Can trail characteristics influence visitor numbers in natural protected areas? A quantitative approach to trail choice assessment

• Autorzy: Kamila Svobodov , Luis Monteiro , Jiri Vojar , Katerina Gdulova
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Planning for recreational activities in protected areas involves an understanding of multiple and complex factors. Trails constitute the main recreation facility in protected areas. They are an important and common infrastructure that concentrates visitor movement. Their sustainable planning and management requires an understanding of how the visitors made their selection. The aim of this study was to identify the effect of trail attributes on visitor numbers in the Krkonoše Mountains National Park in the Czech Republic. The methods used in this study present an analytical approach involving geographic information system analysis, field monitoring and data analyses using generalised linear models. The results showed the preferential tendencies among visitors to certain trail attributes. Marginal significance and a rather strong variability in preferences (over 10%) were identified for five trail characteristics: the amount of local attractions; diversity of land cover types; dominant land cover along a trail; soil erosion; and the type of trail surface. In our study, we illustrate an analytical framework for the assessment of trail characteristics that can help guide trail analyses and management efforts. On the other hand, our findings raise new research questions and point to the requirements for further research in order to better understand how environmental attributes influence visitor choice and to use this knowledge for trail planning and management(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Tourism; Tourist routes; Nature protection

PL

Turystyka; Szlaki turystyczne; Ochrona przyrody

• Czasopismo: Environmental & Socio-economic Studies
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 7
• Numer: nr 2
• Strony: 10--20

