PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2017 | 2 | nr 2 | 48--55
Tytuł artykułu

A Systematic Review Approach of Mobile Technology Adoption in Higher Education

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Many educators agree that mobile technology has great potential not only to improve our educational practices but also to change traditional learning platforms and classroom learning environments. There are also many advantages to integrating mobile technology into the 21st century classrooms to support teaching and learning. Mobile technology tools such as iPads, iPad mini, mobile applications, tablets, palm devices, e-readers and smartphones are becoming real-world tools that should be integrated into modern instructional practices to support digital learners and to promote meaningful learning. Educators are harnessing mobile devices within and beyond the classroom due to the flexibility, portability, affordability and popularity of those devices. This study explores the effectiveness of mobile technology adoption within 21st century classrooms processes and outcomes. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
2
Numer
Strony
48--55
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Xiamen University Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
Bibliografia
  • Ahmadi, S., Keshavarzi, A., & Foroutan, M. (2011). The Application of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and its Relationship with Improvement in Teaching and Learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 475-480.
  • Alzaza, N. S., & Yaakub, A. R. (2011). Students' Awareness and Requirements of Mobile Learning Services in the Higher Education Environment. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 3(1), 95-100. doi:10.38441ajebasp.2011.95.100.
  • Ariffin, S.A. (2011). Mobile Learning in the Institution of Higher Learning for Malaysia students: Culture perspective. In Proceeding of the International Conference on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology 2011.
  • Arokiasamy A., Abdullah, A.G.K., & Ismail, A. (2014). Correlation between Cultural Perceptions, Leadership Style and ICT Usage by School Principals in Malaysia. TOJET- Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(3), 27-40.
  • Bloom, B., Englehart, M. Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, Toronto: Longmans, Green.
  • Buckenmayer, J. (2008). Revisiting teacher adoption of technology: Research implications and recommendations for successful full technology integration. College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal, 4(6), 7-10.
  • Cavus, N. & Ibrahim, D. (2009). M-learning: An experience in using SMS to support learning new English language words. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 78-91.
  • Cavus, N., Bicen, H., & Akeil, U. (2008, June). The opinions of information technology students on using mobile learning. Paper presented at the 08 International Conferences on Educational Sciences, Magosa, North Cyprus.
  • Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1054-1064. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.015.
  • Cochrane, T. D. (2010). Exploring mobile learning success factors. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 18(2), 133-148. doi:10.1080/09687769.2010.494718.
  • Cruz Y., Assar, S., & Boughzala, I. (2012). Exploring teacher's perception and potential use of Mobile Learning in a Business School. Paper Presented at the 18th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Washington, United States of America.
  • Echeverría, A., Nussbaum, M., Calderón, J. F., Bravo, C., Infante, C., & Vásquez, A. (2011). Face-to-face collaborative learning supported by mobile phones. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(4), 351-363.
  • Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd Ed.). London: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.
  • Ghavifekr, S., Afshari, M., & Amla Salleh. (2012). Management strategies for E-Learning system as the core component of systemic change: A qualitative analysis. Life Science Journal, 9(3), 2190-2196.
  • Hatlevik, O. E., & Arnseth, H. C. (2012). ICT, teaching and leadership: How do teachers experience the importance of ICT-supportive school leaders. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 7(1), 55-69.
  • Hyman, J. A., Moser, M. T., & Segala, L. N. (2014). Electronic reading and digital library technologies: Understanding learner expectation and usage intent for mobile learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62, 35-52.
  • Iqbal, S. & Qureshi, L. A. (2012). M-learning adoption: A perspective from a developing country. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(3), 147-164.
