Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: options and threats on a local level policy formulation, especially in a phase of its formulation through declared priorities created by stakeholders.
THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: unclear relation between stakeholders and their hierarchy in the case, and unknown options how to improve examination process between them; about method, content analysis is used in the defined case (case study).
THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: starts with content analysis of all documents about public transportation in Pilsen, continues with stakeholder relation analysis and summarizing patterns of public policy creation which depict possible problems - options how to solve them followed.
RESEARCH RESULTS: there is a mutual harmony of public transport documents in Pilsen, but it depends on one stakeholder without proper rule to make the final decision in policy formulation; research options could be focus on informal practises; there could be problem with a lack of information if the whole policy is depended on one stakeholder (analytically informant), who do not want to participate.
CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: to combine formal information in examined documents with adding informal perceptions of stakeholders (non-structured interviews are recommended); to distinguish stakeholders with direct decision making power from those, who "only" prepare strategies; to focus on agenda setting of those stakeholders that prepare strategies - they formulate problem, so they create policy informally. (original abstract)
THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: unclear relation between stakeholders and their hierarchy in the case, and unknown options how to improve examination process between them; about method, content analysis is used in the defined case (case study).
THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: starts with content analysis of all documents about public transportation in Pilsen, continues with stakeholder relation analysis and summarizing patterns of public policy creation which depict possible problems - options how to solve them followed.
RESEARCH RESULTS: there is a mutual harmony of public transport documents in Pilsen, but it depends on one stakeholder without proper rule to make the final decision in policy formulation; research options could be focus on informal practises; there could be problem with a lack of information if the whole policy is depended on one stakeholder (analytically informant), who do not want to participate.
CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: to combine formal information in examined documents with adding informal perceptions of stakeholders (non-structured interviews are recommended); to distinguish stakeholders with direct decision making power from those, who "only" prepare strategies; to focus on agenda setting of those stakeholders that prepare strategies - they formulate problem, so they create policy informally. (original abstract)
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
9--23
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
- University of West Bohemia, Czech Republic
Bibliografia
- Brugha, R. & Varvasovszky, Z. (2000). Stakeholder Analysis: a Review. Health Policy and Planning, 15(3), 239-246.
- Company Register, POVED. (2018). Prague: Company Register.
- Kalous, J. & Veselý, A. (2006). Vybrané problémy vzdělávací politiky. In: Vybrané problémy vzdělávací politiky. Praha: Karolinum.
- Kraft, M.E. & Furlong, S.R. (2015). Public policy. Politics, analysis, and alternatives. Los Angeles & London: Sage.
- Negotiation of the City Representatives from 19. 4. 2018 (2018, April). Pilsen: Municipality of Pilsen city.
- Peters, G.B. (2013). Strategies for comparative research in political science. London & New York: Palgrave.
- Pilsen - System of Calm Transport, Requests for Parking Places Solutions (2018). Pilsen: The Department for Conceptions and City Development.
- Plzen.eu (2018, May). Pilsen: Information (Web)System of Pilsen.
- PMDP - Management of the Company (2018, May). Pilsen: PMDP.
- Potůček, M. et al. (2016). Veřejná politika. Praha: C.H. Beck.
- Prell, Ch., Hubacek, K., & Reed, M. (2009). Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management. Society and Natural Resources, 22(6), 501-518.
- Record of Negotiation between the DCCD and PMDP from 10. 2. 2017. (2018, February). Pilsen: The Department for Conceptions and City Development.
- Resolution of the City Representatives from 19. 4. 2018. (2018, April). Pilsen: Municipality of Pilsen city.
- Resolution of the Council of UMO4 from 14. 3. 2018. (2018, March). Pilsen: UMO4.
- Schema of Organization PMDP. (2017). Pilsen: PMDP.
- The Charter of the DCCD. (2017, December). Pilsen: Municipality of Pilsen city.
- The Constitution of the Czech Republic, Constitutional Law no. 1/1993. (1993, January). The Czech Republic.
- The General Conception for Calm Transport in Pilsen. (2012, March). Pilsen: The Department for Conceptions and City Development.
- The General Conception for Calm Transport in Pilsen. (2016). Pilsen: The Department for Conceptions and City Development.
- The General Conception for Calm Transport in Pilsen with Attachments A (Proposal), B (Analysis) and C (Other papers). (2018). Pilsen: The Department for Conceptions and City Development.
- The Principles for City Transport Development. (2011, April). Pilsen: Municipality of Pilsen city.
- The Spatial Plan of Pilsen. (2016). Pilsen: Municipality of Pilsen city.
- The Statutory of Pilsen City, document no. 8. (2001). Pilsen: Municipality of Pilsen city.
- The Strategic City Plan, Transport. (2016). Pilsen: Municipality of Pilsen city.
- The Transport Policy Principles of Pilsen. (1996). Pilsen: Municipality of Pilsen city.
- Umo2.plzen.eu, Targets and Competences. (2018, May). Pilsen: UMO2.
- UMO3 Council Negotiation from 12. 3. 2018. (2018, March). Pilsen: UMO3.
- Umo3.plzen.eu, Targets and Competences. (2018, May). Pilsen: UMO3.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171553269