PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2019 | 12 | nr 3 | 109--121
Tytuł artykułu

Kaliningrad, the Suwalki Gap and Russia´s Ambitions in the Baltic Region

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The current study is motivated by the special role of the Kaliningrad region for both Russia and the NATO Alliance. The aim of the study is to analyse how likely is the outbreak of conflict in the Suwalki gap; which factors either hinder or support the escalation of the tensions between Russia and the Alliance in the region. Both the NATO Alliance and Russia have different advantages and disadvantages with respect to any future escalation in the Suwalki corridor and the Kaliningrad region. The main weakness of NATO is its reliance on public opinion, which limits its ability to counter Russian escalation. Conceptually, at least, the Alliance has much deeper pockets, although it is an entirely different matter whether the superiority of resources could be realized in practice. Russia enjoys a public affairs advantage in that it has few requirements to justify its military actions, which may allow it to outlast NATO in a conventional-force brinkmanship scenario despite having many fewer resources. However Baltic States as well European Union should keep in mind that additional force building and deterrence initiatives can lead to escalation and strategic confrontation with Russia, which would bring devastating social and economic consequences for region.(original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
12
Numer
Strony
109--121
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Baltic Defence College Estonia
  • Baltic Defence College Estonia
Bibliografia
  • Adamowicz, M., & Machla, A. (2016). Small and Medium Enterprises and the Support Policy of Local Government. Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(3), 405-437. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/OeC.2016.024
  • Altman, D. (2018). Advancing without Attacking: The Strategic Game around use of Force. Security Studies, 27(1), 58-88.
  • Andžāns, M., & Veebel, V. (2017). Deterrence Dilemma in Latvia and Estonia: Finding the Balance between External Military Solidarity and Territorial Defence. Journal on Baltic Security, 3(2), 29-42.
  • Atkinson, A.B., & Stiglitz, J.E. (1980). Lectures on Public Economics. London, McGraw Hill.
  • Ayyagari, M., Beck, T., & Demirguc-kunt, A. (2007). Small and medium enterprises across the globe. Small Business Economics, 29, 415-434. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3127
  • Barrie, D. (2016). Russia and anti-access/area-denial capabilities. International Institute for Strategic Studies, 08 February 2016. Available: http://www.iiss.org/en/militarybalanceblog/blogsections/2016-629e/february-f0ed/russia-and-anti-access-area-denial-capabilities-9b3e
  • Beck, T., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Martinez Peira, M.S. (2011). Bank financing for SMEs: evidence across countries and bank ownership types. Journal of Financial Services Research, 39, 35-54. doi: 10.1007/s10693-010-0085-4
  • Berger, A.N., & Udell, G.F. (2002). Small business credit availability and relationship lending: the importance of bank organizational structure. The Economic Journal, 112(477), 32-53. doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00682
  • Berger, A.N., Goldberg, L.G., & White, L.J. (2001a). The effects of dynamic changes in bank competition on the supply of small business credit. European Financial Review, 5, 115-139.
  • Berger, A.N., Klapper, L.F., & Udell, G.F. (2001b). The ability of banks to lend to informationally opaque small business. Journal of Banking and Finance, 25, 2127-2167. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4266(01)00189-3
  • Berger, A.N., Klapper, L.F., Martinez-Peria, M.S., & Zaidi. R. (2008). Bank ownership and banking Relationships. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 17, 37-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jfi.2006.11.001
  • Birkenbach, H.-M., & Wellmann, C. (eds)(2003). The Kaliningrad Challenge: Options and Recommendations. Kiel Peace Research Series. LIT Verlag Münster.
  • Chang, C., Liao, G., Yu, X., & Ni, Z. (2014). Information from lending relationship: evidence from loan defaults in China. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 46(6), 1225-1257.
  • Clark, W., Luik, J., Ramms, E., & Shirreff, R. (2016). Closing NATO's Baltic Gap, International Centre for Defence and Security. Tallinn 2016. R. Shirreff, War with Russia, Coronet Books, London 2016.
