Ecosystem Services in Competing Land Use Model with Infrastructure Effect

• Autorzy: Ivan Telega
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The development of linear infrastructure increases the degree of fragmentation of natural areas and has a negative impact on biodiversity and the range of available ecosystem services. The basic competing land use model is expanded to include infrastructure development. The extended model leads to the conclusion that due to the dual impact of the infrastructure (lowering the value of ecosystem services and increasing the private rents to developed land), the size of the natural area in the long-term equilibrium will be lower compared to the basic model. The preservation of nature ceases to be profitable enough. Infrastructure also reduces the marginal costs of conversion and thus increasing the volume of natural land being converted at avery moment along the transition path. If the decisions on optimal management of natural areas and infrastructure development are undertaken together, the result is a lower density of the infrastructure network and a larger ecosystem area in the steady state. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Land use; Ecosystem; Econometrics

PL

Użytkowanie ziemi; Ekosystem; Ekonometria

• Czasopismo: Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics (CEJEME)
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 11
• Numer: nr 2
• Strony: 73--92

Twórcy

autor

Ivan Telega

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie

Bibliografia

• [1] Barbier E.B., Burgess J.C., Greinger A., (2010), The forest transition: Towards a more comprehensive theoretical framework, Land Use Policy 27, 98-107.
• [2] Barbier E.B., (2010), Capitalizing on Nature. Ecosystems as Natural Assets, Cambridge University Press, New York.
• [3] Barbier E.B., Tesfaw A., (2015), Explaining forest transitions: The role of governance, Ecological Economics 119, 252-261.
• [4] Barbier E.B., Delacote P., Wolfersberger J., (2017), The economic analysis of the forest transition: A review, Journal of Forest Economics 27, 10-17.
• [5] Bateman J., Harwood A.R., Mace G.M., Watson R.T., Abson D.J., Andrews B., Binner A., Crowe A., Day B.H., Dugdale S., Fezzi C., Foden J., Hadley D., Haines-Young R., Hulme M., Kontoleon A., Lovett A.A., Munday P., Pascual U., Paterson J., Perino G., Sen A., Siriwardena G., van Soest D., Termansen M., (2013), Bringing Ecosystem Services into Economic Decision-Making: Land Use in the United Kingdom, Science 341(6141), 45-50.
• [6] Cardinale B.J., Duffy J.E., Gonzalez A., Hooper D.U., Perrings C., Venail P., Narwani A., Mace G.M., Tilman D., Wardle D.A., Kinzig A.P., Daily G.C., Loreau M., Grace J.B., Larigauderie A., Srivastava D.S., Naeem S., (2012), Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity, Nature 486, 59-67.
• [7] Constanza R., Daly H.E., (1992), Natural Capital and Sustainable Development, Conservation Biology 6(1), 37-46.
• [8] Costanza R., d'Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O'Neill R.V., Paruelo J., Raskin R.G., Sutton P., van den Belt M., (1997), The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature 387, 253-260.
• [9] Daily G.C., (1997), Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, Island Press.
• [10] De Groot R., Brander L., van der Ploeg S., Costanza R., Bernard F., Braat L., Christie M., Crossman N., Ghermandi A., Hein L., Hussain S., Kumar P., McVittie A., Portela R., Rodriguez L.C., ten Brink P., van Beukering P., (2012), Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units, Ecosystem Services 1(1), 50-61.
• [11] Diaz S., Fargione J., Chapin III F.S., Tilman D., (2006), Biodiversity Loss Threatens Human Well-Being, PLoS Biology 4(8).
• [12] Diaz S., Demissew S., Carabias J., Joly C., Lonsdale M., Ash N., Larigauderie A., Adhikari J.R., Arico S., Báldi A., Bartuska A., Baste I.A., Bilgin A., Brondizio E., Chan K. MA, Figueroa V.E., Duraiappah A., Fischer M., Hill R., Koetz T., Leadley P., Lyver P., Mace G.M., Martin-Lopez B., Okumura M., Pacheco D., Pascual U., Pérez E.S., Reyers B., Roth E., Saito O., Scholes R.J., Sharma N., Tallis H., Thaman R., Watson R., Yahara T., Hamid Z.A., Akosim C., AlHafedh Y., Allahverdiyev R., Amankwah E., Asah S.T., Asfaw Z., Bartus G., Brooks L.A., Caillaux J., Dalle G., Darnaedi D., Driver A., Erpul G., EscobarEyzaguirre P., Failler P., Fouda A.M.M., Fu B., Gundimeda H., Hashimoto S., Homer F., Lavorel S., Lichtenstein G., Mala W.A., Mandivenyi W., Matczak P., Mbizvo C., Mehrdadi M., Metzger J.P., Mikissa J.B., Moller H., Mooney H.A., Mumby P., Nagendra H., Nesshover C., Oteng-Yeboah A.A., Pataki G., Roué M., Rubis J., Schultz M., Smith P., Sumaila R., Takeuchi K., Thomas S., Verma M., Yeo-Chang Y., Zlatanova D., (2015), The IPBES Conceptual Framework connecting nature and people, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14, 1-16.
• [13] EEA, (2006), Land accounts for Europe 1990-2000. Towards integrated land and ecosystem accounting, available at: www.eea.europa.eu.
• [14] EEA, (2017), Landscapes in transition - An account of 25 years of land cover change in Europe, EEA Report No 10/2017, available at: www.eea.europa.eu.
• [15] EEA, (2011), Landscape fragmentation in Europe, available at: www.eea. europa.eu.
• [16] EEA, (2015), The European environment - state and outlook 2015: synthesis report, available at: www.eea.europa.eu.
• [17] Engel S., Pagiola S., Wunder S., (2013), Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues, Ecosystem Services 6, 16-30.
