PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2019 | nr 4 | 3--10
Tytuł artykułu

Walidacja narzędzia pomiarowego w naukach o zarządzaniu

Autorzy
Warianty tytułu
Measurement Scale Validation in Management Research
Języki publikacji
PL
Abstrakty
Rozwój nauk o zarządzaniu przejawia się formułowaniem zależności pojęć, która umożliwia predykcję zmian kluczowych zmiennych oraz zdolność podejmowania lepszych decyzji. Warunkiem rozwoju jest pomiar konstruktów. Niniejszy artykuł sytuuje walidację w procesie rozwoju skal pomiarowych. Proponuje cztery współzależne procedury walidacji: treściową, fasadową, konstruktu oraz nomologiczną. Wyjaśnia ich istotę, związki z psychometrią, bieżącą praktykę nauk o zarządzaniu oraz formułuje rekomendacje w zakresie doskonalenia metodologii badań. (abstrakt autora)
EN
The development of the management theory requires the formulation of construct interrelations, which allows for predicting key variables behavior and helps taking better decisions. It is dependent upon construct measurement. This paper locates validity assessment in the process of scale development. Four validity procedures have been outlined: content, face, construct and nomological ones. Their respective contents, psychometric grounds, current management literature practice and recommendations have been formulated. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
3--10
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie
Bibliografia
  • [1] Bacharach S.B. (1989), Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation, "Academy of Management Review", Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 496-515.
  • [2] Bagozzi R.P., Yi Y., Phillips L.W. (1991), Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research, "Administrative Science Quarterly", Vol. 39, pp. 421-458.
  • [3] Bagozzi R.P., Edwards J.R. (1998), A General Approach for Representing Constructs in Organizational Research, "Organizational Research Methods", Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 45-87.
  • [4] Boudreau M.C., Gefen D" Straub D.W. (2001), Validation in Information Systems Research: A State-of-the-art Assessment, "MIS Quarterly", Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 1-16.
  • [5] Boyd B.K., Gove S., Hitt M.A. (2005), Construct Measurement in Strategic Management Research: Illusion or Reality? "Strategic Management Journal", Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 239-257.
  • [6] Campbell D.T., Fiske D.W. (1959), Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-multimethod Matrix, "Psychological Bulletin", Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 81-105.
  • [7] Chandler A.D. (1977), The visible hand: The Managerial Revolution in Americana Business, Cambridge MA, Harvard Belknap.
  • [8] Chandler G.N., Lyon D.W. (2001), Issues of Research Design and Construct Measurement in Entrepreneurship Research: The Past Decade, "Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice", Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 101-113.
  • [9] Chen M.J., Su K.H., Tsai W. (2007), Competitive Tension: The Awareness-motivation-capability Perspective, "Academy of Management Journal", Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 101-118.
  • [10] Churchill G.A. Jr (1979), A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs, "Journal of Marketing Research", Vol. 16, pp. 64-73.
  • [11] Cronbach L.J., Meehl P.E. (1955), Construct Validity in Psychological Tests, "Psychological Bulletin", Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 281-302.
  • [12] Czakon W. (2014), Kryteria oceny rygoru metodologicznego badań w naukach o zarządzaniu, "Organizacja i Kierowanie", Vol. 1, Nr 161, s. 51-62.
  • [13] Czakon W. (2015), Mikrofundamenty rozwoju sieci międzyorganizacyjnych, "Marketing i Rynek", (5 (CD)), s. 798-807.
  • [14] Czakon W. (2017), Tworzenie teorii w naukach o zarządzaniu, [w:] A. Sopińska, P. Wachowiak, Wyzwania współczesnego zarządzania strategicznego, Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH w Warszawie, Warszawa, s. 143-160.
  • [15] Danneels E. (2016), Survey Measures of First-and Second-order Competences, "Strategic Management Journal", Vol. 37, No. 10, pp. 2174-2188.
  • [16] Diamantopoulos A., Siguaw J.A. (2006), Formative Versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development: A Comparison and Empirical Illustration, "British Journal of Management", Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 263-282.
  • [17] Diamantopoulos A., Siguaw J.A., Cadogan J.W. (2008), Measuring Abstract Constructs in Management and Organizational Research: The Case of Export Coordination, "British Journal of Management", Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 389-395.
  • [18] Garver M.S., Mentzer J.T. (1999), Logistics Research Methods: Employing Structural Equation Modeling to Test for Construct Validity, "Journal of Business Logistics", Vol. 20, No. 1, pp 33-57.
  • [19] Gatignon H., Tushman M.L., Smith W., Anderson, P. (2002), A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics, "Management Science", Vol. 48, No. 9, pp. 1103-1122.
  • [20] Gavetti G. (2005), Cognition and Hierarchy: Rethinking the Microfoundations of Capabilities' Development, "Organization Science", Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 599-617.
  • [21] Gefen D., Rigdon E.E., Straub D. (2011), Editors Comments: An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Administrative and Social Science Research, "MIS Quarterly", Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. iii-xiv.
  • [22] Gerbing D.W., Anderson J.C. (1988), An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and its Assessment, "Journal of Marketing Research", Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 186-192.
