PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2019 | 17 | nr 2 (82) Organizational Management Issues in the Age of Industry 4.0 | 186--204
Tytuł artykułu

Organizational Resilience of Family Businesses

Warianty tytułu
Odporność organizacyjna przedsiębiorstw rodzinnych
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Organizational resilience is a complex, strategic question that still lacks a clear answer, in particular relating to whether and how it is beneficial for the competitive advantage of a family business. We define organizational resilience of a family business as a dynamic, ambidextrous capability to recover from and positively adjust to an unexpected, adverse situation. In this study, using the strategic management theoretical background, we link organizational resilience to the competitive advantage of family businesses. We test this conjecture using data from 193 Polish small and medium-sized manufacturing family businesses. Drawing on these findings, we conceptualize organizational resilience along two dimensions: community robustness and creative agility identified as a key duality of organizational resilience in the context of family businesses. Results demonstrate that ambidextrous organizational resilience is positively correlated with the competitive advantage of a family business. We discuss the contribution of the theory of ambidexterity and dynamic capabilities to the understanding of organizational resilience, as well as the implications of the latter for the creation of competitive advantage by a family. (original abstract)
Odporność organizacyjna jest złożonym, strategicznym zjawiskiem. W szczególności, istotną kwestią jest odpowiedź na pytania, czy i w jaki sposób wpływa ona na przewagę konkurencyjną. Na potrzeby artykułu odporność organizacyjną zdefiniowano jako dynamiczną, obustronną zdolność przedsiębiorstwa do dostosowywania się do nieprzewidzianych przeciwności i regenerowania się po nich. W badaniach, wykorzystując teorię zarządzania strategicznego, założono, że odporność organizacyjna jest powiązana z przewagą konkurencyjną przedsiębiorstwa rodzinnego. Hipoteza ta została poddana badaniu na danych z 193 małych i średnich polskich przedsiębiorstw rodzinnych. W oparciu o analizę literatury skonceptualizowano odporność organizacyjną jako dynamiczną zdolność do godzenia sprzeczności pomiędzy odpornością społeczną i twórczą zwinnością. Wyniki wskazują, że obustronna odporność organizacyjna jest pozytywnie powiązana z przewagą konkurencyjną przedsiębiorstwa rodzinnego. W artykule przedyskutowano wkład teorii obustronności i dynamicznych zdolności do pojmowania odporności organizacyjnej oraz wpływ tak rozumianej odporności na osiąganie przewagi konkurencyjnej w przedsiębiorstwach rodzinnych. (abstrakt oryginalny)
Rocznik
Tom
17
Strony
186--204
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • University of Economics in Katowice, Poland
  • University of Economics in Katowice, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. Acquaah, M., Amoako-Gyampah, K., & Jayaram, J. (2011). Resilience in family and nonfamily firms: An examination of the relationships between manufacturing strategy, competitive strategy and firm performance. International Journal of Production Research, 49.
  • 2. Aleksic, A., Stefanovic, M., Arsovski, A., & Tadic, D. (2013). An assessment of organizational resilience potential in SMEs of the process industry, a fuzzy approach. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process of Industries, 26.
  • 3. Amann, B., & Jaussaud, J. (2012). Family and non-family business resilience in an economic downturn. Asia Pacific Review, 18.
  • 4. Ballesteros, L., Useem, M., & Wry, T. (2017). Masters of disasters? An empirical analysis of how societies benefit from corporate disaster aid. Academy of Management Journal, 60.
  • 5. Barton, M.A., Sutcliffe, K.M., Vogus, T.J., & DeWitt, T. (2015). Performing under uncertainty: contextualized engagement in wildland firefighting. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 23.
  • 6. Bauweraerts, J., & Colot, O. (2014). La resilience organisationnelle au sein des entreprises familiales: Mythe ou realite? Researches en Sciences de Gestion - Management Sciences - Ciencias de Gestion, 101.
  • 7. Benner, M.J., & Tushman, M.L. (2015). Reflections on the 2013 decade award - "Exploitation, exploration, and process management: Dilemma revisited" ten years later. Academy of Management Review, 40.
  • 8. Bettinelli, C., Sciascia, S., Randerson, K., & Fayolle, A. (2017). Researching entrepreneurship in family firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 55.