  • Clarke, G., Cull, R., Martinez Peria, M.S., & Sanchez, S.M. (2005). Bank lending to small business in Latin America: Does bank origin matter? Journal of Banking Money, Credit, and Banking, 37, 83-118.
  • D'Aurizio, L., Oliveiro, T., & Romano, L. (2015). Family firms, soft information and bank lending in a financial crisis. Journal of Corporate Finance, 33, 279-292. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.01.002
  • Detragiache, E., Tressel, T., & Gupta, P. (2006). Foreign banks in poor countries: Theory and evidence. IMF Working Paper No. 18. International Monetary Fund, Washington DC.
  • Dolezal, J., Snajdr, J., Belas, J., & Vincurova, Z. (2015). Model of the loan process in the context of unrealized income and loss prevention. Journal of International Studies, 8(1), 91-106. doi: 10.14254/2071-8330.2015/8-1/8
  • Dubravska, M., Mura, L., Kotulic, R., & Novotny, J. (2015). Internationalization of Entrepreneurship-Motivating Factors: Case Study of the Slovak Republic. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 12(5), 121-133.
  • Elak, L., & Šliwa, D. (2016). The Suwalki Gap - Nato's Fragile Hot Spot. Zeszyty Naukowe AON, 2 (103).
  • ERR (2016). Terras: Russia demonstrating wish to control Baltic Sea area. Eesti Rahvusringhääling, 07 October 2016, http://news.err.ee/v/news/2bd72ff4-396e-4e61-897a-d8bfe903e6c8/terras-russia-demonstrating-wish-to-control-baltic-sea-area
  • Fiserova, T., Teply, P., & Tripe, D. (2015). The performance of foreign-owned banks in the host country economics. Prague Economic Papers, 24(5), 1-24. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.527
  • Gormley, S., Kanatas, G., & Venezia, I. (2006). Bank competition in developing countries: does foreign bank entry improve credit access? Mimeo. MIT.
  • Grigas, A. (2016). NATO's Vulnerable Link in Europe: Poland's Suwalki Gap. Atlantic Council, 9 February 2016. http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/natosource/nato-s-vulnerable-link-in-europe-poland-s-suwalki-gap
  • Haynes, D. (2016). NATO has no plan if Russia invades, warns ex-general. The Times, 19.09.2016, http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/dh-nato-0nxssn0rr
  • Hodges, B. (2018). Don ̓t put US bases in Poland. Politico, 6 June 2018. https://www.politico.eu/article/dont-put-us-bases-in-poland/
  • IMF (2018). World Economic Outlook (April 2018). http://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDPD@WEO/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWORLD/RUS
  • Ivanauskas, V., Keršanskas, V., & Kasčiūnas, L. (2017). Kaliningrad Factor in Lithuanian - Russian Relations: Implications to the Security Issues of Lithuania. The Journal of Military Academy of Lithuania, 15(1), 119-149.
  • Jimenez, G., Salas, V., & Saurina, J. (2006). Determinants of collateral. Journal of Financial Economics, 81, 255-281. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.06.003
  • Johnson, D. (2017). ZAPAD 2017 and Euro-Atlantic security. NATO Review Magazine, 14 December 2017. https://www.nato.int/docu/review/2017/also-in-2017/zapad-2017-and-euro-atlantic-security-military-exercise-strategic-russia/EN/index.htm
  • Kljucnikov A., Belas, J., Kozubikova, L., & Pasekova P. (2016).The Entrepreneurial Perception of SME Business Environment Quality in the Czech Republic. Journal of Competitiveness, 8(1), 66-78.
