A Hybrid Version of Well-being : an Attempt at Operationalisation

• Autorzy: Tomasz Kwarciński , Paweł Ulman
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Objectives: This paper aims to investigate the possibility of constructing a hybrid version of well-being and making an attempt at its operationalisation.
Research Design & Methods: The theoretical framework is based on the capability approach of Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum, while the empirical part of the paper refers to a fuzzy set theory.
Findings: We propose three measures of hybrid well-being, referring to (1) the minimum formula, (2) a mobility index, and (3) the concept of internalities.
Implications / Recommendations: We are convinced that it is not only possible to create a philosophically informed measure of well-being, but also that this kind of measure can be crucial in the context of public policy due to its sensitivity to autonomy and adaptation problems.
Contribution / Value Added: Findings of this research can be seen as an attempt to merge philosophical investigation with economics theories and applications. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Prosperity; Social welfare; Quantification of prosperity; Operationalization; Well-being

PL

Dobrobyt; Dobrobyt społeczny; Kwantyfikacja dobrobytu; Operacjonalizacja; Dobrostan

• Czasopismo: Zarządzanie Publiczne / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie
• Rocznik: 2018
• Numer: nr 4 (46)
• Strony: 30--49

Twórcy

autor

Tomasz Kwarciński

• Cracow University of Economics, Poland

autor

Paweł Ulman

• Cracow University of Economics, Poland

Bibliografia

• Alexandrova, A. (2017). A Philosophy for the Science of Well-being. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Alkire, S. (2002). Dimensions of human development. World Development, 30(2), 181-205.
• Betti, G. et al. (2006). On the construction of fuzzy measures for the analysis of poverty and social exclusion. Statistica & Applicazioni, 4(1), 77-97.
• Boelhouwer, J. & Noll, H. (2014). Objective quality of life. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Dordrecht - Heidelberg - New York - London: Springer.
• Cerioli, A. & Zani, S. (1990). A fuzzy approach to the measurement of poverty. In C. Dagum (Ed.), Income and Wealth Distribution, Inequality and Poverty (pp. 272-284). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
• Cheli, B. (1995). Totally fuzzy and relative measures of poverty in dynamic context. Metron, LIII(3-4), 183-205.
• Cummins, R. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model. Social Indicators Research, 52(1), 55-72.
• Dolan, P. & Peasgood, T. (2008). Measuring well-being for public policy: Preferences or experiences? The Journal of Legal Studies, 37(S2), S5-S31.
• Kagan, S. (2009). Well-being as enjoying the good. Philosophical Perspectives, 23(1), 253-272.
• Kraut, R. (2007). What is Good, and Why. The Ethics of Well-Being. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
• Kraut, R. (2013). Desire and the human good. In R. Shafer-Landau (Ed.), Ethical Theory: An Anthology (pp. 286-293). Wiley-Blackwell.
• Nussbaum, M. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9(2), 33-59.
• Panek, T. (2011). Ubóstwo, wykluczenie społeczne i nierówności. Teoria i praktyka pomiaru. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
• Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and Persons. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Raj, Ch. (2015). Behavioral economics and public policy: A pragmatic perspective. American Economic Review, 105(5), 1-33.
• Seligman, M. (2011), Flourish. North Sydney, Australia: William Heinemann.
• Sen, A. (2005). Commodities and Capabilities. Delhi - New York: Oxford University Press.
• Tatarkiewicz, W. (1976). Analysis of Happiness. Warsaw: PWN.
• Tiberius, V. (2014). Well-being, philosophical theories of. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Dordrecht - Heidelberg - New York - London: Springer.
• Ulman, P. & Soltes E. (2015). The monetary and nonmonetary aspects of poverty in Poland and Slovakia. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 3(1), 61-73.
• Woodard, C. (2015). Hybrid theories. In G. Fletcher (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Well-Being (pp. 161-174). Abingdon: Routledge.
• Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15678/ZP.2018.46.4.03