  • 9. Bhamra, R., Dani, S., & Burnard, K. (2011). Resilience: the concept, a literature review and future directions. International Journal of Production Research, 49.
  • 10. Block, J., Miller, D., Jaskiewicz, P., & Spiegel, F. (2013). Economic and technological importance of innovations in large family and founder firms: An analysis of patent data. Family Business Review, 26.
  • 11. Boin, A., Comfort, L.K., & Demchak, C.C. (2010). The rise of resilience. In: L.K. Comfort, A. Boin, C.C. Demchak (eds.), Designing resilience: Preparing for extreme events. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • 12. Cantarello, S., Martini, A., & Nosela, A. (2012). A multi-level model for organizational ambidexterity in the search phase of the innovation process. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21.
  • 13. Carmeli, A., & Markman, G.D. (2011). Capture, governance, and resilience: Strategy implications from the history of Rome. Strategic Management Journal, 32.
  • 14. Carmeli, A., Friedman, Y., & Tishler, A. (2013). Cultivating a resilient top management team: The importance of relational connections and strategic decision comprehensiveness. Safety Science, 51.
  • 15. Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., & Steier, L.P. (2011). Resilience of family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35.
  • 16. Coutu, L.D. (2002). How resilience works. Harvard Business Review, 80(5).
  • 17. Debicki, B.J., Van de Graaff Randolph, R.V., & Sobczak, M. (2017). Socioemotional wealth and family firm performance: A stakeholder approach. Journal of Managerial Issues, 29.
  • 18. Di Stefano, G., Peteraf, M., & Verona, G. (2014). The organizational drivetrain: A road to integration of dynamic capabilities research. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28.
  • 19. Dossena, G. (2016). Conclusion to part I. In: K. Randerson, A. Fayolle, C. Bettinelli, G. Dossena (eds.), Family entrepreneurship: Rethinking the research agenda. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • 20. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32.
  • 21. Evert, R.E., Martin, J.A., McLeod, M.S., & Payne, G.T. (2015). Empirics in family business research. Progress, challenges, and the path ahead. Family Business Review, 29.
  • 22. Fainshmidt, S., Pezeshkan, A., Lance Frazier, M., Nair, A., & Markowski, E. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational performance: A meta-analytic evaluationand extension. Journal of Management Studies, 53.
  • 23. Gao, C., Zuzul, T., Jones, G., & Khanna, T. (2017). Overcoming institutional raids: A reputational - based view of long-run survival. Strategic Management Journal, 38.
  • 24. Gittell, J.H., Cameron, K., Lim, S., & Rivas, V. (2006). Relationships, layoffs, and organizational resilience: Airline industry responses to September 11. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 42.
  • 25. Gunasekaran, A., Rai, B.K., & Griffin, M. (2011). Resilience and competitiveness of small and medium size enterprises: An empirical research. International Journal of Production Research, 49(18).
  • 26. Habbershon, T.G., & Williams, M.L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12.
  • 27. Hamel, G., & Valikangas, L. (2003). The quest for resilience. Harvard Business Review, 81.
  • 28. Harrison, J.S., Bosse, D.A., & Phillips, R.A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31.
  • 29. Hawkins, R.L., & Maurer, K. (2010). Bonding, bridging and linking: How social capital operated in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina. British Journal of SocialWork, 40.
  • 30. Helfat, C.E., & Martin, J.A. (2015). Dynamic managerial capabilities. Review and assessment of managerial impact on strategic change. Journal of Management, 41.
  • 31. Hill, S.A., & Birkinshaw, J. (2014). Ambidexterity and survival in corporate venture units. Journal of Management, 40.
  • 32. Hinkin, T.R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1.
  • 33. Hortinha, P., Lages, C., & Lages, L.F. (2011). The trade-off between customer and technology orientations: Impact on innovation capabilities and export performance. Journal of International Marketing, 19.
  • 34. Irava, W.J., & Moores, K. (2010). Clarifying the strategic advantage of familiness: Unbounding its dimensions and highlighting its paradoxes, Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1.
  • 35. James, A.E., Jennings, J.E., & Breitkreuz, R.S. (2012). Worlds Apart? Rebridging the. Distance between Family Science and Family Business. Family Business Review, 25.
