PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2019 | 5 (19) | nr 2 | 86--108
Tytuł artykułu

'Dark Matter' in the External Sector of the United States

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The aim of this paper is to examine the 'dark matter' assets in the external sector of the United States in the period 1999:Q1-2018:Q3. The paper investigates data on the balance of payments and international investment position for the US and a group of 18 economies. The research reveals that the US is a privileged economy with respect to foreign income on international investments. The rates of return on its foreign assets are relatively higher, and the costs incurred on its foreign liabilities relatively lower, as compared with the benchmark group. This special privilege of the US relates to equity investments, especially foreign direct investments. Based on prevailing income differentials substantial 'dark matter' assets of the US are estimated. Recognising such 'dark matter' leads to the conclusion that the US is a foreign creditor, not debtor. The findings shed light on the puzzle as to why the US has a continuing ability to sustain its external position despite mounting foreign liabilities.(original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
Numer
Strony
86--108
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Poznań University of Economics and Business
Bibliografia
  • Ahearne, A., Cline, W. R., Lee, K. T., Park, Y. C., Pisani-Ferry, J., & Williamson, J. (2007). Global imbalances: Time for action. Policy Brief No. PB 07-4: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  • Ali, M. (2016). Dark matter, black holes and old-fashioned exploitation: Transnational corporations and the US economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40(4), 997-1018.
  • Altman, E. I., & Kuehne, B. J. (2016). Credit markets and bubbles: Is the benign credit cycle over?. Economics and Business Review, 2(3), 20-31.
  • Ayres, J. (2018). Firm knowledge and international business cycles. Discussion Paper No. IDB-DP-584: Inter-American Development Fund.
  • Bosworth, B., Collins, S. M., & Chodorow-Reich, G. (2007). Returns on FDI: Does the US really do better? (Working Paper No. 13313: National Bureau of Economic Research).
  • Cline, W. R. (2005). The United States as a debtor nation. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  • Curcuru, S. E., & Thomas, C. P. (2015). The return on US direct investment at home and abroad. In C. R. Hulten & M. B. Reinsdorf (Eds.), Measuring wealth and financial intermediation and their links to the real economy (pp. 205-230). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Curcuru, S. E., Thomas, C. P., & Warnock, F. E. (2013). On returns differentials. Journal of International Money and Finance, 36, 1-25.
  • Dooley, M. P., Folkerts-Landau, D., & Garber, P. (2003). An essay on the revived Bretton Woods system. (Working Paper No. 9971: National Bureau of Economic Research).
  • Dooley, M. P., Folkerts-Landau, D., & Garber, P. (2004). The revived Bretton Woods system. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 9, 307-313.
  • Dooley, M. P., Folkerts-Landau, D., & Garber, P. (2009). Bretton Woods II still defines the international monetary system. (Working Paper No. 14731: National Bureau of Economic Research).
  • Doornik, J. A., & Hansen, H. (2008). An omnibus test for univariate and multivariate normality. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70, 927-939.
  • EC. (2015, June 17). Action plan for fair and efficient corporate taxation: Speaking points of Commissioner Pierre Moscovici. European Commission, Brussels.
  • EC. (2018). Evolution of the EU list of tax havens. European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/files/eu,_list_update_25_ May_2018_en.pdf.
  • Economist, The. (2006, January 19). America's dark materials. Retrieved October 28, 2018 from https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2006/01/19/americas- dark-materials.
  • Edwards, S. (2005). The end of large current account deficits, 1970-2002: Are there lessons for the United States? (Working Paper No. 11669: National Bureau of Economic Research).
