Razvitie instituta vzaimnogo priznaniâ i ispolneniâ sudebnyh rešenij v stranah Evropejskogo Soûza

• Autorzy: Elena Maystrovich , Elena Kucheryavaya

Warianty tytułu

Development of the Institution of Mutual Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in the Countries of the European Union

• Języki publikacji: RU

Abstrakty

EN

The free movement of judicial decisions on the territory of the European Union presupposes a high level of mutual trust between the judicial bodies of the Member States. From the citizens' point of view, the key issue is the balance between the rights of the plaintiffs and the defendants, i.e. the right to access to justice (to sue) and the right to defence. Mutual trust between the judiciary can be built in various ways. Firstly, through the creation of a unified European procedure in the form of additional tools held before the adjudication and based on the general rules of procedure. Secondly, through sectoral harmonisation of procedural law within the framework of solving individual issues in accordance with a step-by-step approach. Thirdly, it is necessary to create common standards, in the form of principles and rules, regulations and directives. The Author in this article analyses the main ways of creating uniformity of norms applied in the territory of the European Union, the most suitable for the institution of mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments. The process of legal development of the institution of mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments and its current status are considered.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Judicial decision; Law; Legal regulations

PL

Orzecznictwo sądu; Prawo; Regulacje prawne

• Czasopismo: Przegląd Europejski
• Rocznik: 2018
• Numer: nr 2
• Strony: 71--86

Twórcy

autor

Elena Maystrovich

• Rosyjski Uniwersytet Przyjaźni Narodów

autor

Elena Kucheryavaya

• Uniwersytet Warszawski

Bibliografia

• 1. CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL Rights of The European Union (2000), OJ, C 364/01.
• 2. CONSOLIDATED VERSION of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (2012), OJC 326/49, 26.10.2012.
• 3. CONVENTION for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocol no. 11 Rome, 4.11.1950.
• 4. COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No. 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, OJ L 012, 26.01.2001.
• 5. ERMAKOVA Elena P. (2014), Unifikatsiya grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo prava i mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava v Evropeĭskom Soiuze: uchebnoe posobie, Moskva.
• 6. ERMAKOVA Elena P., SITKAREVA Elena V. (2014), Unifikatsiya grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva v Evropeĭskom Soiuze v ramkah Stokgol'mskoĭ programmy 2010 g. (2010-2013 gg.), "Pravovaia initsiativa", no. 3.
• 7. GREEN PAPER (2011), The EU Corporate Governance Framework, Brussels, COM(2011) 164 final, 5.04.2011.
• 8. KALINICHENKO Paul, MIKHAĬLOVA Sofia (2014), Èvolûcyiâ norm i standartov ES v sfere priznaniâ i ispolneniâ resheniĭ po grazhdanskim delam, "Aktual'nye problemy prava Evropeĭskogo Soiuza", no. 1.
• 9. KASHKIN Sergeĭ, KALINICHENKO Paul, CHEGRINETS Egor, CHETVERIKOV Artem (2001), Hartiâ Evropeĭskogo Soiuza ob osnovnykh pravakh. Kommentarii, Moskva.
• 10. LITVINSKIĬ Dmitriĭ (06.01.2013), Mezhdu stranami ES èkzekvatury bol'she ne budet, "Zakon.ru".
• 11. MARTENS Fedor F. (1996), Sovremennoe mezhdunarodnoe pravo tsivilizovannykh narodov (po izd. 1904 g.), T. 1, Moskva.
• 12. REGULATION (EU) No. 1215/2012 of the European Parlament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast), OJ L 351/1, 12.12.2012.
• 13. SAKHNO Daria (20.02.2012), Lis Pendens v. Exclusive Choice of Court, "Zakon.ru", http://zakon.ru/Blogs/OneBlog/2139.
• 14. TREATY OF EUROPEAN UNION, Maastricht, 7.02.1992, WE 1992 C 191.
• 15. TREATY OF AMSTERDAM amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related acts - Final Act, OJ C 340, 10.11.1997.
• 16. SCHACK Haimo (2001), Mezhdunarodnoe grazhdanskoe protsessual'noe pravo, Moskva.
• 17. SHVAKIN Sergeĭ V. (2011), Mezhdunarodno-pravovaia unifikacyia norm prava v protsesse konvergentsii nacional'nykh pravovykh sistem, "Zakonnost' i pravoporiadok v sovremennom obshchestve", no. 7.
• 18. STORME Marcel (2010), Improving Access to Justice in Europe, "Teka Kom. Praw. OL PAN", http://www.pan-ol.lublin.pl/wydawnictwa/TPraw3/Storme.pdf.
• 19. TSIRAT Gennadiĭ (2013), Reforma protsedur priznaniâ i ispolneniâ sudebnykh reshenij po grazhdanskim i kommercheskim delam v Evropeĭskom soiuze, "Zakon i zhizn'", no. 8/3.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0013.0803