  • 36. Kahn, W.A., Barton, M.A., & Fellows, S. (2013). Organizational crises and the disturbance of relational systems. Academy of Management Review, 38.
  • Kantur, D., & Iseri-Say, A. (2015). Measuring organizational resilience: A scale development. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 4(3).
  • 37. Karna, A., Richter, A., & Riesenkampff, E. (2016). Revisiting the role of the environment in the capabilities-financial performance relationship: A meta-analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 37.
  • 38. Kendra, J.M., & Wachtendorf, T. (2001). Elements of community resilience in the World Trade Center attack. 48th North American Meeting of the Regional Science Association Int., Charleston, SC.
  • 39. Lai, Y., Saridakis, G., Blackburn, R., & Johnstone, S. (2016). Are the HR responses of small firms different from large firms in Times of recession? Journal of BusinessVenturing, 31.
  • 40. Lazega, E., & Snijders, T.A.B. (Eds.) (2016). Multilevel network analysis for the social sciences: Theory, methods and applications. New York: Springer.
  • 41. Lee, A.V., Vargo, J., & Seville, E. (2013). Developing a tool to measure and compare organizations' resilience. Natural Hazards Review, 14.
  • 42. Lengnick-Hall, C.A., & Beck, T.E. (2005). Adaptive fit versus robust transformation: How organizations respond to environmental change. Journal of Management, 31.
  • 43. Lengnick-Hall, C.A., & Beck, T.E. (2009). Resilience capacity and strategic agility: Prerequisites for thriving in a dynamic environment. In: Nemeth, C., Hollnagel, E. Dekker, S. (eds.), Preparation and restoration. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
  • 44. Lengnick-Hall, C.A., Beck, T.E., & Lengnick-Hall, M.L. (2011). Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resources management. Human Resource Management Review, 21.
  • 45. Limnios, E.A.M., Mazzarol, T., Ghadouani, A., & Schilizzi, S.G.M. (2014). The resilience architecture framework: Four organizational archetypes. European Management Journal, 32.
  • 46. Linnenluecke, M.K. (2017). Resilience in business and management research: A review of influential publications and a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19.
  • 47. Madsen, P.M., & Desai, V. (2010). Failing to learn? The effects of failure and success on organizational learning in the global orbital launch vehicle industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53.
  • 48. Makkonen, H., Pohjola, M., Olkkonen, R., & Koponen, A. (2014). Dynamic capabilities and firm performance in financial crisis. Journal of Business Research, 67.
  • 49. Marrone, J.A. (2010). Team boundary spanning: A multilevel review of past research and proposals for the future. Journal of Management, 36.
  • 50. McManus, S., Seville, E., Vargo, J., & Brunsdon, D. (2008). Facilitated process for improving organizational resilience. Natural Hazards Review, 9.
  • 51. Meyer, A.D. (1982). Adapting to environmental jolts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27.
  • 52. Mihalache, O.R., Jensen, J.J.P., van den Bosch, F.A.J., & Volberda, H.W. (2014). Top management team shared leadership and organizational ambidexterity: A moderated mediation framework. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8.
  • 53. Miller C.C., Washburn N.T., & Glick W.H. (2013). The myth of firm performance. Organization Science, 24.
  • 54. Miller, D. (2006). Priorities, practices and strategies in successful and failing family businesses: an elaboration and test of the configuration perspective. Strategic Organization, 4.
  • 55. Moore, S.B., & Manring, S.L. (2009). Strategy development in small and medium sized enterprises for sustainability and increased value creation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17.
  • 56. Neilson, G.L., Pasternack, B.L., & Van Nuys, K.E. (2005). The passive-aggressive organization. Harvard Business Review, 83(10).
  • 57. O'Reilly, C.A., & Tushman, M.L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28.
  • 58. Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., & Bansal, P. (2016). The long-term benefits of organizational resilience through sustainable business practices. Strategic Management Journal, 37.
  • 59. Pal, R., Torstensson, H., & Mattilla, H. (2014). Antecedents of organizational resilience in economic crises - an empirical study of Swedish textile and clothing SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 147.
  • 60. Parsons, D. (2007). National organizational resilience framework workshop: The outcomes. National Organisational Resilience Framework Workshop. Retrieved from: http:///www.tisn.gov.au/Documents/Final+Workshop.pdf (22.11.2012).
