PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2019 | 17 | nr 2 (82) Organizational Management Issues in the Age of Industry 4.0 | 127--141
Tytuł artykułu

Organizational Routines, Practices and Artefacts : at the Intersection between the Evolutionary and the Cultural Approach

Warianty tytułu
Rutyny organizacyjne, praktyki i artefakty : na styku podejścia ewolucyjnego i kulturowego
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
Celem badań jest poszukiwanie odpowiedzi na pytanie, czy wewnętrzne czynniki kulturowe, zwłaszcza artefakty i praktyki organizacyjne, mają wpływ na naturę rutyn organizacyjnych. Celem poznawczym jest wskazanie podejścia ewolucyjnego i nurtu kulturowego w zarządzaniu jako uzupełniających się w zakresie wiedzy o ewolucyjnych mechanizmach zmian. Przyjęto tutaj wewnątrzorganizacyjną perspektywę rozważań i intraorganizacyjny poziom analizy. Artykuł ma charakter teoriotwórczy. Dokonano szerokiego przeglądu referencyjnej literatury w obszarze rutyn organizacyjnych i kulturowych artefaktów i praktyk. Wnioski wskazują, że widoczne elementy kultury, artefakty i praktyki, są w rzeczywistości indeterministycznymi, dynamicznymi konstruktami i mają duże znaczenie dla wyjaśniania dynamiki rutyn organizacyjnych w podejściu ewolucyjnym. W podsumowaniu wskazano kierunki przyszłych badań w tym obszarze. (abstrakt oryginalny)
EN
The aim of the paper is establish whether cultural intra-factors, especially artefacts and organizational practices, have any effects on organizational routines. The cognitive goal is to present the evolutionary approach and the cultural field in management as complementary in the understanding of the evolutionary mechanisms of change. The paper presents a conceptual approach, based on the intra-organizational perspective and intra-organizational level of analysis. The study provides an integrated overview of the latest literature related to organizational routines and organizational culture. The contribution lies in considering cultural factors as dynamic, indeterministic and evolutionary constructs that are strongly connected to the organizational routine in the evolutionary approach. The concluding section presents areas and directions for future research. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
17
Strony
127--141
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Wrocław University of Economics, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. Abatecola, G. (2014). Research in organizational evolution. What comes next? European Management Journal, 32(3), 434-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.07.008.
  • 2. Abatecola, G., Belussi, F., Breslin, D., & Filatotchev, I. (2016). Darwinism, organizational evolution and survival: key challenges for future research. Journal of Management and Governance, 20(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-015-9310-8.
  • 3. Andrijevskaja, J., & Vadi, M. (2006). Measuring organizational culture in Germany. National and international aspects of organizational culture, 24(10), 224-247.
  • 4. Baumüller, M. (2007). Managing Cultural Diversity: An Empirical Examination of Cultural Networks and Organizational Structures as Governance Mechanisms in Multinational Corporations. Peter Lang.
  • 5. Becker, M.C. (2004). Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(4), 643-677. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth026.
  • 6. Becker, M.C., Lazaric, N., Nelson, R.R., & Winter, S.G. (2005). Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change. Industrial and corporate change, 14(5), 775-791. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth071.
  • 7. Bertels, S., Howard-Grenville, J., & Pek, S. (2016). Cultural molding, shielding, and shoring at Oilco: The role of culture in the integration of routines. OrganizationScience, 27(3), 573-593. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1052.
  • 8. Biesenthal, C., Gudergan, S., & Ambrosini, V. (2018). The role of ostensive and performative routine aspects in dynamic capability deployment at different organizational levels. Long Range Planning.
  • 9. Carayannis, E.G., Grigoroudis, E., Del Giudice, M., Della Peruta, M.R., & Sindakis, S. (2017). An exploration of contemporary organizational artefacts and routines ina sustainable excellence context. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(1), 35-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2015-0366.
  • 10. Cohen, M.D., Burkhart, R., Dosi G., Egidi M., Marengo L., Warglien M., & Winter, S.G. (1996). Routines and Other Recurring Patterns of Organisations: ContemporaryResearch Issues. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(3), 653-698. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/5.3.653.
  • 11. Cyert, R.M., & March, J.G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (pp. 169-187). NY, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
  • 12. D'Adderio, L. (2008). The Performativity of Routines: Theorising the Influence of Artefacts and Distributed Agencies on Routines Dynamics. Research Policy, 37(5), 769-789. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1309622.
  • 13. D'Adderio, L. (2011). Artefacts at the centre of routines: Performing the material turn in routines theory. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(2), 197-230. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413741000024X.
  • 14. Ehlers, U.D., Helmstedt, C., & Richter, T. (2010). Analysing New E-Learning Culture. Conference paper presented at European Distance and E-learning Network (EDEN), Valencia, 2010. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net (12.2018).
