PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2019 | 15 | nr 1 Towards Success in a Competitive Market: The Importance of Entrepreneurship and Innovation | 147--169
Tytuł artykułu

How Entrepreneur Personality Affects Agrirural Entrepreneurial Alertness

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Academic research on agrirural entrepreneurship and opportunity recognition is scant. Because of this research gap, a series of three studies were conducted to develop a measure of entrepreneurial alertness (EA) in agrirural environments that is empirically valid and easy to administer and to analyze how the personality traits of agrirural entrepreneurs affect their EA. The results indicated that both extroversion and openness affected all of the dimensions of EA, whereas conscientiousness only affected scanning and searching and agreeableness only affected evaluation and judgment. The results also demonstrated interactive relationships between extroversion and openness for all of the dimensions of EA. Our results provide a new understanding of how agrirural EA can be assessed more practically and how personality traits can predict various dimensions of agrirural EA. (original abstract)
Badania akademickie w zakresie przedsiębiorczości agrarnej i rozpoznawania szans są niewielkie. Z powodu tej luki badawczej przeprowadzono serię trzech badań, aby rozwinąć miarę czujności przedsiębiorczej (EA) w środowiskach agroturystycznych, która jest empirycznie ważna i łatwa w administrowaniu oraz analizuje, w jaki sposób cechy osobowości przedsiębiorców rolnych wpływają na ich EA. Wyniki pokazały, że zarówno ekstrawersja, jak i otwartość wpłynęły na wszystkie wymiary EA, podczas gdy sumienność wpłynęła tylko na skanowanie i wyszukiwanie, a ugodowość wpłynęła tylko na ocenę i osąd. Wyniki pokazały również interaktywne zależności między ekstrawersją a otwartością dla wszystkich wymiarów EA. Nasze wyniki zapewniają nowe zrozumienie, w jaki sposób EA można ocenić bardziej praktycznie i jak cechy osobowości mogą przewidywać różne wymiary EA agriruralnego. (abstrakt oryginalny)
Twórcy
  • National Taiwan University, Taiwan
Bibliografia
  • Ariani, D.W. (2013). Personality and learning motivation. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(10), 26- 38.
  • Bachnik, K., & Szumniak-Samolej, J. (2018). Social initiatives in food consumption and distribution as part of sustainable consumption and sharing economy. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 14(2), 101-122.
  • Baer, M., Oldham, G., Jacobsohn, G.C., & Hollingshad, A.B. (2008). The personality composition of teams and creativity: The moderating role of team creative confidence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(4), 255-282.
  • Baron, R.A. (2006). Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs "connect the dots to identify new business opportunities." Academy of Management Journal, 20(1), 104-119.
  • Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K., & Judge, T.A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1/2), 9-30.
  • Bernardin, H.J., Cooke, D.K., & Villanova, P. (2000). Conscientiousness and agreeableness as predictors of rating leniency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 232-236.
  • Brandstätter, H. (2011). Personality aspects of entrepreneurship: A look at five meta-analyses. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(3), 222-230.
  • Chen, C.-C., Yueh, H.-P., & Liang, C. (2016). Strategic management of agribusiness: Determinants and trends. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 12(4), 69-97.
  • Chia, C.-C. & Liang, C. (2016). Influence of creativity and social capital on the entrepreneurial intention of tourism students. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 12(2), 151- 168.
  • Cropley, D.H. (2010). The dark side of creativity: A differentiated model. In D.H. Cropley, J. Kaufman, A.J. Cropley, & M.A. Runco (Eds.), The Dark Side of Creativity (pp. 360-373). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Del-Corte-Lora, V., Vallet-Bellmunt, T., & Molina-Morales, F.X. (2015). Be creative but not so much. Decreasing benefits of creativity in clustered firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 27(1-2), 1-27.
  • Dutta, D.K., & Crossan, M.M. (2005). The nature of entrepreneurial opportunities: Understanding the process using the 4I organizational learning framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 425-449.
  • Estahbanaty, S.S.M. (2013). How to increase agricultural entrepreneurial skills. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(3), 1244-1251.
  • Flora, C.B., & Flora, J.L. (1990). Developing entrepreneurial rural communities. Sociological Practice, 8(1), 197-207.
  • Gaglio, C.M., & Katz, J.A., (2001). The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small Business Economics, 16(2), 95- 111.
  • Goldberg, L.R. (1992). The development of makers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26- 42.