Twórcy

autor

Kamila Svobodov

• The University of Queensland, St Lucia Campus, Australia

autor

Luis Monteiro

• Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic

autor

Jiri Vojar

• Czech University of Life Sciences Prague,

autor

Katerina Gdulova

• Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

• Arnberger A., Eder R. 2011. The influence of age on recreational trail preferences of urban green-space visitors: A discrete choice experiment with digitally calibrated images. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54: 891-908.
• Ballantyne M., Pickering C.M. 2015. The impacts of trail infrastructure on vegetation and soils: Current literature and future directions. Journal of Environmental Management, 164: 53-64.
• Balmford A., Green J.M.H., Anderson M., Beresford J., Huang C., Naidoo R., Walpole M., Manica A. 2015. Walk on the Wild Side: Estimating the Global Magnitude of Visits to Protected Areas. PLoS Biology, 13, 2: 1-6.
• Barroso F.L., Pinto-Correia T., Ramos I.L., Surová D., Menezes H. 2012. Dealing with fuzziness in user preference studies: Photo based questionnaires in the Mediterranean context. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104: 329-342.
• Becken S., Simmons D.G. 2002. Understanding energy consumption patterns of tourist attractions and activities in New Zealand. Tourism Management, 23, 4: 343-354.
• Braun Kohlová M., Melichar J., Kaprová K. 2017. Methodology for monitoring of visitors to protected areas. Prague, Nature Protection Agency of the Czech Republic.
• Buckley R. 2000. Neat trends: current issues in nature, eco- and adventure tourism. International Journal of Tourism Research, 2: 437-444.
• Buckley R. 2009. Ecotourism: Principles and Practices. CABI, Oxford.
• Bulut Z., Yilmaz H. 2008. Determination of landscape beauties through visual quality assessment method: A case study for Kemaliye (Erzincan/Turkey). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 141: 121-129.
• Cañas I., Ayuga E., Ayuga F. 2009. A contribution to the assessment of scenic quality of landscapes based on preferences expressed by the public. Land Use Policy, 26: 1173-1181.
• Cessford G., Cockburn S., Douglas M. 2002. Developing new visitor counters and their applications for management. Paper presented at the First Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas Conference, Vienna. Available at: http://mmv.boku.ac.at/downloads/mmv1-proceedings.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Cihar M., Stursa J., Trebicky V. 2002. Monitoring of Tourism in the Czech National Parks. [in:] A. Arnberger, C. Brandenburg, A. Muhar (eds.) Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas. Conference Proceedings. Institute for Landscape Architecture and Landscape Management, BOKU - University of Natural Resources and Applied Sciences, Vienna: 240-245.
• Crawley M. J. 2007. The R book. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
• Dallimer M., Katherine N.I., Andrew M.J.S., Zoe G.D., Paul R.A., James R.R., Lorraine L.M., Philip H.W., Kevin J.G. 2012. Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. BioScience, 62, 1: 47-55.
• D'antonio A., Monz, C., Newman P., Lawson S., Taff D. 2013. Enhancing the utility of visitor impact assessment in parks and protected areas: A combined social-ecological approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 124: 72-81.
• Drahný R. 2018. We exactly know it now - Czech part of the Krkonoše Mountains are visited by 11 million visitors per year. Available at: https://www.krnap.cz/aktuality/tzted-uz-to-vime-presne-ceske-krkonose-maji-pres-11-milionu-navstev-rocne (07.12.2018).
• Drábková A., Šišák L. 2013. Forest visitors' opinion of recreational facilities and trails in forests in the Blaník Protected Landscape Area - a case study. Journal of Forest Science, 59: 185-190.
• Farías Torbidoni E. I., Grau H. R., Camps A. 2005. Trail preferences and visitor characteristics in Aigüestortes i Estany de Sant Maurici National Park, Spain. Mountain Research and Development, 25: 51-59.
• Fousek J., Hartmanová O., Štursa J., Potocki J. 2007. Krkonoše: Nature, history, life (in Czech). Prague, Baset.
• Gobster P. H. 1995. Perception and use of metropolitan greenway system for recreation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 33: 401-413.
• Goeft U., Alder J. 2001. Sustainable mountain biking: a case study from the southwest of Western Australia. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 9(3): 193-211.
• Government Of Czechoslovakia 1963. Government Regulation No. 41/1963 Coll., on establishing Krkonoše Mountains National Park. Prague, Ministry of Justice [in Czech].
• Hausner V.H., Engen S., Bludd E.K., Yoccoz N.G. 2017. Policy indicators for use in impact evaluations of protected area networks. Ecological Indicators, 75: 192-202.
• International Union For Conservation Of Nature (Iucn) 1984. Proceedings from the 16th Session of the General Assembly of IUCN and 16th IUCN Technical Meeting. Gland, IUCN.
• Jorgensen A., Hitchmough J., Calvert T. 2002. Woodland spaces and edges: Their impact on perception of safety and preference. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60: 135-150.
• Junge X., Jacot K. A., Bosshard A., Lindemann-Matthies P. 2009. Swiss people's attitudes towards field margins for biodiversity conservation. Journal for Nature Conservation, 17: 150-159.
• Kelley H., Van Rensburg T.M., Jeserich N. 2016. Determinants of demand for recreational walking trails in Ireland. Tourism Management, 52: 173-186.
• Kenter J.O., Hyde T., Christie M., Fazey I. 2011. The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries-Evidence from the Solomon Islands. Global Environmental Change, 21: 505-521.
