The Structure of Polish Research on the Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services

• Autorzy: Piotr Lupa , Małgorzata Stępniewska
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Ecosystem services (ES) concept has been popular among researchers in the last several years. In this paper, we assessed the development and trends in Polish ES research in the period 2010- 2016 using the content analysis of 84 scientific papers - the outcome of ECOSERV Symposia. We analysed such attributes as the type, dimension and scale of the study, ecosystems and ES investigated, the system used to name or classify ES, data used, as well as the considered policy and business questions. In addition, we compared the Polish studies with the European research in the database developed in the ESMERALDA project. The conducted study provides insight into the major achievements as well as challenges that the Polish ES research community will have to face. The findings may serve a discussion on how future directions of the research can be shaped in order to mainstream ES into environmental management. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Ecosystem; Services; Literature review

PL

Ekosystem; Usługi; Przegląd literatury

• Czasopismo: Ekonomia i Środowisko
• Rocznik: 2019
• Numer: nr 1 (68)
• Strony: 8--19

Twórcy

autor

Piotr Lupa

• Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland

autor

Małgorzata Stępniewska

• Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland

Bibliografia

• Albert C. et al. (2017), Map interpretation/end-user issues, in: B. Burkhard, J. Maes (eds), Mapping Ecosystem Services, Sofia, p. 290-293.
• Burkhard B. et al. (2018), Mapping and assessing ecosystem services in the EU - Lessons learned from the ESMERALDA approach of integration, "One Ecosystem" No. 3: e29153.
• Costanza R. et al. (1997), The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital, "Nature" No. 387, p. 253-260.
• Daily G.C. (1997), Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, Washington.
• Haines-Young R., Potschin M. (2013), Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V4.3., www.cices.eu [29-11-2018] http://www.maes-explorer.eu/page/1 [29-11-2018].
• Jiang W. (2017), Ecosystem services research in China: A critical review, "Ecosystem Services" No. 26, p. 10-16.
• Kabish N. (2015), Ecosystem service implementation and governance challenges in urban green space planning - The case of Berlin, Germany, "Land Use Policy" No. 42, p. 557-567.
• Kruse M., Petz K. (2017), Mapping provisioning services, in: B. Burkhard, J. Maes (eds), Mapping Ecosystem Services, Sofia, p. 189-198.
• Lupa P., Mizgajski A. (2014), The influence of the data analysis scale on the estimated size of ecosystem services, "Ekonomia i Środowisko" No. 4(51), p. 125-136.
• Maes J. et al. (2018), Which questions drive the mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy? "One Ecosystem" No. 3: e25309.
• Maes J. (2016), Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services (MAES): highlights and uncertainties of a science-policy interface on biodiversity and ecosystem services, "Ekonomia i Środowisko" No. 4(59), p. 52-64.
• Maes J. et al. (2012), Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union, "Ecosystem Services" No. 1(1), p. 31-39.
• Mączka K. et al. (2016), Application of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy - a systematic empirical analysis of national level policy documents in Poland, "Ecological economics" No. 128, p. 169-176.
• Mizgajski A. et al. (2014), Development of the ecosystem services approach in Poland, "Ekonomia i Środowisko" No. 4(51), p. 10-19.
• Mizgajski A. (2004), Problemy percepcji idei zrównoważonego rozwoju w naukach przyrodniczych, in: A. Graczyk (ed.), Zrównoważony rozwój w teorii ekonomii i w praktyce, Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu, p. 171-180.
• Mizgajski A., Stępniewska M. (2012), Ecosystem services assessment for Poland - challenges and possible solutions, "Ekonomia i Środowisko" No. 2(42), p. 54-73.
• Palomo I. et al. (2017), Tools for mapping ecosystem services, in: B. Burkhard, J. Maes (eds), Mapping Ecosystem Services, Sofia, p. 72-76.
• Piwowarczyk J. et al. (2013), Marine ecosystem services in urban areas: Do the strategic documents of Polish coastal municipalities reflect their importance? "Landscape and Urban Planning" No. 109, p. 85-93.
• Ryszkowski L. (1995), Managing ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes, "Natural Resources" No. 31, p. 27-36.
• Santos-Martin F. et al. (2018), Creating an operational database for Ecosystems Services Mapping and Assessment Methods, "One Ecosystem" No. 3: e26719.
• Seppelt R. et al. (2011), A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: Approaches, shortcomings the road ahead, "Journal of Applied Ecology" No. 48, p. 630-636.
• Solon J. et al. (2017), Świadczenia ekosystemowe w krajobrazie młodoglacjalnym. Ocena potencjału i wykorzystania, Warszawa.
• Stępniewska M. et al. (2018), Drivers of the ecosystem services approach in Poland and perception by practitioners, "Ecosystem Services" No. 33, p. 59-67.
• Stępniewska et al. (2017), Possibilities of using the concept of ecosystem services at the regional level in experts' opinions, "Ekonomia i Środowisko" No. 1(60), p. 81-91.
• Stępniewska M. (2016), Ecosystem Service Mapping and Assessment as a Support for Policy and Decision Making, "CLEAN - Soil, Air, Water" No. 44(10), p. 1414-1422.
• Vihervaara et. al. (2018), Biophysical mapping and assessment methods for ecosystem services, Deliverable D3.3 EU Horizon 2020 ESMERALDA Project, Grant agreement No. 642007, http://ESMERALDA-project.eu/getatt.php?filename= ESMERALDA D3.3_14966.pdf [29-11-2018].
• Zalewski M. (2004), Ecohydrology as a system approach for sustainable water biodiversity and ecosystem services, "Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology" No. 4, p. 229-235.
• Żylicz T. (2000), Costing Nature in a Transition Economy. Case Studies in Poland, Chelthenham.

Identyfikatory

DOI

https://doi.org/10.34659/2wt7-h184