Start-Up Ecosystems as A Framework for The Cooperation Between Start-Upcompanies and Knowledge-Based Institutions in Poland

• Autorzy: Agnieszka Domańska

Warianty tytułu

Ekosystemy startapowe jako ramy współpracy pomiędzy nowo utworzonymi przedsiębiorstwami a instytucjami opartymi na wiedz w Polsce

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the article is to outline the picture of the Polish start-up ecosystem (in fact consisted of few ecosystems but functioning under the same scheme), i.e. its main actors and relations among them with the special focus put on the ways and "channels" the cooperation between start-ups and knowledge-based institutions (later termed K-BI) are to be realized(original abstract)

Istotną składową tzw. ekosystemów startupowych w różnych krajach stanowi współpraca sieciowa pomiędzy tego typu firmami a instytucjami wiedzy, jak uniwersytety, instytuty badawcze i inne ośrodki naukowe, a także z samymi naukowcami. Celem artykułu jest prezentacja struktury podmiotowej ekosystemów w Polsce w kontekście relacji pomiędzy startupami i tymi instytucjami. Analizując to zagadnienie należy zwrócić uwagę, że kooperacja ta może przybierać różne formy w zależności od stopnia sformalizowania omawianych kontaktów(abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Startup; Cooperation

PL

Przedsiębiorstwo typu start-up; Współpraca

• Czasopismo: Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
• Rocznik: 2018
• Numer: nr 536 Alert dla polityki spójności - gospodarka, zrównoważony rozwój, konkurencyjność
• Strony: 49--59

Twórcy

autor

Agnieszka Domańska

• SGH Warsaw School of Economics

Bibliografia

• Aarstad J., Haugland A., Greve A., 2010, Performance spillover effects in entrepreneurial networks:
• Assessing a dyadic theory of social capital, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, no. 34(5), pp. 1003-1019.
• Aldrich H.E, Zimmer C., 1986, Entrepreneurship through Social Networks, [in:] D. Sexton, R. Smiler (eds.), The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship, New York, Ballinger, pp. 3-23.
• Almeida P., Kogut B., 1997, The exploration of technological diversity and geographic localization in innovation: Start-up firms in the semiconductor industry, Small Business Economics, February, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp. 21-31.
• Armington C., Acs Z.J., 2002, The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation, Regional Studies, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp. 33-45.
• Bechky B., 2003, Shared meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of knowledge of a production floor, Organizational Sciences, no. 14, pp. 312-330.
• Birley S., 1985, The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process, Journal of Business Venturing, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp. 107-117.
• Burgel O., Murray G.C., 2000, The international market entry choices of start-up companies in high-technology industries, Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 33-62.
• Coleman J.S., 1988, Social capital in the creation of human capital, The American Journal of Sociology, no. 94, pp. 95-120.
• Colombo M.G., Delmastro M., Grilli L., 2004, Entrepreneurs' human capital and the start-up size of new technology-based firms, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Volume 22, Issues 8-9, November, pp. 1183-1221.
• Doutriaux J., 1992, Emerging high-tech firms: How durable are their comparative start-up advantages?, Journal of Business Venturing, Volume 7, Issue 4, July, pp. 303-322.
• Gans J.G., Hsu D.H., Stern S., 2000, When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction?, NBER Working Paper, no. 7851, August.
• Gatewood E.J., Shaver K.G., Gartner W.B., 1995, A longitudinal study of cognitive factors influencing start-up behaviors and success at venture creation, Journal of Business Venturing, Volume 10, Issue 5, September, pp. 371-391.
• Görg H.E., Strobl E., Ruane F., 2000, Determinants of firm start-up size: An application of quantile regression for Ireland, Small Business Economics, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp. 211-222.
• Granovetter M., 1973, The strength of weak ties, The American Journal of Sociology, no. 76(6), pp. 1360-1381.
• Hagedoorn J., Schakenraad J., 1992, Leading companies and networks of strategic alliances in information technologies, Research Policy, no. 21, pp. 163-190.
• Hayter Ch.S., 2013, Conceptualizing knowledge-based entrepreneurship networks: perspectives from the literature, Small Business Economics, no. 41, pp. 899-911.
• Huyghebaert N., Gaeremynck A., Roodhooft F., Van de Gucht L.M., 2000, New firm survival, the effects of start-up characteristics, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, no. 27 (5-6), pp. 627-651.
• Jack S.L., 2010, Approaches to studying networks: Implications and outcomes, Journal of Business Venturing, no. 25(1), pp.130-137.
• Knoke D., Yang S., 2008, Social Network Analysis, Thousand Oaks, Sage.
• Lechner C., Dowling M., Welpe I., 2006, Firm networks and firm development: The role of the relational mix, Journal of Business Venturing, no. 21(4), pp. 514-540.
• Lynskey M.J., 2004, Determinants of innovative activity in Japanese technology-based start-up firms, International Small Business Journal, Vol. 22(2).
• Mata J., Portugal P., Guimarães P., 1995, The post-entry performance of firms, the survival of new plants: Start-up conditions and post-entry evolution, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Volume 13, Issue 4, December, pp. 459-481.
• Peña I., 2002, Intellectual capital and business start-up success, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 3, Issue 2, pp.180-198.
• Sandberg A., Arts T., 2011, Agile collaborative research: Action principles for industry-academia collaboration, IEE Software.
• Scheinberg S., MacMillan I., 1988, An eleven-country study of the motivation to start a business, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson College, Wellesley MA.
• Scott J., 1994, Regional Advantage, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
• Terpstra D.E., Olson P.D., 1993, Entrepreneurial start-up and growth: a classification of problems, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Spring, pp. 5-20.
• Walker G., Kogut B., Shan W., 1997, Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network, Organization Science, no. 8(2), pp. 109-125.\
• Wright M., Clarysse B., Mustar P., Lockett A., 2007, Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
• Zimmer C., Aldrich H., 1987, Resource mobilization through ethnic networks: Kinship and friendhip ties of shopkeepers in England, Sociological Perspective, no. 30, pp. 422-445.
• COM/2011/0808 Horizon 2020 - The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation - Communication from the Commission.
• COM/2011/0822 Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Strategic Innovation Agenda of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT): the contribution of the EIT to a more innovative Europe.
• European Startup Monitor 2015, Creating Transparency for Startups in Europe, European Startup Network, German Startup Association.
• European Startup Monitor 2016, European Startup Network, German Startup Association.
• Global Startup Ecosystem Report 2012, Startup Genome, November.
• Global Startup Ecosystem Report 2015, Startup Genome, July.
• Global Startup Ecosystem Report 2017, Startup Genome, March.
• Global Startup Ecosystem Report 2018, Succeeding in the New Era of Technology, Startup Genome, 17th April.SEC(2011) 1427 Final Commission Staff Working Paper Impact Assessment - The
• Framework Programme for Research and Innovation; Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing Horizon 2020 - the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020).
• https://mambiznes.pl/wlasny-biznes/wiadomosci/12-mld-zl-e-dotacji-otrzymaly-startupy-jakie-sa-efekty-9048.
• https://parp.gov.pl.
• Polska 2030. Trzecia fala nowoczesności, Ministerstwo Administracji i Cyfryzacji.
• Strategia Rozwoju Kraju 2020, 2012, Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego RP, September.
• Strategia na Rzecz Odpowiedzialnego Rozwoju, 2017, MIIR, Warszawa.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15611/pn.2018.536.04