  • Gourinchas, P.-O., & Rey, H. (2007). From world banker to world venture capitalist: US external adjustment and the exorbitant privilege. In R. H. Clarida (Ed.), G7 Current account imbalances: Sustainability and adjustment (pp. 11-66). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Gros, D. (2006a). Foreign investment in the US (II): Being taken to the cleaners?. (Research Notes No. 13: Deutsches Institut fur Wirtschaftsforschung).
  • Gros, D. (2006b). Why the US current account deficit is not sustainable. International Finance, 9(2), 241-260.
  • Hausmann, R., & Sturzenegger, F. (2006). Why the US current account deficit is sustainable. International Finance, 9(2), 223-240.
  • Hausmann, R., & Sturzenegger, F. (2007). The valuation of hidden assets in foreign transactions: Why 'dark matter' matters. Business Economics, 42(1), 28-34.
  • Heath, A. (2007). What explains the US net income balance? (Working Paper No. 223: Bank for International Settlements).
  • Higgins, M., Klitgaard, T., & Tille, C. (2005). The income implications of rising US international liabilities. Current Issues in Economics and Finance, 11(12), 1-9.
  • Hill, T., & Lewicki, P. (2006). Statistics: methods and applications: A comprehensive reference for science, industry, and data mining. Tulsa: StatSoft.
  • IMF. (2009). Balance of payments and international investment position manual (BPM6, 6th ed.). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
  • Ito, H., & McCauley, R. N. (2018). A key currency view of global imbalances. (Working Paper). Retrieved from https://ies.keio.ac.jp/upload/20180710_macro_ito_wp-Itoand- McCauley-paper-on-currency-zones-hi-180706.pdf.
  • Jarque, C. M., & Bera, A. K. (1980). Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals. Economics Letters, 6(3), 255-259.
  • Kitchen, J. (2007). Sharecroppers or shrewd capitalists? Projections of the US current account, international income flows, and net international debt. Review of International Economics, 15(5), 1036-1061.
  • Kristinsson, T. O. (2016). Net errors and omissions in balance of payments statistics. Impacts, casuses and effects. Thesis. Retrieved from https://run.unl.pt/bitstream/ 10362/19594/1/TEGI0370.pdf.
  • Lilliefors, H. W. (1967). On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62(318), 399-402.
  • Lilliefors, H. W. (1969). On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for the exponential distribution with mean unknown. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64(325), 387-389.
  • McGrattan, E. R., & Prescott, E. C. (2010). Technology capital and the US current account. American Economic Review, 100(4), 1493-1522.
  • Obstfeld, M., & Rogoff, K. (2000). Perspectives on OECD economic integration: Implications for US current account adjustment. (Paper presented at the conference 'Global Economic Integration: Opportunities and Challenges', Jackson Hole).
  • Obstfeld, M., & Rogoff, K. (2004). The unsustainable US current account revisited. (Working Paper No. 10869: National Bureau of Economic Research).
  • Obstfeld, M., & Rogoff, K. (2005). Global current account imbalances and exchange rate adjustments. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, (1), 67-146.
  • Pera, J. (2016). The risk of the increasing divergence of the eurozone and the problem of macroeconomic imbalances in a three-gap model. Economics and Business Review, 2(2), 18-38.
  • Roubini, N. (2006). The BW 2 regime: An unstable disequilibrium bound to unravel. International Economics and Economic Policy, 3(3-4), 303-332.
  • Roubini, N., & Setser, B. (2005). Will the Bretton Woods 2 regime unravel soon? The risk of a hard landing in 2005-2006. (Paper presented at the symposium 'The Revived Bretton Woods System: A New Paradigm for Asian Development?', San Francisco).
  • Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3/4), 591-611.
  • Sobanski, K. (2010). Zjawisko globalnej nierównowagi a stabilność rozwoju gospodarki światowej - ujęcie retrospektywne i prospektywne. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Oeconomica, 238, 217-229.
  • Sobanski, K. (2015). Valuation effect as a determinant of the international investment position in Central and Eastern European economies. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 10(3), 151-164.
  • Wolf, M. (2004, August 17). America on the comfortable path to ruin. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/488f2e14-f07a-11d8-a553- 00000e2511c8.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171558682

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.