  • [23] Glińska-Neweś A. (2017), Pozytywne relacje interpersonalne w zarządzaniu, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń.
  • [24] Govindarajan V., Kopalle P.K. (2006), Disruptiveness of Innovations: Measurement and an Assessment of Reliability and Validity,. "Strategic Management Journal", Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 189-199.
  • [25] Hagger M.S., Gucciardi D.F., Chatzisarantis N.L. (2017), On Nomological Validity and Auxiliary Assumptions: The Importance of Simultaneously Testing Effects in Social Cognitive Theories Applied to Health Behavior and Some Guidelines, "Frontiers in Psychology", Vol. 8, No. 1933, pp. 1-12.
  • [26] Hakala H. (2011), Strategic Orientations in Management Literature: Three Approaches to Understanding the Interaction between Market, Technology, Entrepreneurial and Learning Orientations, "International Journal of Management Reviews", Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 199-217.
  • [27] Hardesty D.M., Bearden, W.O. (2004), The Use of Expert Judges in Scale Development: Implications for Improving Face Validity of Measures of Unobservable Constructs, "Journal of Business Research", Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 98-107.
  • [28] Hatchuel A. (2005), Towards an Epistemology of Collective Action: Management Research as a Responsive and Actionable Discipline, "European Management Review", Vol. 2, No. l, pp. 36-47.
  • [29] Haynes S.N., Richard D., Kubany E.S. (1995), Content Validity in Psychological Assessment: A Functional Approach to Concepts and Methods, "Psychological Assessment", Vol. 7, No. 3, p. 238.
  • [30] Hoskisson R.E., Hitt M.A., Johnson R.A., Moesel D.D. (1993), Construct Validity of an Objective (Entropy) Categorical Measure of Diversification Strategy, "Strategic Management Journal", Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 215-235.
  • [31] Hulland J. (1999), Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Four Recent Studies, "Strategic Management Journal", Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 195-204.
  • [32] Jöreskog K.G., Sörbom D. (1982), Recent Developments in Structural Equation Modeling, "Journal of Marketing Research", Vol. 19, pp. 404-416.
  • [33] Kawa A. (2017), Orientacja sieciowa przedsiębiorstw branży usług logistycznych, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu, Poznań.
  • [34] Klimas P., Czakon W. (2018), Organizational Innovativeness and Coopetition: A Study of Video Game Developers, "Review of Managerial Science", Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 469-497.
  • [35] Klimas P. (2019), Relacje współtworzenia innowacji w ekosystemach. Kontekst ekosystemu gamingowego, Wyd. C.H. Beck, Warszawa.
  • [36] Mitręga M., Forkmann S., Ramos С., Henneberg S.C. (2012), Networking Capability in Business Relationships - Concept and Scale Development, "Industrial Marketing Management", Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 739-751.
  • [37] Nevo B. (1985), Face Validity Revisited, "Journal of Educational Measurement", Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 287-293.
  • [38] Nunnally J.C. (1975), Psychometric Theory - 25 Years Ago and Now, "Educational Researcher", Vol. 4, No. 10, pp. 7-21.
  • [39] Nunnally J.C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY.
  • [40] O'Leary-Kelly S.W., Vokurka R.J. (1998), The Empirical Assessment of Construct Validity, "Journal of Operations Management", Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 387-405.
  • [41] Pennings J.M., Smidts A. (2000), Assessing the Construct Validity of Risk Attitude, "Management Science", Vol. 46, No. 10, pp. 1337-1348.
  • [42] Peter J.P. (1981), Construct validity: A Review of Basic Issues and Marketing Practices, "Journal of Marketing Research", Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 133-145.
  • [43] Peter J.P., Churchill G.A. Jr (1986), Relationships Among Research Design Choices and Psychometric Properties of Rating Scales: A Meta-analysis, "Journal of Marketing Research", Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 1-10.
  • [44] Robins J.A., Wiersema M.F. (2003), The Measurement of Corporate Portfolio Strategy: Analysis of the Content Validity of Related Diversification Indexes, "Strategic Management Journal", Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 39-59.
  • [45] Rossiter J.R. (2008), Content Validity of Measures of Abstract Constructs in Management and Organizational Research, "British Journal of Management", Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 380-388.
  • [46] Suddaby R. (2010), Editor's Comments: Construct Clarity in Theories of Management and Organization, "Academy of Management Review", Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 346-357.
  • [47] Venkatraman N. (1989), Strategic Orientation of Business Enterprises: The Construct, Dimensionality, and Measurement, "Management Science", Vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 942-962.
  • [48] Venkatraman N., Grant J.H. (1986), Construct Measurement in Organizational Strategy Research: A Critique and Proposal, "Academy of Management Review", Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 71-87.
  • [49] Zaichkowsky J.L. (2015), Review and Reply to: "Why You Must Use my C-OAR-SE Meffrod","Australasian Marketing Journal", Vol. 3, No. 23, pp. 261-262.
  • [50] Zakrzewska-Bielawska A. (2018), Strategie rozwoju przedsiębiorstw. Nowe spojrzenie, Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171560589

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.