Indywidualna orientacja przedsiębiorcza: konceptualizacja, pomiar i ocena

• Autorzy: Jarosław Karpacz

Warianty tytułu

Individual Entrepreneurial Orientation: Conceptualization, Measurement and Assessment

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie konceptualizacji i narzędzi pomiaru indywidualnej orientacji przedsiębiorczej. Jego realizacja była oparta na wynikach studiów literatury oraz wynikach ilościowych badań empirycznych, które przeprowadzono w celowo dobranej dużej organizacji prowadzącej działalność w sektorze IT. Badaniem objęto 478 pracowników tej organizacji niebędących menedżerami. Na podstawie rezultatów tych prac badawczych udowodniono istnienie indywidualnej orientacji przedsiębiorczej, a zatem pewnej wartości na najniższym poziomie w hierarchii organizacyjnej. Ponadto ustalono, że pracownicy uaktywniając swoje zachowania przedsiębiorcze jako zachowania poza rolą, będą mogli doświadczać wysokich wyników. Kontynuowanie prac badawczych nad zależnościami między orientacją przedsiębiorczą pracowników a osiąganymi przez nich wynikami wpisuje się w sugerowany kierunek badań mający na celu lepsze zrozumienie relacji pomiędzy tymi zmiennymi na poziomie indywidualnym(abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The aim of this article is to present conceptualization and individual entrepreneurial orientation measurement tools. It was based on the results of the scientific literature studies and quantitative results of empirical research, which was conducted in a large organization of IT sector activities that was intentionally selected. The research included 478 non-managerial employees of this organization. Basing on the results of the research work it was proved that there was the existence of individual entrepreneurial orientation as a certain value at the lowest level in the organizational hierarchy. Moreover, it was established that the employees who activated their entrepreneurial behaviors as extra-role behavior would be able to experience high results. The continuation of research work on the relationship between the entrepreneurial orientation of employees and the results achieved by them is the part of the direction of research suggested that aims to better understanding of relations between these variables on the individual level(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Orientacja przedsiębiorcza; Pomiar dokonań

EN

Entrepreneurial orientation; Performance measurement

• Czasopismo: Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
• Rocznik: 2018
• Numer: nr 538 Zarządzanie strategiczne w teorii i praktyce
• Strony: 172--182

Twórcy

autor

Jarosław Karpacz

• Uniwersytet Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach

Bibliografia

• Amabile T.M., Conti R., Coon H., Lazenby J., Herron M., 1996, Assessing the work environment for creativity, Academy of Management Journal, no 39.
• Baum J.R., Locke E.A., Smith K.G., 2001, A multidimensional model of venture growth, The Academy of Management Journal, vol. 44, no 2.
• Bettencourt L.A., Bond III E.U., Cole M.S., Houston M.B., 2017, Domain-relevant commitment and individual technical innovation performance, Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 34, no 2.
• Birdi K., Leach D., Magadley W., 2016, The relationship of individual capabilities and environmental support with different facets of designers' innovative behavior, Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 33, no 1.
• Busenitz L.W., Barney J.B., 1997, Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making, Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 12, no 1.
• Chisholm T.A., 1987, Intrapreneurship and bureaucracy, Advanced Management Journal, vol. 52, no 3.
• Covin J.G., Lumpkin G.T., 2011, Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: Reflections on a needed construct, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 35, no 5, s. 855-872.
• Covin J.G., Miller D., 2013, International entrepreneurial orientation: Conceptual considerations, research themes, measurement issues, and future research directions, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, vol. 38, no 1.
• Covin J.G., Slevin D.P., 1991, A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, vol. 15, no 1.
• De Clercq D., Dimov D., Thongpapanl N., 2010, The moderating impact of internal social exchange processes on the entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationship, Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 25, no 1.
• Dess G.G., Ireland R.D., Zahra S.A., Floyd S.W., Janney J.J., Lane P.J., 2003, Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship, Journal of Management, vol. 29, no 3.
• Frese M., Fay D., 2001, Personal initiative: An active performance concept for in the 21st Century, Research in Organizational Behavior, no 23.
• Gosling S.D., Vazire S., Srivastava S., John O.P., 2004, Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires, Amarican Psychologist, vol. 59, no 2.
• Hayton J.C., 2005, Promoting corporate entrepreneurship through human resource management practices: a review of empirical research, Human Resource Management Review, vol. 15, no 1.
• Hayton J.C., Kelley D.J., 2006, A competency-based framework for promoting corporate entrepreneurship, Human Resource Management, vol. 45, no 3.
• Ireland R.D., Covin J.G., Kuratko D.F., 2009, Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 33, no 1.
• Kanter R.M., 1985, Supporting innovation and venture development in established companies, Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 1, no 1.
• Karpacz J., 2016, Autonomia w kontekście orientacji przedsiębiorczej, Organizacja i Kierowanie, nr 4.
• Konovsky M.A., Pugh S.D., 1994, Citizenship behavior and social exchange, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 37, no 3.
• Krot K., Lewicka D., 2011, Human side of innovation-individual and organisational environment-related aspects: the Case of IBM, International Journal of Innovation and Learning, vol. 9, no 4.
• Kwiotkowska A., 2017, Wymiary orientacji przedsiębiorczej - wyniki badań empirycznych, Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, nr 1974.
• Miller D., 1983, The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms, Management Science, vol. 29, no 7.
• Monsen E., Boss W., 2009, The impact of strategic entrepreneurship inside the organization: Examining job stress and employee retention, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, vol. 33, no 1, s. 71-104.
• Moriano J., Molero F., Topa G., Mangin J.-P.L., 2011, The influence of transformational leadership and organizational identification on intrapreneurship, International Entrepreneurship & Management Journal, vol. 10, no 1.
• Slevin D.P., Terjesen S.A., 2011, Entrepreneurial orientation: Reviewing three papers and implications for further theoretical and methodological development, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 35, no 5.
• Wakkee I., Elfring T., Monaghan S., 2010, Creating entrepreneurial employees in traditional service sectors, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, vol. 6, no 1.
• Wiklund J., Davidsson P., Audretsch D.B., Karlsson C., 2011, The future of entrepreneurship research, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 35, no 1.
• Wiklund J., Shepherd D.A., 2011, Where to from here? EO-as-experimentation, failure, and distribution of outcomes, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 35, no 5.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15611/pn.2018.538.13