Philosophical Difficulties of Stakeholder Theory

• Autorzy: Maciej Soin
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Philosophical difficulties of stakeholder theory-which plays an important role in CSR and business ethics-are mainly connected to the questions of its status and justification. What sense does stakeholder theory have: descriptive, instrumental or normative? And if normative, why then should executives worry about multiple stakeholder demands? It is well known that Freeman, one of the most important authors of stakeholder theory, deliberately disregarded these problems. In philosophical questions, he invoked Rorty's pragmatism that in his opinion effectively undermined the "positivistic" dichotomy between facts and values, science and ethics, and enabled stakeholder theory to be understood as both descriptive and normative. The article presents some difficulties connected with this view, focusing on its dubious assumptions and unfavourable consequences. These assumptions contain a false dilemma, taken from Rorty, which states that knowledge follows either a rule of representation or a rule of solidarity. One of the unfavourable consequences is the conclusion that stakeholder theory may be true only if its followers are able to force the stakeholders to accept its truthfulness. The main thesis of the article says that, because of pragmatic justification, stakeholder theory became a sort of arbitrary narration, which is unable to deal with its (empirical) misuses. However, a more traditional view on facts and values enables us to appreciate the descriptive advantages of the theory and to identify difficulties connected with its normative layer. From this point of view, the attempt at a pragmatic interpretation of stakeholder theory was a misunderstanding that should be withdrawn from circulation. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Philosophy; Philosophy of economics; Value and ethical norms; Stakeholders

PL

Filozofia; Filozofia ekonomii; Wartości i normy etyczne; Interesariusze

• Czasopismo: Annales : etyka w życiu gospodarczym
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 21
• Numer: nr 7
• Strony: 75--84

Twórcy

autor

Maciej Soin

• Lodz University of Technology

Bibliografia

• Evan, W. M., & Freeman, R. E. (1997). Spółka i osoby żywotnie zainteresowane. Kapitalizm kantowski. In L. V. Ryan, & J. Sójka (Eds.), Etyka biznesu. Z klasyki współ-czesnej myśli amerykańskiej (E. Dratwa, Trans.). Poznań: Wydawnictwo "W drodze" [(1983). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capi-talism. In T. L. Beauchamp, & N. E. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business. New York: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs].
• Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J., Hicks, A., Parmar, B., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory. The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hare, R. M. (1952). The language of morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Höffe, O. (1995). Immanuel Kant. (A. M. Kaniowski, Trans.). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E., & Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 479-502.
• Rorty, R. (1996). Contingency, irony, and solidarity (W. J. Popowski, Trans.). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Spacja.
• Soin, M. (2008). W kwestii prawdy. Wittgenstein i filozofia analityczna. Warsaw: Wydaw-nictwo Instytutu Filozofii i Socjologii PAN.
• Soin, M. (2013). Wartość i fakt. Etyczne i socjologiczne zastosowania filozofii lingwistycz-nej. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Filozofii i Socjologii PAN.
• Soin, M. (2014). O sporze Poppera z Wittgensteinem. Przegląd Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria, 4, 125-138.
• Soin, M. (2016a). Deflacjonizm. In J. Hołówka, & B. Dziobkowski (Eds.), Panorama współczesnej filozofii. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Soin, M. (2016b). Filozoficzne trudności teorii interesariuszy. Annales. Ethics in Economic Life, 19(3), 7-16.
• Soin, M. (2016c). Interesariusze internetu. Prakseologia, 158(1), 213-240.
• Szahaj, A. (2002). Ironia i miłość. Neopragmatyzm Richarda Rorty'ego w kontekście sporu o postmodernizm. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
• Wicks, A. C., & Freeman, R. E. (1998). Organization Studies and the New Pragmatism: Positivism, Anti-positivism, and the Search for Ethics. Organization Science, 9(2), 123-140.
• Wittgenstein, L. (1972). Philosophical Investigations. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
• Wittgenstein, L. (2001). On Certainty. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo KR.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.18778/1899-2226.21.7.05