• Kiester R. A. 1997: Aesthetics of biological diversity. Human Ecology Review, 3: 151-157.
• Knapik K., Migoń P., Szuszkiewicz A., Aleksandrowski P. 2011. Geopark Karkonosze - geopark i geoturystyka. Przegląd Geologiczny, 59, 4: 1065-1108.
• Koemle D.B.A., Morawetz U.B. 2016. Improving mountain bike trails in Austria: An assessment of trail preferences and benefits from trail features using choice experiments. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 15: 55-65.
• Leung Y.-F., Marion J. L. 2000. Recreation impacts and management in wilderness: a state-of-knowledge review. Paper presented at the Wilderness Science in a Time of Change Conference, 5: Wilderness Ecosystems, Threats, and Management, Ogden 23-27.05.1999. Available at: https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_p015_5.pdf (17.05.2017).
• Li W., Ge X., Liu C. 2005. Hiking trails and tourism impact assessment in protected area: Jiuzhaigou Biosphere Reserve, China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 108: 279-293.
• Manning R. E., Lime D. W., Hof M., Freimund W. A. 1995. The Visitor Experience and Resource Protection (VERP) process: The application of carrying capacity to Arches National Park. The George Wright Forum, 12, 3: 41-55.
• Marion J.L., Leung Y.-F. 2004. Environmentally sustainable trail management. [in:] R. Buckley (ed.) Environmental Impacts of Ecotourism. CABI Publishing, Wallingford: 229-243.
• Marion J.L., Wimpey J.F., Park L.O. 2011. The science of trail surveys: Recreation ecology provides new tools for managing wilderness trails. Park Science, 28, 3: 60-65.
• Miller A.B., Leung Y., Kays R. 2017. Coupling visitor and wildlife monitoring in protected areas using camera traps. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 17: 44-53.
• Molnarova K., Sklenicka P., Stiborek J., Svobodova K., Salek M., Brabec E. 2012. Visual preferences for wind turbines: Location, numbers and respondent characteristics. Applied Energy, 92: 269-278.
• Newsome D., Moore S.A., Dowling R.K. (eds.) 2013. Natural area tourism: Ecology impacts and management. Channel View Publications: Clevedon.
• Ólafsdóttir R., Runnström M.C. 2013. Assessing hiking trails condition in two popular tourist destinations in the Icelandic highlands. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 3-4: 57-67.
• Pelletier F. 2006. Effects of tourist activities on ungulate behaviour in a mountain protected area. Journal of Mountain Ecology, 8: 15-19.
• Pescott O.L., Stewart G.B. 2014. Assessing the impact of human trampling on vegetation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental evidence. PeerJ, 2: e360.
• Pigram J.J. 1983. Outdoor recreation and resource management. Croon Helm, London.
• Pigram J.J., Jenkins J.M. 1999. Outdoor recreation management. Routledge, London.
• R Development Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
• Rogowski M. 2016. The potential of Karkonosze Mountains in creating geotourism cluster. [in:] A. Szponar, S. Toczek-Werner (eds.) Geotourism. Organization of the tourism and education in the geoparks in the Middle-Europe Mountains. University of Business in Wrocław, Wrocław: 63-79.
• Rogowski M., Bronowicki S., Machnicka M. 2013. Atrakcyjność turystyczna geostanowisk Geoparku Karkonosze. Studia Periegetica, 2, 10: 109-126.
• Roggenbuck J.W., Williams D.R., Watson A.E. 1993. Defining acceptable conditions in wilderness. Environmental Management, 17: 187-97.
• Swarbrooke J. (eds.) 1995. The development and management of visitor attractions. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
• Šťastná P. 2013. How many tourists are in Krkonoše Mountains? Journal Krkonoše - Jizerské hory, 9, 22-23 [in Czech].
• Svobodova K., Sklenicka P., Molnarova K., Salek M. 2012. Visual preferences for physical attributes of mining and post-mining landscapes with respect to the socio-demographic characteristics of respondents. Ecological Engineering, 43: 34-44.
• Taylor P. 2015. What factors make rail trails successful as tourism attractions? Developing a conceptual framework from relevant literature. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 12: 89-98.
• Tomczyk A.M., Ewertowski M. 2013. Planning of recreational trails in protected areas: Application of regression tree analysis and geographic information systems. Applied Geography, 40: 129-139.
• Ulrich R. S. 1986. Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape Urban Planning, 13: 29-44.
• Walz U. 2011. Landscape structure, landscape metrics and biodiversity. Living Reviews in Landscape Research, 5: 1-35.
• Wimpley J.F., Marion J.L. 2010. The influence of use, environmental and managerial factors on the width of recreational trails. Journal of Environmental Management, 91: 2028-2037.
• Wimpey J.F., Marion J.L. 2011. A Spatial Exploration of Informal Trail Networks Within Great Falls Park, Virginia. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 3: 1012-1022.
• Wolf I.D., Croft D.B. 2014. Impacts of tourism hotspots on vegetation communities show a higher potential for self-propagation along roads than hiking trails. Journal of Environmental Management, 143: 173-185.
• Zahradník, D., Banaš M., Jirásková E. 2012. Back and front of visitor monitoring - Examples of good and less successful visitor monitoring in the Czech protected areas. Journal of Landscape Management, 3: 14-17.
• Zelenka J., Těšitel J., Pásková M., Kušová D. 2013. Sustainable Tourism: Tourism Management in Protected Areas. Hradec Králové, Gaudeamus [in Czech].

Identyfikatory

DOI

https://doi.org/10.2478/environ-2019-0008