The new Keynesian Trade-off Between Output and Inflation : Time Series Based Evidence from Russia

• Autorzy: Chin Hong Puah , Chong-Yang Sim , Mui-Yin Chin , M. Affendy Arip
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

As oil exports remain the main source of income for the Russian economy, the ongoing plunging of global oil prices is causing severe adverse supply shock and cost-push inflation in the country. The recent attempts at stabilisation policies by the policymakers have not been very successful in stabilising both national output and inflation. This has brought about concern over the relevance of policymaker interventions in the Russian economy. We investigate this matter by applying Asai's (1999) model. Our empirical results indicated that the trade-off between output and inflation in the short run in Russia is inversely associated with the mean rate of inflation, which supports the new Keynesian view. As such, stabilisation policies, particularly monetary policies adopted by policymakers, are extremely crucial in moderating the short-run trade-off between output and inflation with respect to the recent financial crisis. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Inflation; Production; Neokeynesian; Supply shock

PL

Inflacja; Produkcja; Neokeynesizm; Wstrząs podażowy

• Czasopismo: Business and Economic Horizons
• Rocznik: 2019
• Numer: vol. 15, iss. 1
• Strony: 126--136

Twórcy

autor

Chin Hong Puah

• Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Malaysia

autor

Chong-Yang Sim

• Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Malaysia

autor

Mui-Yin Chin

• Tunku Abdul Rahman University College, Malaysia

autor

M. Affendy Arip

• Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Malaysia

Bibliografia

• Addison, J. T., Chappell, H. W., & Castro, A. C. (1986). Output-inflation tradeoffs in 34 countries. Journal of Economics and Business, 38(4), 353-360.
• Akaev, A. A., Ziyadullaev, N. S., Sarygulov, A. I., & Sokolov, V. N. (2016). Medium-term forecast of the dynamics of the development of the Russian economy. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 27(5), 510-517.
• Asai, M. (1999). Time series evidence on a new Keynesian theory of the output-inflation trade-off. Applied Economic Letters, 6(9), 539-541.
• Asirim, O. (1995). Output inflation tradeoff: Evidence from Turkey (Discussion Paper No. 9506). Turkey: The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.
• Avsar, R. B., & Gur, T. H. (2004). How relevant is the new (Keynesian) Philips curve?The case of Turkey. Journal of Economic Cooperation, 25(4), 89-104.
• Baeriswyl, R., & Cornand, C. (2010). Optimal monetary policy in response to cost-push shocks: The impact of central bank communication. International Journal of Central Banking, 6(2), 31-52.
• Bakas, D., & Chortareas, G. (2018). Inflation dynamics and the output-inflation trade-off: International panel data evidence (Working Paper No. 2018/3). Data Analytics for Finance & Macro Research Centre.
• Ball, L., Mankiw, N. G., & Romer, D. (1988). The new Keynesian economics and the output-inflation tradeoff. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 19(1), 1-82.
• Benigno, P., & Ricci, L. A. (2011). The inflation-output trade-off with downward wage rigidities. American Economic Review, 101(4), 1436-1466.
• Bhattarai, K. (2016). Unemployment-inflation trade-offs in OECD countries. Economic Modelling, 58, 93-103.
• Bildirici, M. E., & Sonustun, F. O. (2018). Backward bending structure of Phillips curve in Japan, France, Turkey and the U.S.A. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 537-549.
• Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedascity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307-327.
• Brissimis, S. N., & Magginas, N. S. (2008). Inflation forecasts and the new Keynesian Philips curve. International Journal of Central Banking, 4(2), 1-22.
• Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427-431.
• Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057-1072.
• Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987-1007.
• Fal'tsman, V. K. (2016). Problems of structural, investment and innovation policy in the crisis period. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 27(4), 367-373.
• Fendel, R., & Rulke, J. C. (2012). Some international evidence on the Lucas supply function. Economics Letters, 114(2), 157-160.
• Froyen, R. T., & Waud, R. N. (1985). Demand variablility, supply shocks and the output-inflation tradeoff. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(1), 9-15.
• Giorgioni, G. (2001). New evidence on the output-inflation trade-off from developing economies: The case of the CFA Franc zone. Applied Economics, 33(8), 1077-1082.
• Greenwald, B., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1987). Keynesian, new Keynesian and new classical economics. Oxford Economic Papers, 39(1), 119-133.
• Holmes, M. J. (2000). The output-inflation trade-off in African less developed countries. Journal of Economic Development, 25(1), 41-55.
• Idrisov, G., Ponomarev, Y., & Sinelnikov-Murylev, S. (2016). Terms of trade and Russian economic development. Russian Journal of Economics, 2(3), 279-301.
• Ilyashenko, V. V., & Kuklina, L. N. (2017). Inflation in modern Russia: Theoretical foundations, specific features of manifestation and regional dimension. Ekonomika Regiona, 13(2), 434-445.
• Ivanova, M. A. (2016). Analysis of the nature of cause-and-effect relationship between inflation and wage in Russia. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 27(5), 575-584.
• Ivanter, V. V., Dzh. Govtvan', O., Gusev, M. S., Yu. Ksenofontov, M., Kuvalin, D. B., Moiseev, A. K., . . . Shirov, A. A. (2018). System of measures to recovery of economic growth in Russia. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 29(1), 1-5.
• Katsimbris, G. M., & Miller, S. (1996). The new Keynesian economics and the output-inflation trade-off. Applied Economics Letters, 3(9), 599-602.
• Kobbi, I., & Gabsi, F. (2017). The nonlinearity of the new Keynesian Phillips curve: The case of Tunisia. Economies, 5(3), 1-12.
• Liew, V. K., Lim, K. P., & Puah, C. H. (2006). New evidence on the output-inflation trade-off from ASEAN-5 economies. The ICFAI Journal of Applied Economics, 5(2), 16-25.
• Lucas, R. E. (1973). Some international evidence on output-inflation tradeoffs. The American Economic Review, 63(3), 326-334.
• McCaw, S., & Morka, K. H. (2005). Monetary policy and the trade-off between inflation and output variability. In S. Gjedrem, & H. Snellingen, Economic Bulletin 1/2005 (pp. 42-49). Norway: Norges Bank.
• Mironov, V. (2015). Falling into the abyss or a window of opportunity? Russian Journal of Economics, 1(3), 217-239.
• Puah, C. H., Habibullah, M. S., & Ong, H. B. (2005). Output-inflation trade-off in the Asian countries. In A. Z. Baharumshah, Open Economy Macroeconomics in East Asia (pp. 49-57). England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
• Said, S. E., & Dickey, D. A. (1984). Testing for unit roots in autoregressive-moving average models of unknown order. Biometrika, 71(3), 599-607.
• Schwert, G. W. (1987). Effects of model specification tests for unit roots in macroeconomic data. Journal of Monetary Economics, 20, 73-103.
• Sim, C. Y., Puah, C. H., Chin, M. Y., & Wong, H. N. (2015). Assessing the output-inflation trade-off for the case of Brazil. Journal of Academy of Business and Economics, 15(3), 107-112.
• Sinyakov, A., & Yudaeva, K. (2016). Central bank policy under significant balance-of-payment shocks and structural shifts. Russian Journal of Economics, 2(3), 246-278.
• Sun, R. (2014). Nominal rigidity and some new evidence on the new Keynesian theory of the output-inflation tradeoff. International Economics and Economic Policy, 11(4), 575-597.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15208/beh.2019.8