  • Hayes, A.F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41(3), 924-936.
  • Ilies, R., Johnson, M.D., Judge, T.A., & Keeney, J. (2011). A within-individual study of interpersonal conflict as a work stressor: Dispositional and situational moderators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(1), 44-64.
  • Janowski, A. (2018). Personality traits and sales effectiveness: The life insurance market in Poland. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 9(2), 5-28.
  • Khan, M.T., Khan, N.A., Ahmed, S., & Ali, M. (2012). Entrepreneurship development: One of the ways of rural development through rural human resource development (a review). International Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 2(8), 14-23.
  • Kirzner, I.M. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 60-85.
  • LePine, J.A. (2003). Team adaptation and postchange performance: Effects of team composition in terms of members' cognitive ability and personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 27-39.
  • Liang, C.-T., Peng, L.-P., Yao, S.-N., & Liang, C. (2015). Developing the social enterprise performance scale and examining the effects of entrepreneurs' personality traits. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 11(3), 89-116.
  • Lim, W.L., Lee, Y. L.-E., Ramasamy, R. (2015). Personality, prior knowledge, social capital and entrepreneurial intentions: Entrepreneurial alertness as mediator. Global Journal of Business and Social Science Review, 1(2), 538-548.
  • Liu, H.-C., Ip, C. Y., & Liang, C. (2018). A new runway for journalists: On the intentions of journalists to start social enterprises. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 14(2), 83-100.
  • Lumpkin, G.T., & Lichtenstein, B.B. (2005). The role of organizational learning in the opportunity-recognition process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 451-472.
  • Luna-Reyes, L. F., Durán- Encalada, J. A., & Bandala, E. R. (2013). Exploring alternatives for sustainable development in the Tamiahua wetlands. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 9(2), 5-28.
  • McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T., Jr. (1991). The NEO personality inventory: Using the five-factor model in counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69(4), 367- 372.
  • McMullen, J.S., & Shepherd, D.A. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 132-152.
  • Niemelä, T. (2015). Farm entrepreneurs' intentions to develop pluriactive business activities in Finland. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 11(3), 117-141.
  • Omri, A., & Boujelbene, Y. (2015). Entrepreneurial team: How human and social capital influence entrepreneurial opportunity identification and mobilization of external resources. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 11(3), 25- 42.
  • Pease, C. R., & Lewis, G. J. (2010). Personality links to anger: Evidence for trait interaction and differentiation across expression style. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 159-164.
  • Heidari-Sareban, V. (2012). Factors affecting farmers boost entrepreneurship in rural areas: A case in Meshginshahr, Geography, 35, 263-278.
  • Saxena, S. (2012). Problems faced by rural entrepreneurs and remedies to solve it. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 3(1), 23-39.
  • Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurship opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448-469.
  • Shane, S., Nicolaou, N., Cherkas, L., & Spector, T.D. (2010). Do openness to experience and recognizing opportunities have the same genetic source? Human Resource Management, 49(2), 291-303.
  • Shepherd, D.A., & DeTienne, D.R. (2005). Prior knowledge, potential financial reward, and opportunity identification. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(1), 91-112.
  • Swickert, R.J., Hittner, J.B., & Foster, A. (2010). Big Five traits interact to predict perceived social support. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 736-741.
  • Tang, J., Kacmar, K.M., & Busenitz, L. (2012). Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), 77-94.
  • Thompson, E.R. (2008). Development and validation of an International English Big-Five Mini-Markers. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(6), 542-548.
  • Van Der Molen, H.T., Schmidt, H.G., & Kruisman, G. (2007). Personality characteristics of engineers. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(2), 495-501.
  • Wilson, K., & Morren Jr., G. E.B. (1990). Systems Approaches for Improvement in Agriculture and Resource Management. New York: Macmillan.
  • Wolff, H.-G., & Kim, S. (2012). The relationship between networking behaviors and the big five personality dimensions. Career Development International, 17(1), 43-66.
  • Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The Big Five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 259-271.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171553993

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.