Endogenous Potential of Rural Areas vs. the Structure And Allocation of Funds Under the 2007-2013 RDP

• Autorzy: Mirosław Biczkowski
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The main purpose of this paper is to assess the geographical diversification of and trends in the implementation of funds under the 2007-2013 RDP in relation to the endogenous potential of individual local government units. The amount of resources dedicated to implementing the program turned it into an instrument with a strong impact on rural development. Moreover, the program added considerable momentum to rural activities (provided that the population wanted to access European funds). The analysis of RDP funds allocation clearly demonstrated that the focal point was on the environment- and agriculture-related measures. However, there was not enough intervention which would drive the development of other functions and improvements in living standards for the villages. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Rural areas; Endogenous variable; Rural Development Programme; EU funds

PL

Obszary wiejskie; Zmienna objaśniana; Program Rozwoju Obszarów Wiejskich; Fundusze unijne

• Czasopismo: Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development
• Rocznik: 2019
• Numer: z. 1 (51)
• Strony: 5--14

Twórcy

autor

Mirosław Biczkowski

• Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland

Bibliografia

• Adamski, T., Dzwonkowska, K., Gorlach, K., Pilachowski, A., Starosta, P. (2007). Wiedza w rozwoju zrównoważonym wsi. [Knowledge in the sustainable development of the village]. Kraków: UJ [in Polish].
• Biczkowski, M. (2013). Przestrzenna alokacja wsparcia finansowego z instrumentów WPR i ich wpływ na rozwój społeczno-gospodarczy obszarów wiejskich. [The spatial allocation of financial support from the instruments of the Common Agricultural Policy and its impact on socio-economic development of rural areas]. Acta Univ. Lodz. Folia Geog. Soc.-Oecon., 13, 93-14 [in Polish].
• Biczkowski, M. (2016). Fundusze unijne wdrażane poprzez Regionalne Programy Operacyjne jako neoendogeniczny czynnik rozwoju obszarów wiejskich. [EU funds implemented by the Regional Operational Programmes as neoendogenous factor development of rural areas]. Stud. Obsz. Wiej., 41, 63-81 [in Polish].
• Carnicky, S., Megyesiova, S. (2017). Productivity development and corvergence across the EU Member states. Econ. Ann. XXI, 162(11-12), 13-17.
• Dwyer, J., Ward, N., Lowe, P., Baldock, D. (2007). European Rural Development under the Common Agricultural Policys 'Second Pillar': Institutional Conservatism and Innovation. Reg. Stud., 41(7), 873-888. doi:10.1080/00343400601142795.
• Heffner, K. (2007). Rozwój społeczno-gospodarczy obszarów wiejskich. [Socio-economic development of rural areas]. In: A. Rosner (Ed.), Zróżnicowanie poziomu rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego obszarów wiejskich a zróżnicowanie dynamiki przemian [Diversification of the level of socio-economic development of rural areas and diversification of the dynamics of change] (pp.11-26). Warszawa: Instytut Rozwoju Wsi i Rolnictwa PAN [in Polish].
• Jankova, L., Jurgelane, I., Auzina, A. (2016). European Union cohesion policy. Economic science for rural development: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference (pp. 79-86).
• Klekotko, M. (2005). Wiejskie społeczeństwo obywatelskie czy wiejskie społeczności obywatelskie? O problemach badania obywatelskości ludności wiejskiej. [Rural civil socjety or rural civic communities? On the problems of studying the citizenship of the rural population]. In: K. Gorlach, G. Foryś (Eds.), W obliczu zmiany: wybrane strategie działania mieszkańców polskiej wsi [In the face of change: selected strategies of action of the inhabitants of the Polish countryside] (pp. 107-117). Kraków: UJ [in Polish].
• Marchlewski, W. (2006). Analizy w zakresie przeglądu koncepcji oraz stanu wiedzy w Polsce na temat metropolizacji. [Analyzes in the scope of concept review and state of knowledge in Poland on the subject of metropolisation].
• Retrieved Ferbruary 11th 2018 from: http://funduszestrukturalne. gov.pl [in Polish].
• North, D., Smallbone, D. (2006). Developing entrepreneurship and enterprise in Europe's peripheral rural areas: Some issues facing policy-makers. Eur. Plan. Stud., 14(1), 41-60. doi:10.1080/09654310500339125
• Pondel, H. (2017). European Union funds as a tool for creating new functions of rural areas, as illustrated by the example of RDP. J. Agribus. Rural Dev., 2(44), 435-443. doi:10.17306/J.JARD.2017.00307
• Racine, J. B., Raymond, H. (1977). Quantitative analysis in geography. Warszawa: PWN.
• Ray, C. (1997). Towards a theory of the dialectic of rural development. Soc. Rural., 27(3), 345-362.
• Ray, C. (2006). Neo-endogenous rural development in the EU. In: P. Cloke, T. Marsden, P. Mooney (Eds.), Handbook of Rural Studies (pp. 278-291). London: Sage. Rogalska, E., Pietrzak, M., Balcerzak, A. (2016). European funds for sustainable growth policy support conveeregence process? The 10th International Days of Statistics and Economics: conference proceedings (pp. 1323-1331).
• Rosner, A. (1999). Wiejskie obszary problemowe pod kątem widzenia rozwoju gospodarczego. [Rural problem areas in terms of view economic development]. In: A. Rosner (Ed.), Typologia wiejskich obszarów problemowych [Typology of rural problem areas] (pp. 30-44), Warszawa: IRWiR PAN [in Polish].
• Špetlík, V. (2017). Economic impact of the European Union and its perception by society in the Czech Republic. The 11th International Days of Statistics and Economics: conference proceedings (1644-1652).
• Zegar, J. S. (2015). Polish Agriculture During the Two Breakthroughs - Political Transformation and European Integration. Soc. Inequal. Econ. Growth, 41(1), 148-160.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17306/J.JARD.2019.01112