Convergence in GDP per Capita across the EU Regions - Spatial Effects

• Autorzy: Maciej Pietrzykowski
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this paper is to offer an empirical insight into the spatial effects of growth of regional income and disparities across EU regions (NUTS 2). Since regions are spatial units and there are interrelated standard linear regression is not sufficient to evidence the convergence process. Two models (Spatial Lag Model - SLM and Spatial Error model - SEM), derived from spatial econometrics, have been used to identify and explain spatial effects in convergence clubs-all EU countries (EU-28), countries that entered the EU in 2004 (EU-13) and countries that were in EU prior to 2004 (EU-15). Unconditional and conditional β-convergence has been examined in the period 2000-2015 thus covering two financial perspectives (including n + 2 rule3). Dummy variables have been also applied to catch the country-specific effects, such as national policies, legislation, technology progress, etc.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Convergence; Economic convergence; Growth model; Economic growth; GDP structure; Gross domestic product (GDP); Cohesion policy

PL

Konwergencja; Konwergencja gospodarcza; Modele wzrostu; Wzrost gospodarczy; Struktura PKB; Produkt krajowy brutto (PKB); Polityka spójności

• Czasopismo: Economics and Business Review
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 5 (19)
• Numer: nr 2
• Strony: 64--85

Twórcy

autor

Maciej Pietrzykowski

• Poznań University of Economics and Business

Bibliografia

• Anselin, L. (2003). Spatial econometrics. In B. H. Baltagi (Ed.), A companion to theoretical econometrics (pp. 310-330). Blackwell: Wiley.
• Anselin, L., Le Gallo, J., & Jayet, H. (2008). Spatial panel econometrics. In: L. Matyas & P. Sevestre (Eds.), The econometrics of panel data (pp. 625-654). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
• Baldwin, R. E., & Forslid, R. (2000). The core-periphery model and endogenous growth: Stabilizing and destabilizing integration. Economica, 67(267), 307-324.
• Barro, R. (2000). Inequality and growth in a panel of countries. Journal of Economic Growth, 5, 5-32.
• Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 223-251.
• Barro, R.,J., Sala-i-Martin, X. (2003). Economic growth (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw- Hill.
• Baumol, W. J. (1986). Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: What the longrun data show. The American Economic Review, 76(5), 1072-1085.
• Broll, U., Kemnitz, A., & Mukherjee, V. (2019). Globalization, inequality and economic policy. Economics and Business Review, 5(1), 3-11. doi:10.18559/ebr.2019.1.1.
• Esposti, R., & Bussoletti, S. (2008). Impact of objective 1 funds on regional growth convergence in the European Union: A panel-data approach. Regional Studies, 42(2), 159-173.
• Eurofound. (2018). Monitoring convergence in the European Union. Upward convergence in the EU: Concepts, measurements and indicators. (Research Report). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
• European Commission. (2015). The five presidents' report: Completing Europe's economic and monetary union. Brussels.
• European Commission. (2017). My region, my Europe, our future. (Seventh report on economic, social and territorial cohesion). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
• Fingleton, B., & Lopez-Bazo, E. (2006). Empirical growth models with spatial effects. (Papers in Regional Science). Regional Science Association International.
• Gorzelak, G., Hryniewicz, J., Kozak, M., Płoszaj, A., Rok, J., & Smętkowski, M. (2017). Data review and mapping of cohesion policy implementation and performance (report). (Cohesity Research Paper No. 7). Warsaw: Centre for Euroepan Regional and Local Studies (EUROREG), University of Warsaw.
• Guevara, C. (2016). Growth agglomeration effects in spatially interdependent Latin American regions. (Working Paper GATE 2016-11).
• Henderson, J. V. (2003). The urbanization process and economic growth: The so-what question. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 47-71.
• Hohenberg, P., & Lees, L. H. (1985). The making of urban Europe (1000-1950). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Kisiała, W., Kudłak, R., Gadziński, J., Dyba, W., Kołsut, B., & Stryjakiewicz, T. (2017). An attempt to model the demand for new cars in Poland and its spatial differences. Economics and Business Review, 3(4), 111-127. doi:10.18559/ebr.2017.4.7.
• Kisiała, W. (2016). Modele regresji przestrzennej w badaniach czynników korzystania ze świadczeń ratownictwa medycznego. In: W. Budner (red.), Gospodarka przestrzenna. Udział poznańskiego Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w kształtowaniu współczesnego paradygmatu (t. 2, s. 239-263). Poznań: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
• Krugman, P., (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483-499.
• Kuc, M. (2017). Social convergence in Nordic countries at regional level. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 12(1), 25-41.
• Kusideł, E. (2013). Konwergencja gospodarcza w Polsce i jej znaczenie w osiąganiu celów polityki spójności. Łodź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
• Lopez-Bazo, E., Vaya, E., Mora, A. J., & Surinach, J. (1999). Regional economic dynamics and convergence in the European Union. The Annals of Regional Science, 33, 343-370.
• Martin, P., & Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2001). Growth and agglomeration. International Economic Review, 42(4), 947-968.
• Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407-437.
• Monfort, Ph. (2009). Regional convergence. Growth and interpersonal inequalities across the EU. (Working Paper, Directorate General Regional Policy, European Commission).
• Nguyen Ha Minh, Nguyen Le Dang. (2018). The relationship between urbanization and economic growth: An empirical study on ASEAN countries. International Journal of Social Economics, 45(2), 316-339. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE- 12-2016-0358.
• Olejnik, A., (2014). An empirical study of productivity growth in EU-28-spatial panel analysis. Comparative Economic Research, 17(4), 187-202. doi:10.2478/cer- 2014-0040.
• Paas, T., & Schlitte, F. (2009). Spatial effects of regional income disparities and growth in the EU countries and regions. Retrieved December 7, 2018 from http:// ec.europa.eu/ eurostat/documents/1001617/ 4398377/S3P2-SPATIAL-EFFECTSTIIU- PAASFRISO-SCHLITTE.pdf.
• Prasad, B. C., Singh, R., & Swami, N. S. (2014). Urbanization and economic growth: An empirical study of Pacific Island economies. (School of Economics Working Paper No. 1). Suva: The University of the South Pacific.
• Rey, S., & Montouri, B. (1999). U.S. regional income convergence: A spatial econometric perspective. Regional Studies, 33, 143-156.
• Sala-i-Martin, X. (1996a). Regional cohesion: Evidence and theories of regional growth and convergence. European Economic Review, 40, 1325-1352.
• Sala-i-Martin, X. (1996b). The classical approach to convergence analysis. Economic Journal, 106, 1019-1036.
• Sala-i-Martin, X. (2002). Fifteen years of new growth economics: What have we learned?. Journal Economia Chilena, 5(2), 5-15.
• Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), s. 65-94.
• Swan, T. W. (1956, November). Economic growth and capital accumulation. Economic Record, 32, 334-361.
• Smętkowski, M., & Wojcik, P. (2008). Regiony w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej: tendencje i czynniki rozwojowe. Warsaw: Centre for European Regional and Local Studies, Warsaw University.
• Suchecki, B., (2010). Modele regresji przestrzennej. In B. Suchecki (red.), Ekonometria przestrzenna. Metody i modele analizy danych przestrzennych (s. 237-266). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck.
• Tobler, W. R. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, 234-240.
• Williamson, J. G. (1988). Migration and urbanization. In H. Chenery & T. N. Srinivasan (Eds.), Handbook of development economics (vol. 1). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.18559/ebr.2019.2.4