  • Jones, V., & Jo, J. H. (2004, December). Ubiquitous learning environment: An adaptive teaching system using ubiquitous technology. In Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp. 468- 474).
  • Kafyulilo, A. (2012). Access, use and perceptions of teachers and students towards mobile phones as a tool for teaching and learning in Tanzania. Education and Information Technologies. doi:10.1007/s10639- 012-9207-y.
  • Kim-Soon, N., Rahman, A. & Ahmed, M. (2014). E-Service Quality in Higher Education and Frequency of Use of the Service. International Education Studies, 7(3), 1-10.
  • Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.). The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3-29). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Kozma, R., & Anderson R. E. (2002). Qualitative case studies of innovative pedagogical practices using ICT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 387-394.
  • Lee, H., Lee, W. B., & Kweon, S. C. (2013). Conjoint analysis for mobile devices for ubiquitous learning in higher education: The Korean case. TOJET, 12(1).
  • Lee, Y. H., Hsieh, Y.C., & Hsu, C.N. (2011). Adding Innovation Diffusion Theory to the Technology Acceptance Model: Supporting Employees' Intentions to use E-Learning Systems. Educational Technology & Society, 14(4), 124-137.
  • Lim, T., Abas, Z. W., & Fadzil, M. (2011). Helping Distance Learners Stay Connected: The Effectiveness of Mobile Learning via SMS at Open University Malaysia. In 24th AAOU Annual Conference, Hanoi Open University, Vietnam.
  • Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. (2013). Preliminary Report. Preschool to Post-Secondary Education. Ministry of Education Malaysia.
  • Martin, F., & Ertzberger, J. (2013). Here and now mobile learning: An Experimental study on the use of mobile technology. Computers & Education, 68, 76-85.
  • Menkhoff, T., & Bengtsson, M. L. (2012). Engaging students in higher education through mobile learning: Lessons learnt in a Chinese entrepreneurship course. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 11(3), 225-242.
  • Murphy, A. & Farley, H. (2012). Development of a framework for evaluating the impact and sustainability of mobile learning initiatives in higher education. In M. Brown et al. (Eds.), Future Challenges, Sustainable Futures. Proceedings Ascilite Wellington 2012. (pp. 678-680).
  • Pollara, P., & Kee Broussard, K. (2011). Student Perceptions of Mobile Learning: A Review of Current Research. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (pp. 1643-1650). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  • Puentedura, R. R. (2013, May 29). SAMR: Moving from enhancement to transformation [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/000095.html.
  • Rogers, Y., Connelly, K., Hazlewood, W. & Tedesco, L. (2010). Enhancing learning: A study of how mobile devices can facilitate sense making. Personal & Ubiquitous Computing, 14(2), 111-124.
  • Rosman, P. (2008). M-Learning-As a paradigm of new forms in education. E+M Economies and Management, 1, 119-125.
  • Seet, L. Y. B. & Quek, C. L. (2010). Evaluating students' perceptions and attitudes toward computer mediated project-based learning environment: A case study. Learning Environments Research, 13(2), 173- 185.
  • Serin, O. (2012). Mobile learning perceptions of the prospective teachers (Turkish republic of Northern Cyprus sampling). The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(3), 222-233.
  • Sherry, L., & Gibson, D. (2002). The path to teacher leadership in educational technology. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 2(2), 178-203.
  • Wang, J., Yu, W., & Wu, E. (2013). Empowering mobile assisted social e-learning: Students' expectations and perceptions. World Journal of Education, 3(2). doi:10.5430/wje.v3n2p59.
  • Wang, M., Shen, R., Novak, D., & Pan, X. (2009). The impact of mobile learning on students' learning behaviours and performance: Report from a large blended classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 673-695. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00846.x.
  • Yu, Y. S., Lin, Y. Y., Huang, Y. L., & Hsieh, W. H. (2013). The Evaluation of use the mobile phone learning English in Taiwan. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 3(2), 189-191.
  • Yuen, M. C., Song, H., & Jong, S. J. (2008). Digital habits of Malaysian students and its implication for learning: a preliminary study. In Proceedings of 2nd International Malaysian Educational Technology Convention - IMETC2008.
  • Zulkafly, N. A., Koo, A. C., Shariman, T. P. N., & Zainuddin, M. N. (2011). Educators' perceptions towards Mobile Learning. Paper Presented at the Artificial Intelligence Workshop, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171555241

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.