  • Kojala, L., Keršanskas, V. (2016). (Un)convenient Kaliningrad and Kremlin's relationship. News portaal DELFI, 7 December 2016. https://en.delfi.lt/central-eastern-europe/unconvenient-kaliningrad-and-kremlins-relationship.d?id=73098334
  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silances, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). Government ownership of commercial banks. Journal of Finance, 57(1), 265-301. doi: 10.1111/1540-6261.00422
  • Menkhoff, L., Neuberger, D., & Rungruxsirivorn, O. (2012). Collateral and its substitutes in emerging markets lending. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36, 817-834.
  • Mian, A. (2003). Foreign, private domestic, and government banks: New evidence from emerging markets. University of Chicago, Mimeo.
  • Mian, A. (2006). Distance constraints: the limits of foreign lending in poor economics. Journal of Finance, 61(3), 1465-1505. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00878.x
  • NATO (2016). The Secretary General's Annual Report 2015, NATO Brussels 2016.
  • NATO (2017). Key NATO & Allied Exercises. https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2017_05/20170510_1705-factsheet_exercises_en.pdf
  • Nguyen, S., & Wolfee, S. (2016). Determinants of successful access to bank loans by Vietnamese SMEs: new evidence from the red river delta. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 21(1), 1-23.
  • Palet, L. S. (2014). Russia's strongest foothold in Europe: it's not the Ukraine. USA Today, 26 April 2014. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2014/04/26/ozy-russia-kaliningrad/8194403/
  • Praks, H. (2015). Hybrid or Not: Deterring and Defeating Russia's Ways of Warfare in the Baltics - the Case of Estonia. Research Paper No 124, NATO Defence College Rome December 2015.
  • Russian Federal Statistical Service, (2017) Statistical Data 2010-2017. http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/publications/catalog/doc_1138623506156
  • Shlapak, D. A., Johnson, M. W. (2016). Reinforcing Deterrence on NATO's Eastern Flank. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR1200/RR1253/RAND_RR1253.pdf
  • Sirutavičius, V., & Stanytė-Toločkienė, I. (2002). Strategic Importance of Kaliningrad Oblast of the Russian Federation. Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review, 1.
  • Śliwa, Z. (2013). Zapad 2013: The Russian Armed Forces Flexes its Muscles. Operational Environment Watch, Foreign Military Studies Office (FMSO), Fort Leavenworth 25 September 2013.
  • Śliwa, Z., Veebel, V., & Lebrun, M. (2018). Russian Ambitions and Hybrid Modes of Warfare. Estonian Journal of Military Studies, Vol. 2018, Issue 7.
  • Sukhankin, S. (2016).Kaliningrad: Russia's stagnant enclave. European Council of Foreign Relations, 31 March 2016. https://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_kaliningrad_russias_stagnant_enclave_6052
  • Veebel, V. (2015). Russian Propaganda, Disinformation, and Estonia's Experience. FPRI, 4 October 2015. https://www.fpri.org/article/2015/10/russian-propaganda-disinformation-and-estonias-experience/ Veebel, V. (2018). NATO options and dilemmas for deterring Russia in the Baltic States. Defence Studies, 18(2), 229-251.
  • Veebel, V. (2019). European Union as normative power in the Ukrainian-Russian conflict. International Politics, 56(5), 1-16.
  • Veebel, V., & Markus, R. (2018). The bust, the boom and the sanctions in trade relations with Russia. Journal of International Studies, 11(1), 9-20.
  • Veebel, V., & Ploom, I. (2018). The Deterrence Credibility of NATO and the Readiness of the Baltic States to Employ the Deterrence Instruments. Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review, 16(1), 171-200.
  • Williams, I, (2017). The Russia - NATO A2AD Environment. CSIS Missile Defence Project. https://missilethreat.csis.org/russia-nato-a2ad-environment/
  • Zemla, E., & Turecki, K. (2018). Poland offers US up to USD 2B for permanent military base. 25 May 2018. https://www.politico.eu/article/nato-poland-offers-us-up-to-2-billion-for-permanent-american-military-base/
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171567761

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.