Interdyscyplinarne i transdyscyplinarne aspekty zarządzania wiedzą dla zrównoważonego rozwoju w dziedzinie organizacji badań i nauczania

• Autorzy: Enrico Feoli

Warianty tytułu

Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Aspects of Knowledge Management for Sustainable Development at Research and Teaching Organizations

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper discusses the role of knowledge management for sustainable development in research and teaching organizations (RTOs) by stressing the need that they would develop a common model of making sense when trying to couple "scientific research and social goals" to solve the wicked problems of humanity related to poverty, land degradation and climate change. After recalling the central role of the "ugly duckling" theorem in knowledge management, the paper suggests the use of the ontology approach within the single disciplines in order to promote the interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary work. After considering the spatial dimension of the RTOs and the failure of the current use of science and technology to solve these wicked problems, this paper supports the idea of "rethinking development" on the basis of a paradigm of cooperation between RTOs of a transdisciplinary nature. The paper concludes that, notwithstanding an already active global computer network (Internet), it is necessary to develop and improve the research for adapting the "Web Evolution" to human needs. (original abstract)

W artykule omówiono rolę zarządzania wiedzą dla zrównoważonego rozwoju dziedzinie organizacji badań i nauczania (RTO), podkreślając potrzebę rozwoju wspólnego modelu nadającemu sens integracji "badań naukowych i celów społecznych" w celu rozwiązania trudnych problemów ludzkości związanych z ubóstwem, degradacją gleb i zmianami klimatycznymi. Po przypomnieniu centralnej roli "brzydkiego kaczątka" w teorii zarządzania wiedzą, w artykule sugeruje się zastosowanie podejścia ontologicznego w obszarze pojedynczych dyscyplin w celu promowania podejścia inter- i transdyscyplinarnego. Po rozważeniu przestrzennego wymiaru RTO oraz niewłaściwego aktualnego wykorzystania zdobyczy nauki i technologii, aby rozwiązać ww. problemy, artykuł popiera ideę "doskonalenia przemyślenia" na podstawie paradygmatu współpracy między podejściem RTO a podejściem o charakterze transdyscyplinarnym. W artykule stwierdza się, że niezależnie od już działającej globalnej sieci komputerowej (Internet), konieczne jest opracowywanie i doskonalenie badań dotyczących dostosowania "Ewolucji Web" do potrzeb człowieka. (abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Knowledge management; Sustainable development; Interdisciplinarity

PL

Zarządzanie wiedzą; Rozwój zrównoważony; Interdyscyplinarność

• Czasopismo: Studia i Materiały Polskiego Stowarzyszenia Zarządzania Wiedzą
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: 58
• Strony: 63--76

Twórcy

autor

Enrico Feoli

• University of Trieste

Bibliografia

• Acot P., Historie de l'écologie. Storia dell'ecologia, 1989 Italian translation, Locarini Editore Roma, 1988.
• Ahern J., Theories, methods and strategies for sustainable landscape planning, [w:] Tress B., Tress G., Fry G., Opdam P. (eds.) 2006. From landscape research to landscape planning: Aspects of integration, education and application. Springer, pp. 119-131, 2006.
• Angell I.O., Living with Uncertainty and Loving it. [w:] Forti A. ed. 1994. Manual for Training in Research and Innovation Management, World Scientific, Hong Kong, pp.1-9, 1994.
• Bandemer H., Mathematics of Uncertainty. Ideas, Methods, Application Problems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2010.
• Bartoli H., Rethinking Development. Putting an end to poverty. Editions UNESCO, Paris, 2000.
• Burgard S., Brand J., House J., Perceived Job Insecurity and Workers Health in the United States Report 08-650, Population Studies Center, University of Michigan Institute for Social Research. Ann Arbor, MI. USA, 2008. (Available from http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pubs/).
• Cavalli Sforza L.L., Menozzi P., Piazza R., The History and Geography of Human Genes. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1994.
• de Jong T., Ferguson-Hessler M.G.M., Types and Qualities of Knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 31(2): 105-113, 1996.
• Dini P., Rathbone N., Vidal M., Hermandez P., Ferronato P., Briscoe G., Hendryx S., The digital ecosystem research vision: 2010 and beyond European Commission, 2005. (Available from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_ecosystem).
• Fensel D., Decker S., Erdmann M., Studer R., 1998., Ontobroker: The Very High Idea. Eleventh International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, pp. 131- 135, 1998.
• Feoli E., Orlóci L., Can similarity theories contribute to the development of a general theory of the plant community? Community Ecology 12, pp. 135-141, 2011.
• Funtowicz, S.O., Ravetz J.R., A new scientific methodology for global environmental issues. [w:] Costanza R. ed., Ecological economics: the science and management of sustainability. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 137-152, 1991.
• Gruber T.R., A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowl. Acquis. 5, pp. 199-220, 1993.
• Hassam Z., Lai C.H., Ideals and Realities. Selected Essays of Adbus Salam. World Scientific. Singapore p. 369, 1984.
• Kates R.W., ed., Readings in Sustainability Science and Technology. CID Working Paper No. 213. Center for International Development, Harvard University. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, December 2010. (Available from http://www.hks.harvard.edu/centers/cid/publications/faculty-working-papers/cid-working- paper no.-213).
• Kelly K., New Rules for the New Economy. 10 ways the network economy is changing everything. Fourth Estate. London, 1998.
• Lorenz K., 'Der Abbau des Menschlichen' (The Waning of Humaneness), 1983. Italian translation. Il Declino dell'Uomo 1984. Mondadori p. 241, 1984.
• Ludwig D., The era of management is over. Ecosystems 4, pp. 758-764, 2001.
• Mayor F., Forti A., Science and Power. UNESCO publishing, p. 173, 1995.
• Mayor F., Scientific Research and Social Goals. Towards a New Development Model. Pergamon Press, Oxford, Frankfurt, 1982.
• Mayor F., Science and power today and tomorrow, [w:] Mayor F., Forti A. eds., 1995 Science and Power. UNESCO Publishing, pp.137-169, 1995.
• Rees W.E., Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out, "Environment and Urbanization" 4(2), pp. 121-130, 1992.
• Shadbolt N., Hall W.W., Berners-Lee T., The Semantic Web Revisited. "IEEE Intelligent Systems", 21(3) pp. 96-101, 2006.
• Smith B., Basic Concepts of Formal Ontology, [w:] Guarino N. ed., Formal Ontology in Information Systems IOS Press, Amsterdam, Washington DC. pp 19-28, 1998.
• Wackernagel M., Rees W., Perceptual and structural barriers to investigating in natural capital: Economics from an ecological footprint perspective. "Ecological Economics", Vol. 20(1), pp. 3-24, 1997.
• Watanabe S., Knowing and Guessing. A quantitative Study of Inference and Information, John Wiley & Sons, New York, Toronto p. 592, 1969.
• Weick K.E., Sense making in Organizations, Sage Publications, 1995; trad. it. Senso e significato nell'organizzazione, Raffaello Cortina Editore, Milano, 1997.
• Wilson E.O., Consilience, The Unity of Knowledge. Vintage, USA, 1999.