the following two questions. How and which leadership approach helps understand adaptive processes in an emerging environment? What are complex leadership behaviours of MNEs and how do they influence a successful organisational performance? The article begins with theoretical foundations for the perception of leadership in the light of assumptions resulting from the complexity theory. Then, the empirical context for deliberations, i.e. behaviours of international enterprises in the conditions of emerging markets, is presented. Relationships between leadership and results obtained by organisations were described on the basis of the quality attitude of the case study. The research sample included five small and medium-sized MNEs developing their business activity on emerging markets (EMs). The results exhibit two strategies of dealing with the complexity of phenomena, i.e. complexity reduction and complexity absorption. The aim of the first one is convergence, the latter one is divergent in a distinct way. Effectiveness in both cases requires different activities to combine the administrative and the adaptive functions of leadership. Moreover, in surveyed companies, depending on which leadership types were dominated, the organisations were inclined to develop their activities in different domains of the environment of the emerging market. These tendencies may, in short-term, suggest a possible direction of development of organisations. (original abstract)
Autorka koncentruje się na badaniu natury przywództwa i jego wpływu na działania organizacji w warunkach turbulentnego otoczenia. W rozważaniach skupiono się na szczególnym przypadku organizacji, jakim jest przedsiębiorstwo międzynarodowe (MNE). Wyniki badań odpowiadają na następujące pytania: które z możliwych, oraz w jaki sposób, podejście do przywództwa odpowiada na procesy adaptacyjne w nowym otoczeniu rynków wyłaniających się? Na czym polega przywództwo w warunkach złożoności w MNE i jak wpływa ono na rezultaty organizacji? Artykuł rozpoczyna przedstawienie podstaw teoretycznych w zakresie ujęcia przywództwa w świetle założeń wynikających z teorii złożoności. Następnie pokazano kontekst empiryczny rozważań, którym jest działalność MNE w warunkach rynków wyłaniających się. Część badawczą poświęcono określeniu związków między przywództwem a rezultatami uzyskiwanymi przez organizacje. W badaniach posłużono się metodą jakościową - studium przypadku. Próbą badawczą objęto pięć małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw wielonarodowych prowadzących działalność na rynkach wyłaniających się. Wyniki wskazały na dwie strategie radzenia sobie ze złożonością zjawisk, które polegały na redukcji (konwergencji) lub absorbcji (dywergencji) złożoności. Skuteczność działania w obu przypadkach wymaga odmiennego (abstrakt oryginalny)
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
155--172
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • University of Economics in Katowice, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Allen, P. (1998a). Evolving in social science. In G. Altman and W.A. Koch (eds.), Systems: New paradigms for the human science. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Allen, P. (1998b). Modelling complex economic evolution. In: F. Schwietzer and G. Silverberg (eds.), Selbstorganisation. Berlin, Duncker, Humblor.
  • Allen, P., Strathern, M., & Baldwin J. (2006). Evolution drive: New understanding of change in socio-economic systems. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 8(2), 229-238.
  • Allen, T.F.H., Allen, P.C., Malek, A., Flynn, J. and Flynn, M. (2009). Confronting economic profit with hierarchy theory: The concept of gain in ecology. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 26(5), 583-599. DOI: 10.1002/sres.998
  • Allen, T.F.H., Tainter, J.A., Flynn, J., Steller, R., Blenner, E., Pease, M. and Nielsen, K. (2010). Integrating economic gain in biosocial systems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27(5), 537-552. DOI: 10.1002/sres.1060
  • Allen, T.F.H., Tainter, J.A. and Hoekstra, T.W. (1999). Supply-side sustainability. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 16(5), 403-427. DOI: 10.7312/alle10586
  • Anderson, P.W. (1999). Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10(3), 216-232.
  • Barabba, V., Pourdehnad, J. and Ackoff, R.L. (2002). On misdirecting management. Strategy & Leadership, 30(5), 5-9. DOI: 10.1108/10878570210442498
  • Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise on the sociology of knowledge. London: Allen Lane.
  • Boisot, M. and Child, J. (1999). Organizations as adaptive systems in complex environments: The case of China. Organization Science, 10(3), 237-252. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.10.3.237
  • Brown, S.L. and Eisenhardt, K.M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1-34. DOI: 10.2307/2393807
  • Cantwell, J.A., Dunning, J.H. and Lundan, S.M. (2010). An evolutionary approach to under-standing international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4), 567-586. DOI: 10.1057/jihs.2009.95
  • Capra, F. (1996). The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems. New York: Doubleday.
