The Importance of Combining Various Methods in Assessing Poverty Level: the Case of Marine Capture Fishermen in Bengkulu Province, Indonesia

• Autorzy: Gita Mulyasari , Irham , Lestari Rahayu Waluyati , Any Suryantini
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The measurement of poverty can be analyzed by various methods and each method has its own advantages and disadvantages. The single dimensional model has a weakness since it only measures poverty in its monetary aspect, as income, while multidimensional method measures poverty by considering various dimensions but excluding the income aspect. Furthermore, it is important to combine both models so that the measurement of poverty could be more comprehensive. The study describes the method of poverty measurement by using: 1) single dimension poverty measurement, promoted by the Asian Development Bank (ADB), the World Bank, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO); 2) Multidimensional poverty measurement, promoted by the Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS), and Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) by Alkire and Foster. The study was conducted in Bengkulu Province, Indonesia, and the data was collected by means of interviewing 90 marine capture fishermen, randomly selected. The results of this study show that each poverty measurement gives a difference in the poverty level of fishermen because it is not able to describe the actual condition of fishermen's poverty. By combining both models, it is found that fishermen's poverty is affected by ship weight, fishing distance, and household size. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Poverty; Poverty threshold; Fishery

PL

Ubóstwo; Granice ubóstwa; Rybołówstwo

• Czasopismo: Journal of International Studies
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 12
• Numer: nr 2
• Strony: 241--257

Twórcy

autor

Gita Mulyasari

• Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia

autor

Irham

• Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM), Indonesia

autor

Lestari Rahayu Waluyati

• Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM), Indonesia

autor

Any Suryantini

• Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM), Indonesia

Bibliografia

• Acheson, J. M. (1981). Anthropology of fishing. Annual review of anthropology, 10(1), 275-316.
• Agola, N. O., & Awange, J. L. (2014). Globalized poverty and environment: 21st Century Challenges and Innovative Solutions. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-39733-2.
• Alamgir, M., & Ahmed, S. (1988). Poverty and income distribution in Bangladesh. Rural poverty in South Asia, 11-38.
• Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Understandings and misunderstandings of multidimensional poverty measurement. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 9(2), 289-314.
• Alkire, S., & Santos, M. E. (2010). Acute multidimensional poverty: A new index for developing countries. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1815243.
• Boedhisantoso, S. (1999). Komunitas lokal di kawasan pesisir dan pemberdayaannya. Makalah Lokakarya Pembangunan Pranata Sosial Komunitas Pesisir. Depok.
• BPS (Central Bureau of Statistics). (2017). Bengkulu Province in Figures.
• Chernichovsky, D., & Meesook, O. A. (1981). Poverty in Indonesia: A profile. World Bank Staff Working Paper, 671, Washington DC.
• Emmerson, D. K. (1980). Rethinking artisanal fisheries development: Western concepts, Asian experiences. World Bank Staff Working Paper No. 423.
• Faturochman, F., & Molo, M. (1994). Karakteristik rumah tangga miskin di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Populasi 5(1).
• Firdausy, C., & Tisdell, C. A. (1992). Determinants of rural income and poverty at the village level in Bali, Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies, 29(1), 19-34.
• Gaiha, R. (1987). Inequality, earning and participation among the poor in rural India. The Journal of Development Studies, 23(4), 491-508
• Harahap, S. S. (2006). Analisis kritis atas laporan keuangan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
• Hermanto, S., (1995). Kemiskinan di pedesaan: Masalah dan alternatif penanggulangannya. Pusat Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian. Bogor: IPB
• Kuncoro, M., (2006). Ekonomika Pembangunan: Teori, Masalah, dan Kebijakan. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.
• Kusnadi. (2002). Konflik Sosial Nelayan Kemiskinan dan Perebutan Sumberdaya Perikanan. Yogyakarta: LKiS Pelangi Aksara.
• Kuznet, S., (2002). Economic development, the family, and income distribution. Selected essays. Cambridge University Press
• Lanjouw, P., & Ravallion, M. (1995). Poverty and household size. The Economic Journal, 105(433),1415-1434.
• Narayan, D., & Petesch, P. (2007). Agency, opportunity structures, and poverty escapes. Moving out of poverty: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on mobility, 1(1). Palgrave Macmillan for the World Bank. Basingstoke.
• Nasir, M., & Maulizar, S. D. (2008). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kemiskinan rumah tangga di Kabupaten Purworejo. Jurnal Eksekutif, 5(4).
• Panayotou, T. (1982). Management concepts for small-scale fisheries, economic, and social aspect. FAO fisheries technical paper, 228. Rome. Italy.
• Prayitno, H., & Aryad, L. (1987). Petani dan kemiskinan. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
• Rahimi, F. A. F. (2015). The impact of security and regional integration on poverty reduction in Afghanistan. Journal of International Studies, 8(1), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2015/8-1/16
• Siregar, H., & Wahyuniarti, D. (2008). Dampak pertumbuhan ekonomi terhadap penurunan jumlah penduduk miskin. Retrieved from http://pse.litbang.deptan.go.id/ind/pdffiles/PROS_2008_MAK3.pdf
• Setiadi. (2006). Mengungkap pengentasan kemiskinan secara partisipatoris. Retrieved from http://www.ugm.ac.id/index.php?page=rilis&artikel=307
• Subade, R.F., & Abdullah, N.M.R. (1993). Are fishers profit maximizers? The case of gillnetters in Negros Occidental and Iloilo, Philippines. Asian Fisheries Science, 6, 39-49.
• Suryawati, C. (2005). Memahami kemiskinan secara multidimensional. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Kesehatan, 8(3), 121-129.
• Viet-Wilson, J. H. (1986). Paradigm of poverty: A rehabilitation of BS Rowntree. Journal of Social Policy, 15(1), 69-99.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14254/2071-8330.2019/12-2/15