  • 61. Powley, E.H. (2009). Reclaiming resilience and safety: resilience activation in the critical period of crises. Human Relations, 62.
  • 62. Rahmandad, H., & Repenning, N. (2016). Capability erosion dynamics. Strategic Management Journal, 37.
  • 63. Reilly, T.M., & Jones III, R. (2017). Mixed methodology in family business research: Past accomplishments and perspectives for the future. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 8.
  • 64. Richtnér, A., & Löfsten, H. (2014). Managing in turbulence: how capacity of resilience influences creativity, R&D Management, 44.
  • 65. Sheffi, Y. (2005). The resilient enterprise: overcoming vulnerability for competitive advantage. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • 66. Shepherd, D.A., & Williams, T.A. (2014). Local venturing as compassion organizing in the aftermath of a natural disaster: The role of localness and community in reducing suffering. Journal of Management Studies, 51.
  • 67. Smith, W.K., & Tracey, P. (2016). Institutional complexity and paradox theory: Complementarities of competing demands. Strategic Organization, 14.
  • 68. Staw, B.M., Sandelands, L.E., & Dutton, J.E. (1981). Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26.
  • 69. Stuart, H.C., & Moore, C. (2017). Shady characters: The implication of illicit organizational roles for resilient team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 60.
  • 70. Sutcliffe, K.M., & Vogus, T.J. (2003). Organizing for resilience. In: Cameron, K.S., Dutton, J.E., Quinn, R.E. (eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco: Berret-Koehler.
  • 71. Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leith, S. (2016). Dynamic capability and organizational agility: Risk uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review, 58(4).
  • 72. Teece, D.J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 20.
  • 73. Teixeira, E.O., & Werther, Jr., W.B. (2013). Resilience: Continuous renewal of competitive advantage. Business Horizons, 56.
  • 74. Topper, B., & Lagadec, P. (2013). Fractal crises: A new path for crisis theory and management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 21.
  • 75. Turner, N., & Kutsch, E. (2016). Understanding resilience in organizational operations - an ambidexterity perspective. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Anaheim.
  • 76. Van der Vegt, G.S., Essens, P., Wahlstrom, M., & George, G. (2015). From the editors. Managing risk and resilience. Academy of Management Journal, 58.
  • 77. Van Essen, M., Strike, V.M., Carney, M., & Sapp, S. (2015). The resilient family firm: Stakeholder outcomes and institutional effects. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23.
  • 78. Weick, K.E., & Sutcliffe, K.M. (2015). Managing the unexpected: Sustained performance in a complex world. Hoboken, NJ: John Willey & Sons.
  • 79. Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M., & Obstfeld, D. (1999). Organizing for high reliability. Processes of collective mindfulness. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21.
  • 80. Wicker, P., Filo, K., & Cuskelly, G. (2013). Organizational resilience of community sports clubs impacted by natural disasters. Journal of Sports Management, 27.
  • 81. Williams, T.A., & Shepherd, D.A. (2016). Building resilience or providing sustenance: Different paths of emergent ventures in the aftermath of the Haiti earthquake. Academy of Management Journal, 59.
  • 82. Williams, T.A., Gruber, D.A., Sutcliffe, K.M., Shepherd, D.A., & Zhao E.Y. (2017). Organizational response to adversity: fusing crisis management and resilience research streams. Academy of Management Annals, 11.
  • 83. Wilson, S.R., Whitmayer, J.G., Pieper, T.M, Astrachan, J.H., Hair, J.F., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). Method trends and method needs: Examining methods needed for accelerating the field. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5.
  • 84. Woods, D.D., & Wreathall, J. (2008). Stress-strain plots as a basis for assessing system resilience. In: E. Hollnagel, C.P. Nemeth, S. Dekker (eds.), Resilience engineering perspectives, volume 1: Remaining sensitive to the possibility of failure. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
  • 85. Ylikoski, P., & Aydinonat, N.E. (2014). Understanding with theoretical models. Journal of Economic Methodology, 21.
  • 86. Zhao, E.Y., Fisher, G., Lounsbury, M., & Miller, D. (2016). Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 38.
  • 87. Zolli, A., & Healy, A. (2012). Resilience: Why things bounce back. New York: Free Press.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171559271

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.