Some Reflections on Professor Malawski's Ideas Concerning Economics, Mathematics, and Philosophy

• Autorzy: Łukasz Hardt

Warianty tytułu

Refleksje na temat poglądów prof. A. Malawskiego na związki między ekonomią, matematyką i filozofią

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper explores the ways Prof. A. Malawski understood the various kinds of interplay between economics, mathematics, and philosophy. In particular, it addresses the issue of the mathematicity of the economy and what it means for economics to be a mathematical science. Next, it focuses on the nature of economic laws. It concludes by claiming that the interpretative key to Prof. Malawski's research lies in his deep humility. (original abstract)

W artykule podjęto rozważania na temat sposobu rozumienia przez prof. A. Malawskiego związków pomiędzy ekonomią, matematyką i filozofią. W szczególności analizie poddano kwestię matematyczności gospodarki, a także tego, jak należy rozumieć ekonomię traktowaną jako naukę matematyczną. Podjęto także problematykę natury praw ekonomicznych. Artykuł kończy się stwierdzeniem, że kluczem interpretacyjnym do badań prof. A. Malawskiego jest jego wyjątkowa pokora. (abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Philosophy of economics; Economic models; Economic sciences

PL

Filozofia ekonomii; Modele ekonomiczne; Nauki ekonomiczne

• Czasopismo: Argumenta Oeconomica Cracoviensia
• Rocznik: 2018
• Numer: no 19
• Strony: 9--22

Twórcy

autor

Łukasz Hardt

• University of Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• Carnap, R., Hahn, H. and Neurath, O. (1929) "The Scientific Conception of the World: The Vienna Circle" in M. Neurath and R. S. Cohen (eds) Otto Neurath: Empiricism and Sociology. Dordrecht-Boston 1973: D. Reidel Publishing Company, pp. 299-319.
• Colyvan, M. (2015) "Indispensability Arguments in the Philosophy of Mathematics" in E. N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Archive (Spring 2015 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/mathphil-indis/ (accessed: 1 February 2018).
• Dalmedico, A. D. (2001) "An Image Conflict in Mathematics after 1945" in U. Bottazzini and A. D. Dalmedico (eds) Changing Images in Mathematics: From the French Revolution to the New Millennium. London: Routledge, pp. 223-54.
• Davies, P. and Gribbin, J. (1992) The Matter Myth. London: Penguin Books.
• Debreu, G. (1991) "The Mathematization of Economic Theory". American Economic Review 81 (1): 1-7.
• Decock, L. (2002) "Quine's Weak and Strong Indispensability Argument". Journal for General Philosophy of Science 33 (2): 231-50, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022471707916.
• Field, H. H. (1980) Science Without Numbers: A Defence of Nominalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Guala, F. (2005) The Methodology of Experimental Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hardt, Ł. (2017) Economics without Laws. Towards a New Philosophy of Economics. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Jevons, W. S. (1879) The Theory of Political Economy. London: Macmillan and Co.
• Kitcher, P. (1984) The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Kołakowski, L. (2001) Metaphysical Horror. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Kuorikoski, J. (2017) "There Are No Mathematical Explanations". Unpublished manuscript, University of Helsinki.
• Lange, M. (2013) "What Makes a Scientific Explanation Distinctively Mathematical?". British Journal for the Philosophy of Sciences 64 (3): 485-511, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axs012.
• Lipton, P. (2004) "What Good Is an Explanation" in J. Cornwell (ed.) Explanations. Styles of Explanation in Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-21.
• Malawski, A. (1999) Metoda aksjomatyczna w ekonomii [The axiomatic method in economics]. Kraków: Ossolineum.
• Malawski, A. (2016) "Matematyzacja ekonomii: matematyczność czy matematyzowalność rzeczywistości gospodarczej" [The mathematisation of economics: mathematicalness or mathematicability of economic reality?] in M. Gorazda, Ł. Hardt and T. Kwarciński (eds) Metaekonomia. Zagadnienia z filozofii ekonomii [Metaeconomics. Problems of economic philosophy]. Kraków: CC Press, pp. 131-58.
• Marshall, A. (1890) Principles of Economics. First edition. London: Macmillan.
• Marshall, A. (1898) "Distribution and Exchange". Economic Journal 8 (29): 37-59, https://doi.org/10.2307/2956696.
• Marshall, A. (1906) "Letter to Bowley from February 27, 1906" in A. C. Pigou (ed.) Memorials of Alfred Marshall. New York 1966: A. M. Kelley, pp. 427-28.
• Marshall, A. (1920) Principles of Economics. Eighth edition. London: Macmillan.
• Mill, J. S. (1836) "On the Definition and Method of Political Economy" in D. Hausman (ed.) The Philosophy of Economics. Cambridge 2008: Cambridge University Press, pp. 41-58.
• Mill, J. S. (1843) A System of Logic. Ratiocinative and Inductive. London: John W. Parker.
• Mirowski, P. (2012) "The Unreasonable Efficacy of Mathematics in Modern Economics" in U. Mäki, D. M. Gabbay, P. Thagard, and J. Woods (eds) Philosophy of Economics. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 159-97.
• Pabjan, T. (2011) "Józefa Życińskiego koncepcja pola racjonalności" [Joseph Życiński's idea of the field of rationality]. Filozofia Nauki 19 (2): 7-18.
• Pareto, V. (1911) "Economie Mathématique" in Encyclopédie des Sciences Mathématiques. Volume IV. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.
• Putnam, H. (1979) Mathematics, Matter, and Method. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Quine, W. V. (1986) "Reply to Charles Parsons" in L. Hahn and P. Schilpp (eds) The Philosophy of W. V. Quine. La Salle: Open Court, pp. 396-403.
• Reutlinger, A. (2016) "Does the Counterfactual Theory of Explanation Apply to Non-Causal Explanations in Metaphysics?". European Journal for Philosophy of Science 7: 239-56, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-016-0155-z.
• Varian, H. R. (1992) Microeconomic Analysis. New York: W.W. Norton&Company.
• Warsh, D. (2006) Knowledge and the Wealth of Nations. New York: Norton.
• Whitehead, A. N. (1964) Science and Philosophy. Paterson NJ: Littlefield, Adams & Co.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15678/AOC.2018.1901