  • Casti, J.L. (1994). Complexification. London: Abacus.
  • Chislip, D.D. (2002). The collaborative leadership fieldbook: A guide for citizens and civic leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Choo, Ch.W. and Bontis, N. (eds.). (2002). The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Corallo, A., Passiante, G. and Prencipe, A. (eds.). (2007). The digital business ecosystem. London: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Coupey, E. (2004). Digital business: Concepts and strategy. Upper Saddle River: Pearson /Prentice Hall.
  • Crosby, B.C. and Bryson, J.M. (2010). Integrative leadership and the creation and maintenance of cross-sector collaborations. Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 211-230. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.003
  • Curtin, J.L. (2004). Emergent leadership: Case study of a jury foreperson. Leadership Review, 4, 75-88.
  • DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. DOI: 10.2307/2095101
  • DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L.G. Zucker (ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3-21). Cambridge: Ballinger.
  • Dooley, K.J. and Van de Ven, A.H. (1999). Explaining complex organizational dynamics. Organization Science, 10(3), 358-372. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.10.3.373
  • Dziubińska, A. (2015). Konceptualna charakterystyka przedsiębiorstwa międzynarodowego - przedsiębiorstwo tradycyjne. Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 222, 34-52.
  • Dziubińska, A. (2017a). Strategie przedsiębiorstw międzynarodowych z teorią złożoności w tle. In K. Jędralska and W. Dyduch (eds.), Nauki o zarządzaniu. Dokonania, trendy, wyzwania (pp. 215-235). Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach.
  • Dziubińska, A. (2017b). Innowacja instytucjonalna w warunkach transformacji otoczenia. Studia i Materiały, 2(1), 48-59.
  • Eisenhardt, K.M. and Brown, L.S. (1999). Patching: Restitching business portfolios in dynamic markets. Harvard Business Review, 77(3), 72-82.
  • Eisenhardt, K.M. and Piezunka, H. (2011). Complexity theory and corporate strategy. In P. Allen, S. Maguire and B. McKelvey (eds.), The Sage handbook of complexity and management (pp. 506-523). London: Sage Publications.
  • Goldfinch, S.F. and Hart, P. (2003). Leadership and institutional reform: Engineering macroeconomic policy change in Australia. Governance, 16(2), 235 - 270. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0491.00215
  • Grant, R.M. (2000). Shifts in the world economy: The drivers of knowledge management. In C. Despres and D. Chauvel (eds.), Knowledge horizons: The present and the promise of knowledge management (pp. 27-54). Boston: Butterworth Heinemann.
  • Grant, R.M. (2002). The knowledge-based view of the firm. In C.W. Choo and N. Bontis (eds.), The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  • Hargrave, T.J. and Van De Ven A.H. (2006). A collective action model of institutional innovation. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 864-888. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.22527458
  • Hazy, J.K. (2006). Measuring leadership effectiveness in complex socio-technical systems. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 8(3), 58-77. DOI: 10.emerg/10.17357.35c842ca4c07405f1dd3545d3321f38f
  • Herdon, M., Várallyai, L. and Péntek, Á. (2012). Digital business ecosystem prototyping for SMEs. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 14(4), 286-301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13287261211279026
  • Holland, J. (1998). Emergence from chaos to order. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Hymer, S. (1976). The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Juarrero, A. (1999). Dynamics in action: Intentional behavior as complex systems. Boston: MIT Press.
  • Karakas, F. (2009). New paradigms in organization development: Positivity, spirituality and complexity. Organization Development Journal, 27(1), 11-26.
  • Kauffman, S.A. (1995). At home in the universe. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kaufmann, S.A. (1993). Origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Khanna, T. and Palepu, K.G. (2010). Winning in emerging markets: A road map for strategy and execution. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
  • Kingdon, J.W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. New York: Harper Collins.
  • Kostova, T. and Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64-81. DOI: 10.2307/259037
  • Langton, C.G. (1996). Artificial life. In S.A. Boden (ed.), The philosophy of artificial life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Laudon, K.C. and Laudon, J.P. (2013). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm (13th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
  • Levy, D. (1994). Chaos theory and strategy: theory, application, and managerial implications. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 167-178.
  • Lichtenstein, B.B., Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., Seers, A., Orton, J.D. and Schreiber, C. (2006). Complexity leadership theory: An interactive perspective on leading in complex adaptive systems. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 8(4), 2-12.