  • 15. Feldman, M.S., & Pentland, B.T. (2008). Issues in empirical field studies of organizational routines. In: M.C. Becker (ed.), Handbook of Organizational Routines (pp. 281-300). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
  • 16. Feldman, M.S., & Pentland B.T. (2003). Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94-118. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556620.
  • 17. Fracchia, J., & Lewontin, R.C. (1999). Does culture evolve? History and Theory, 38(4), 52-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/0018-2656.00104.
  • 18. Gagliardi P. (1990). Artefacts as pathways and remains of organizational life. In: P. Gagliardi (ed.), Symbols and Artefacts: Views of the Corporate Landscape. Berlin:Walter de Gruyter.
  • 19. Glaser, V.L. (2017). Design performances: How organizations inscribe artefacts to change routines. Academy of Management Journal, 60(6), 2126-2154. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0842.
  • 20. Hodgson, G.M., & Knudsen, T. (2004). The firm as an interactor: Firms as vehicles for habits and routines. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(3), 281-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0192-1.
  • 21. Hofstede, G. (1992). Culture and Organisations: Software of the Mind. McGraw Hill, Maidenhead.
  • 22. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. 3rd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • 23. Johnson, G. & Scholes, K. (1999). Exploring Corporate Strategy. 5th ed., London, New York: Prentice Hall Europe.
  • 24. Kline, M.A., Waring, T.M., & Salerno, J. (2018). Designing cultural multilevel selection research for sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 13(1), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0509-2.
  • 25. Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of management journal, 45(1), 215-233. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069293.
  • 26. Lundberg, C.C. (1990). Surfacing Organisational Culture. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 5(4), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683949010001520.
  • 27. Margolis, S. (2018). Organizational practices. Retrieved from: https://sheilamargolis.com/core-culture-and-five-ps/the-five-ps-and-organizational-alignment/practices/ (12.2018).
  • 28. Minkov, M., & Hofstede, G. (2011). The evolution of Hofstede's doctrine. Cross Cultural Management. An International Journal, 18(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/0.1108/13527601111104269.
  • 29. Nelson, R.R., & Winter S.G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. London: Harvard University Press/Cambridge: Belknap Press.
  • 30. Parmigiani, A., & Howard-Grenville, J. (2011). Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 413-453. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.589143.
  • 31. Pentland, B.T., & Feldman M.S. (2005). Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), 793-815. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth070.
  • 32. Pentland, B.T., & Feldman, M.S. (2008). Designing routines: On the folly of designing artefacts, while hoping for patterns of action. Information and Organization, 18(4), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2008.08.001.
  • 33. Pentland, B.T., Feldman, M.S., Becker, M.C., & Liu, P. (2012). Dynamics of organizational routines: A generative model. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1484-1508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01064.x.
  • 34. Runciman, W.G. (2005). Culture does evolve. History and Theory, 44(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/0.1111/j.1468-2303.2005.00304.x.
  • 35. Schein, E.H. (1985). Organisational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  • 36. Stańczyk, S. (2017). Organizational Routines. Levels. Types. Aspects. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference of Business Economics, Management and Marketing ISCOBEMM, Zaječí, Czech Republic, pp. 264-272.
  • 37. Stańczyk-Hugiet, E., Piórkowska, K., & Stańczyk, S. (2017). Organizational Routines and Context Alteration: A Reconciliation. Argumenta Oeconomica, 2(39), 341-371. https://doi.org/10.15611/aoe.2017.2.14.
  • 38. Stańczyk-Hugiet, E., Piórkowska, K., Stańczyk, S. & Strużyna, J. (2019). Evolutionary Selection Processes. Towards Intra-Organizational Facets. Emerald Publishing.
  • 39. Turner S.F., & Rindova V. (2012). A balancing act: How organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organization Science, 23(1), 24-46. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0653.
  • 40. Turner, B.A. (1988). Connoisseurship in the study of organizational cultures. In: A. Bryman (ed.), Doing Research in Organizations (pp. 108-122). London: Routledge.
  • 41. Uli, V. (2018). A co-evolutionary perspective on business processes. Business Process Management Journal, 24(3), 652-670. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-01-2016-0008.
  • 42. Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field. On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 43. Whittington, R. (2006). Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27(5), 613-634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606064101.
  • 44. Wilson, M.D. (2007). Managing Organisational Culture, Managing Change: Towards an Integrated Framework of Analysis. A Research Seminar at the University of Bath 'Developing theory in organisational research and practice in educational settings', 13th and 14th June 2007.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171559259

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.