Adaptive Development of a Regional Spatial Data Infrastructure Facing Local Prospects and Socio-Technological Trends

• Autorzy: Risto Kalliola , Niina Käyhkö , Sanna Jokela
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The regional Lounaispaikka-SDI (Spatial Data Infrastructure) in south-west Finland is being developed by a dynamic assembly of the region's geospatial expertise and its networking, spatial data and geoportal services. Emerging as a data-centric constellation that supported the region's geographical information professionals, this assembly has developed into a geospatial service with more broadly-focused public information on the region. This development has had five adaptive phases, each as a response to changing local needs and fast-evolving trends in information and communication technologies. Alongside these processes, the Lounaispaikka-SDI has also reinforced the region's geospatial competencies with benefits offered to academia, public sector institutions, and companies. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Spatial analysis; Regional development; Services

PL

Analiza przestrzenna; Rozwój regionalny; Usługi

• Czasopismo: Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series
• Rocznik: 2019
• Numer: No. 44
• Strony: 73--80

Twórcy

autor

Risto Kalliola

• University of Turku, Finland

autor

Niina Käyhkö

• University of Turku, Finland

autor

Sanna Jokela

• University of Turku, Finland

Bibliografia

• Budhatoki, N. R., Bruce, B. and Nedović-Budić, Z., 2008: Reconceptualizing the role of the user of spatial data infrastructure. In: Geojournal, Volume 72, pp. 149-160.
• Burnett, C. and Kalliola, R., 2000: Maps in the information society. In: Fennia, Volume 178, pp. 81-96.
• Craglia M. and Campagna, M. 2010: Advanced Regional SDI in Europe: Comparative cost-benefit evaluation and impact assessment perspective. In: International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, Volume 5, pp. 145-167.
• Crompvoets J., Bregt, A., Rajabifard, A., and Williamson, I., 2004: Assessing the worldwide developments of national spatial data clearinghouses. In: International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Volume 18, Issue 7, pp. 665-689.
• de Man E. W. H., 2006: Understanding SDI; complexity and institutionalization. International In: Journal of Geographical Information Science, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp. 329-343.
• Elwood, S., 2008: Grassroots groups as stakeholders in spatial data infrastructures: challenges and opportunities for local data development and sharing. In: International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp. 71-90.
• Grus, L., Crompvoets, J., and Bregt, A. K., 2010: Spatial data infrastructures as complex adaptive systems. In: International Journal of Geographical Information Science Volume 24, Issue 3, pp. 439-463.
• Hendriks, P. H. J., Dessers, E., and van Hootegam, G., 2012: Reconsidering the definition of spatial data infrastructure. In: International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Volume 26, Issue 8, pp. 1479-1494.
• INSPIRE, 2007: Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community. In: Official Journal of the European Union, L 108/1 50.
• Masó, J., Pons, X., and Zabala, A., 2012: Tuning the second generation SDI: theoretical aspects and real use cases. In: International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp. 983-1014.
• Masser I., 1999: All shapes and sizes: the first generation of national spatial data infrastructures. In: International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Volume 131, pp. 67-84.
• Masser, I., Rajabifard, a., and Williamson, I., 2008: Spatially enabling governments through SDI implementation. In: International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp. 5-20.
• Oskari, 2017: Oskari. DOI: http://www.oskari.org/ 2017.10.26.
• Perkman M., and Schildt, H., 2015: Open data partnerships between firms and universities: The role of boundary organisations. In: Research Policy, Volume 44, Issue 5, pp. 1133-1143.
• Rajabifard A., Binns, A., Masser, I., and Williamson, I., 2006: The role of sub-national government and the private sector in future spatial data infrastructures. In: International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Volume 20, Issue 7, pp. 727-741.
• Riihelä, J., and Mäki, S., 2015: Designing and Implementing an Online GIS Tool for Schools: The Finnish Case of the PaikkaOppi Project. In: Journal of Geography, Volume 114, Issue 1, pp. 15-25.
• Sadeghi-Niaraki, A., Rajabifard, A., Kim, K., and Seo, J., 2010: Ontology Based SDI to Facilitate Spatially Enabled Society. Proceedings of GSDI 12 World Conference, pp. 19-22.
• Strain, L., Rajabifard, A., and Williamson, I., 2006: Marine administration and spatial data infrastructure. In: Marine Policy, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp. 431-441.
• Toivonen, T. and Kalliola, R., 2007: Data lending service. A novel solution of the Finnish NSDI. In: Geoinformatics, Volume 10, Issue 7, 24-25.
• Tolvanen, H. and Kalliola, R., 2008: A structured approach to geographical information in coastal research and management. In: Ocean & Coastal Management, Volume 51, Issue 6, pp. 485-494.
• Vandenbroucke, D., Crompvoets, J., Vancauwenberghe, G., Dessers, E., and Van Orshoven, J., 2009: A Network Perspective on Spatial Data Infrastructures: Application to the Sub-national SDI of Flanders (Belgium). In: Transactions in GIS, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp. 105-122.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/bog-2019-0016