• [18] Fearnside P.M., (2015), Highway construction as a force in the destruction of the Amazon forest, [in:] Handbook of Road Ecology, [ed.:] R. van der Ree, D. J. Smith, C. Grilo, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
• [19] Gómez-Baggethun E., de Groot R., Lomas P.L., Montes C., (2010), The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes, Ecological Economics 69, 1209-1218.
• [20] Goldstein J.H., Caldarone G., Duarte T.K., Ennaanay D., Hannahs N., Mendoza G., Polasky S., Wolny S., Daily G.C., (2012), Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decision, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(19), 7565-7570.
• [21] Guerry A.D., Polasky S., Lubchenco J., Chaplin-Kramer R., Daily G.C., Griffin R., Ruckelshaus M., Bateman I.J., Duraiappah A., Elmqvist T., Feldman M.W., Folke C., Hoekstra J., Kareiva P.M., Keeler B.L., Li S., McKenzie E., Ouyang Z., Reyers B., Ricketts T.H., Rockström J., Tallis H., Vira B., (2015), Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(24), 7348-7355.
• [22] Hartwick J.M., Van Long N., Tian H., (2001), Deforestation and Development in a Small Open Economy, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41(3), 235-251.
• [23] Jaeger J. (2015), Improving environmental impact assessment and road planning at the landscape scale, [in:] Handbook of Road Ecology, [ed:] R. van der Ree, D. J. Smith, C. Grilo, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
• [24] Kamien M.I., Schwartz N.L., (2012), Dynamic optimization. The Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control in Economics and Management, Dover Publications Inc.
• [25] Liu J., Li S., Ouyang Z., Tam C., Chen X., (2008), Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(28), 9477-9482.
• [26] Maes J., Paracchini M.L., Zulian G., Dunbar M.B., Alkemade R., (2012), Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity and habitat conservation status in Europe, Biological Conservation 155, 1-12.
• [27] Mather A.S., (1992), The Forest Transition, Area 24(4), 367-379.
• [28] Meadows D.H., Meadows N.L., Randers J., Behrens W.W., (1972), The Limits To Growth: a Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind, Universe Books, New York.
• [29] Muradian R., Corbera E., Pascual U., Kosoye N., May P.H., (2010), Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services, Ecological Economics 69, 1202-1208.
• [30] Munoz-Pina C., A. Guevara A., Torres J.M., Brana J., (2008), Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico's forests: Analysis, negotiations and results, Ecological Economics 65(4), 725-736.
• [31] Pagiola S., (2008), Payments for Environmental Services in Costa Rica, Ecological Economics, 65(4), 712-724.
• [32] Parks P.J., Barbier E.B, Burgess J.C., (1998), The Economics of Forest Land Use in Temperate and Tropical Areas, Environmental and Resource Economics 11(3-4), 473-478.
• [33] Pearce D. and Turner R.K., (1990), Economics of natural resources and the environment, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London.
• [34] Polasky S., Lewis D.J., Plantinga A.J., Nelson E., (2014), Implementing the optimal provision of ecosystem services, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(17), 6248-6253.
• [35] Raudsepp-Hearnea C., Peterson G.D., Bennett E.M., (2010), Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(11), 5242-5247.
• [36] Rindfuss R., Walsh S.J., Turner II B.L., Fox J., Mishra V., (2004), Developing a science of land change: Challenges and methodological issues, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(39), 13976-13981.
• [37] Sanchez-Azofeifa G.A., Plaff A., Robalino J.A., Boomhower J.P., (2007), Costa Rica's payment for environmental services program: intention, implementation, and impact, Conservation Biology 21(5), 1165-1173.
• [38] Schomers S., Matzdorf B., (2013), Payments for ecosystem services: A review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries, Ecosystem Services 6, 16-30.
• [39] TEEB, (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB, available at: http://www.teebweb.org.
• [40] Telega I., Telega A., (2017), Natural Capital Changes in Poland - Integrating Spatial and Economic Approach, Economic and Environmental Studies 17(4), 907-922.
• [41] The Millenium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis, Island Press, Washington.
• [42] UNEP, (2014), Assessing Global Land Use: Balancing Consumption With Sustainable Supply, available at: http://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500. 11822/8861
• [43] van der Ree R., Smith D.J., Grilo C., (2015), The ecological effects of linear infrastructure and traffic: Challenges and opportunities of rapid global growth, [in:] Handbook of Road Ecology, [ed:] R. van der Ree, D. J. Smith, C. Grilo, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
• [44] Vatn A., (2010), An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services, Ecological Economics 69, 1245-1252.
• [45] Wolfensberger J., Delacote P., Garcia S., (2015), An empirical analysis of forest transition and land-use change in developing countries, Ecological Economics 119, 241-251.
• [46] Wunder S., (2005), Payments for environmental services: Some nuts and bolts, CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 42, Center for International Forestry Research.
• [47] Wunder S., (2015), Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services, Ecological Economics 117, 234-243.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/cejeme.2019.129772