Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2018 | 26 | nr 4 | 2--10
Tytuł artykułu

A Discrepancy Between "What Should You Choose?" and "What Do You Choose?" in Intertemporal and Risky Decision-Making

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Purpose: When facing important decisions, people often ask themselves "What should I choose?" This question may involve intertemporal and risky decisions. The aim of our study was to test a potential discrepancy between the normative and descriptive perspective, that is, between "What should you choose?" and "What do you choose?".

Methodology: In this study we assessed the rate of delay and probability discounting of 236 participants. The design was a 2 ("choose"/"should choose") × 2 (small/large) × 5 (delays or probabilities) factorial design in delay and probability discounting.

Findings: People are less impulsive when taking the normative perspective than when they take the descriptive one. This phenomenon occurs in relation to large payoffs. However taking the normative rather than descriptive perspective makes no difference in risky decisions.

Research limitations: In further research it would be beneficial to study real outcomes as choice consequences and to control for variables that might moderate the impact of our manipulation, such as addictions.

Implications: The manipulation with the perspective may be applied not only in financial decision making. Our results may find a practical implementation to help impulsive people make more sensible decisions.

Originality: We demonstrated the internal conflict between the descriptive and normative mode in delay discounting decision making. (original abstract)
Opis fizyczny
  • SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Poland
  • SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Poland
  • Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
  • Ainslie, G. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, 82(4): 463-496,
  • Baker, F., Johnson, M.W. and Bickel, W.K. (2003). Delay discounting in current and never-before cigarette smokers: Similarities and differences across commodity, sign, and magnitude. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(3): 382-392,
  • Bazerman, M.H., Tenbrunsel, A.E. and Wade-Benzoni, K. (1998). Negotiating with Yourself and Losing: Making Decisions with Competing Internal Preferences. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2): 225-241,
  • Bechara, A. (2004). The role of emotion in decision-making: Evidence from neurological patients with orbitofrontal damage. Brain and Cognition, 55(1): 30-40,
  • Białaszek, W., Gaik, M., McGoun, E. and Zielonka, P. (2015). Impulsive people have a compulsion for immediate gratification"certain or uncertain. Frontiers in Psychology, 6,
  • Białek, M. and Sawicki, P. (2014). Can taking the perspective of an expert debias human decisions? The case of risky and delayed gains. Frontiers in Psychology, 5,
  • Brown, R. (1965). Social Psychology. New York: FreePress.
  • Coffey, S.F., Gudleski, G.D., Saladin, M.E. and Brady, K.T. (2003). Impulsivity and rapid discounting of delayed hypothetical rewards in cocaine-dependent individuals. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11(1), 18-25,
  • Du, W., Green, L. and Myerson, J. (2002). Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Discounting Delayed and Probabilistic Rewards. The Psychological Record, 52(4): 479-492,
  • Green, L., Fristoe, N. and Myerson, J. (1994). Temporal discounting and preference reversals in choice between delayed outcomes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(3): 383-389,
  • Green, L. and Myerson, J. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5): 769-792,
  • Green, L. and Myerson, J. (2010). Experimental and correlational analyses of delay and probability discounting. In: G.J. Madden and W.K. Bickel (eds.), Impulsivity: The behavioral and neurological science of discounting. Washington: American Psychological Association,
  • Green, L., Myerson, J., Lichtman, D., Rosen, S. and Fry, A. (1996). Temporal discounting in choice between delayed rewards: The role of age and income. Psychology and Aging, 11(1): 79-84,
  • Hsee, C.K. and Weber, E.U. (1997). A fundamental prediction error: self-other discrepancies in risk preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(1): 45-53,
  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2): 263-291,
  • Kyonka, E.G.E. and Schutte, N.S. (2018). Probability discounting and gambling: a meta-analysis. Addiction, 113(12): 2173-2181,
  • Lerner, J.S. and Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1): 146-159.
  • Levinger, G. and Schneider, D.J. (1969). Test of the "risk is a value" hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11(2): 165-169,
  • Loewenstein, G.F., Weber, E.U., Hsee, C.K. and Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2): 267-286,
  • Loewensten, G. (1996). Out of Control: Visceral Influences on Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3), 272-292,
  • Logue, A.W. (1988). Research on self-control: An integrating framework. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(04),
  • MacKillop, J., Amlung, M.T., Few, L.R., Ray, L.A., Sweet, L.H. and Munafò, M.R. (2011). Delayed reward discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis. Psychopharmacology, 216(3): 305-321,
  • MacKillop, J., Anderson, E.J., Castelda, B.A., Mattson, R.E. and Donovick, P.J. (2006). Divergent Validity of Measures of Cognitive Distortions, Impulsivity, and Time Perspective in Pathological Gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22(3): 339-354,
  • Madden, G.J. and Bickel, W.K. (2010). Impulsivity. The behavioral and neurological science of discounting. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Madden, G.J., Petry, N.M., Badger, G.J. and Bickel, W.K. (1997). Impulsive and self-control choices in opioid-dependent patients and non-drug-using control patients: Drug and monetary rewards. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 5(3): 256-262,
  • Madden, G.J., Petry, N.M. and Johnson, P.S. (2009). Pathological gamblers discount probabilistic rewards less steeply than matched controls. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 17(5): 283-290,
  • Myerson, J., Green, L. and Warusawitharana, M. (2001). Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76(2): 235-243,
  • O'Connor, K.M., De Dreu, C.K.W., Schroth, H., Barry, B., Lituchy, T.R. and Bazerman, M.H. (2002). What We Want to Do Versus What We Think We Should Do: An Empirical Investigation of Intrapersonal Conflict. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(5): 403-418,
  • Prelec, D. and Bodner, R. (2003). Self-signaling and self-control. Time and Decision,
  • Rabin, M. and Thaler, R.H. (2001). Anomalies: Risk Aversion. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1): 219-232,
  • Rachlin, H. (1995). Self-control: Beyond commitment. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18(01): 109-121,
  • San Martín, R. (2012). Event-related potential studies of outcome processing and feedback-guided learning. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(November): 1-17,
  • Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799): 280-285.
  • Slovic, P., Finucane, M.L., Peters, E. and MacGregor, D.G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3): 1333-1352,
  • Worthy, D.A., Byrne, K.A. and Fields, S. (2014). Effects of emotion on prospection during decision-making. Frontiers in Psychology, 5,
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.