People's Evaluations of Income Inequality and the Gini Coefficient : Different in Details, Similar in Patterns

• Autorzy: Barbara Jancewicz
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Recent studies suggest that the Gini coefficient's and people's evaluations of income inequality differ. Thus, we risk adopting policies that decrease the coefficient but not the inequality people see. This article argues that the coefficient does reflect people's perception of inequality, at least in relation to the criticised Pigou-Dalton Transfer Principle stating that inequality falls whenever a person with higher income gives a small part of it to a person with lower income. Results from a questionnaire experiment where 105 WUT students evaluated inequality of different income distributions confirm that answers strictly following the principle are rare (around 3% of the sample). However, the average correlation between respondents' and Gini's evaluations was relatively high (0.693). Furthermore, when respondents' evaluations were averaged, the correlation jumped to 0.954. An MDS analysis confirms that while these evaluations differed in details, the pattern common to respondents' evaluations was in line with the Gini coefficient. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Income inequalities; Quality perception; Multidimensional scaling

PL

Nierówności dochodowe; Percepcja jakości; Skalowanie wielowymiarowe

• Czasopismo: Polish Sociological Review
• Rocznik: 2019
• Numer: nr 3 (207)
• Strony: 289--304

Twórcy

autor

Barbara Jancewicz

• University of Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• Amiel, Y. 1999. The Measurement of Income Inequality: The Subjective Approach, in: J. Silber (ed.), Handbook on Income Inequality Measurement. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Amiel, Y. and Cowell, F. A. 1992. Measurement of income inequality: experimental test by questionnaire, Journal of Public Economics 47: 3-26.
• Amiel, Y., Cowell, F. A. 1999. Thinking about Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Amiel, Y. and Cowell, F. A. 2002. Attitudes towards risk and inequality: a questionnaire-experimental approach, in: F. Andersson and H. J. Holm (eds.), Experimental Economics: Financial Markets, Auctions, and Decision Making. Dewenter: Kluwer, pp. 85-115.
• Amiel Y., Cowell, F. A. and Slottje, D. J. 2004. Why do people violate the transfer principle? evidence from educational sample surveys, Research on Economic Inequality 11: 16.
• Amiel, Y., Cowell, F. A. and Gaertner, W. 2012. Distributional orderings: an approach with seven flavours, Theory and Decision 73(3): 381-399.
• Atkinson, T. 1970. On the Measurement of Inequality, Journal of Economic Theory 2: 244-263.
• Ballano, C. and Ruiz-Castillo, J. 1993. Searching by questionnaire for the meaning of income inequality, Revista española de economía 10(2): 233-259.
• Borg, I. and Groenen, P. J. F. 2005. Modern Multidimensional Scaling. New York: Springer-Verlag.
• Brzeziński, M. 2013. Nierówności w Polsce na tle krajów Unii Europejskiej. Paper presented at the IX Congress of Polish Economists, Warsaw, 28-29 November, 2013. Retrieved from: http://coin.wne.uw.edu.pl/mbrzezinski/research/MB KEP 2013.pdf.
• Central StatisticalO ffice [GUS]. 2017. Household Budget Survey in 2016. Warsaw. Retrieved from: https://stat.gov.pl/files/gfx/portalinformacyjny/pl/defaultaktualnosci/5486/9/11/1/budzetygospodarstwdomowych w 2016.pdf.
• Chakravarty, S. R. 1999. Measuring Inequality: the Axiomatic Approach, in: J. Silber (ed.), Handbook of Income Inequality Measurement. Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands, pp. 163-186.
• Coulter, P. B. 1989. Measuring Inequality. A Methodological Handbook. Boulder: Westview Press.
• Cruces, G., Perez-Truglia, R. and Tetaz, M. 2013. Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment, Journal of Public Economics 98: 100-112.
• Gaertner, W. and Namazie, C. 2003. Income inequality, risk, and the transfer principle: a questionnaire experimental investigation. Mathematical Social Sciences 45(2): 229-245.
• Harrison, E. and Seidl, C. 1994. Perceptional inequality and preferential judgements: an empirical examination of distributional axioms, Public Choice 79(1-2): 61-81.
• Hauser, O. and Norton, M. 2017. (Mis)perceptions of inequality, Current Opinion in Psychology 18: 21-25.
• Jancewicz, B. 2014. Perception of income inequality: A multidimensional scaling study, in: J. Bishop, and J. G. Rodriguez (eds.), Research on Economic Inequality, Vol. 22-Economic Well-Being and Inequality: Papers from the Fifth ECINEQ Meeting, Emerald, pp. 251-272.
• Jancewicz, B. 2016a. Income inequalities: axioms and income inequality measures and people's perceptions, Decyzje 25: 21-42.
• Jancewicz, B. 2016b. Income inequality re-examined: constructing experimental tests by questionnaire, Myśl Ekonomiczna i Polityczna 53: 17-42.
• Kolm, S. C. 1999. The Rational Foundations of Income Inequality Measurement, in: J. Silber (ed.), Handbook on Income Inequality Measurement. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. London: Thomas Piketty.
• Sen, A. 1973. On Economic Inequality. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
• Traub S., Seidl, Ch. and Schmidt, U. 2009. An experimental study on individual choice, social welfare, and social preferences, European Economic Review 53(4): 385-400.
• Wilkinson, R. and Pickett, K. 2010. The Spirit Level: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger. Bloomsbery Press.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.26412/psr207.03