  • Lipman-Blumen, J. (1996). Connective leadership: Managing in a changing world. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Luke, J.S. (1998). Catalytic leadership: Strategies for an interconnected world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Maccoby.
  • Maguire, S., McKelvey, B., Mirabeau, L. and Öztas, N. (2006). Organizational complexity science. In: S. Clegg, C. Hardy, W. Nord and T. Lawrence (eds.), Handbook of organizational studies (2nd ed.) (pp. 165-214). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Marion, R. (1999). The edge of organization: Chaos and complexity theories of formal social systems. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Marion, R. and Uhl-Bien, M. (2003). Complexity v.transformation: The new leadership revisited (working paper). Clemson University, Clemson, SC.
  • McKelvey, B. (2001). Energizing order-creating networks of distributed intelligence. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5, 181-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919601000348
  • Mcquivey, J. (2013). Digital disruption: Unleashing the next wave of innovation. Las Vegas: Amazon Publishing.
  • Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363. DOI: 10.1086/226550
  • Meyer, J.W. and Scott, W.R. (eds.) (1983). Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
  • Nooteboom, S.G. and Termeer, C. (2013). Strategies of complexity leadership in governance systems. International Review of Public Administration, 18(1), 25-40. DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2013.10805238
  • North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511808678
  • North, D.C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Odum, H.T. and Obadum, E.C. (2006). The prosperous way down. Energy, 31(1), 21-32.
  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.1991.4279002
  • Osborn, R.N., Hunt, J.G. and Jauch, L.R. (2002). Towards a contextual theory of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 797-837.
  • Peng, M.W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 275-296.
  • Peng, M.W. and Heath, P. (1996). The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 492-528.
  • Powell, W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295-336.
  • Raffaelli, R. and Glynn, M.A. (2015). Institutional innovation: Novel, useful, and legitimate. In Ch.E. Shalley, M.A. Hitt and J. Zhou (eds.), The Oxford handbook of creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199927678.001.0001
  • Rokita, J. (in print). Zarządzanie strategiczne zasobami ludzkimi z perspektywy nauki o złożoności.
  • Rokita, J. and Dziubińska, A. (2016). Systemy złożone w zarządzaniu. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach.
  • Schmidt, E. and Cohen, J. (2013). The new digital age: Transforming nations, businesses, and our lives. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Scott, W.R. (2004). Reflections on a half-century of organizational sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 1-21.
  • Scott, W.R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. Thousands Oak: Sage.
  • Snowden, D. and Stanbridge, P. (2004). The landscape of management: Creating the context for understanding social complexity. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 6(1-2) (Special Double Issue), 140-148.
  • Stacey, R. (1996). Complexity and creativity in organizations. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  • Stacey, R.D. (2011). Strategic management and organisational dynamics. The challenge of complexity to ways of thinking about organisations. Harlow: Pearson.
  • Strader, T.J. (2010). Digital product management, technology and practice: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Hershey: IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61692-877-3
  • Surie, G. and Hazy, J. (2006). Generative leadership: Nurturing innovation in complex systems. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 8(4), 13-26.
  • Tapscott, D. (2015). The digital economy: Rethinking promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence (20th anniversary ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Thietart, R.A. and Forgues, B. (1995). Chaos theory and organization. Organization Science, 6, 19-31. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.6.1.19
  • Reynolds, C.W. (1987). Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model. Proceeding SIGGRAPH '87. Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques, 25-34.
  • Ray, T.S. (1991). An approach to the synthesis of life. In: C. Langton, C. Taylor, J.D. Farmer and S. Rasmussen (eds.), Artificial life II. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, XI, (pp. 371-408). Redwood City: Addison-Wesley.
  • Tsoukas, H. and Hatch, M.J. (2001). Complex thinking, complex practice: The case for a narrative approach to organizational complexity. Human Relations, 54(8), 979-1013.
  • Uhl-Bien, M., Ross, M. and McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298-318. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002
  • Uhl-Bien, M. and Ross, M. (2009). Complexity leadership in bureaucratic forms of organizing: A meso model. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 631-650. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.007
  • Williamson, O.E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.
  • Williamson, O.E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 269-296. DOI: 10.2307/2393356
  • Williamson, O.E. (1998). Ekonomiczne instytucje kapitalizmu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Zhichang, Z. (2007). Complexity science, system thinking and pragmatic sensibility. System Research and Behavioral Science, 24(4), 445-464. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sres.846
  • Zimmerman, M. and Zeitz, G. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414-431. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2002.7389921
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171544299

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.