PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2012 | nr 2 | 149--164
Tytuł artykułu

Environmental Aspects of the Process of Shaping the New Common Agricultural Policy

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Środowiskowe aspekty kształtowania nowej Wspólnej Polityki Rolnej
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The increasing importance of ecological and environmental protection policies, as well as the corresponding social preferences and action taken by non-governmental organizations, have contributed to the enhanced role of pro-ecological solutions implemented as a part of the European Union's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). However, on the basis of analysis of official EU documents and bills relating to the 2014-2020 CAP reform, it can be argued that the importance of the aforementioned factors has diminished compared to the reform bill originally proposed by the European Commission. This may be the result of the opposing stand taken by the European Parliament as a consequence of the special interests of those states with a relatively large share of agriculture in their economies and the influence of the food processing industry lobby. As a result, the scope and effectiveness of some instruments of substantial importance (specifically those implemented as a part of the second pillar of the CAP) will rely on internal policies exercised by individual Member States.(original abstract)
Rosnące znaczenie problemów ekologicznych i polityki ochrony środowiska, a także związanych z nimi preferencji społecznych i aktywności organizacji pozarządowych przyczyniły się do wzmocnienia proekologicznych rozwiązań w WPR. Na podstawie analizy oficjalnych dokumentów UE oraz projektów aktów dotyczących reformy tej polityki na lata 2014-2020 można jednak stwierdzić, że ich znaczenie zostało osłabione w stosunku do pierwotnego projektu reformy Komisji Europejskiej. Wpłynął na to opór Parlamentu Europejskiego, który w swoim stanowisku uwzględnił interesy krajów o relatywnie dużym znaczeniu rolnictwa w gospodarce oraz postulaty lobby przemysłu rolno-spożywczego. W rezultacie zakres i skuteczność zastosowania niektórych istotnych instrumentów (zwłaszcza w II filarze WPR), będzie zależeć od wewnętrznej polityki państw członkowskich.(abstrakt oryginalny)
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
149--164
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Wrocław University of Economics, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Alliance Environment (2007), Evaluation of environmental impact of the CMO and direct support measures of the CAP for arable crops. Brussels: Alliance Environment, Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development.
  • Birdlife International, European Environmental Bureau, European Forum on Nature Conservation and Pastoralism, International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements - EU Group, World Wildlife Fund for Nature (2010). Proposal for a new UE Common Agricultural Policy. Birdlife International. Available at: http://europe.birdlife.org. Accessed 19 January 2012.
  • Blandford, D.; Josling, T. (2007). Meeting Future WTO Commitments on Domestic Support. Washington D.C.: The German Marshall Fund of the United States.
  • Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development (2010). Rural Development in the European Union, Statistical and Economic Information. Report 2010. Brussels: European Union.
  • European Commission (2000). Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC (O. J. EC L, 327 z 22.12.2000).
  • European Commission (2008). CAP Health check - Impact assessment note no 9. Subject: New challenges. European Commission D(2008) BV/15336. Brussels.
  • European Commission (2010a). Europeans, Agriculture and the Common Agriculture Policy, Special barometer. Brussels: European Commission.
  • European Commission (2010b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and Committee of Regions. Europe 2020 A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels: European Commission COM(2010) 2020.
  • European Commission (2010c). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and Committee of Regions. The Cap towards 2020: Meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future. Brussels 18.11.2010. COM(2010) 672 final.
  • European Commission (2011a). Agricultural Policy Briefs, The future of rural development policy, Brief no 4. Brussels: European Commission, DG Agriculture and rural development.
  • European Commission (2011b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and Committee of Regions. A Budget for Europe 2020 - Part II: Policy fiches. Brussels. 29.6.2011 COM(2011) 500 final.
  • European Commission (2011c). Proposal for regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural development (EAFRD). Brussels 19.10.2011. COM(2011) 627 final.
  • European Parliament, Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (2011). Draft report, the CAP towards 2020: meeting the food, natural resources, and territorial challenges of the future. Brussels: European Parliament.
  • IFOAM (2010). EU finance 2014-2020 - Food and Farm related funds, EU must prioritise sustainability not stagnation. Press Release. Available at: http//www.ifoam-eu.org. Accessed 18 January 2012.
  • IFOAM EU Group (2010). Position Paper, CAP after 2013, Smart change or business as usual? IFOAM. Available at: http//www.ifoam-eu.org/positions/Papers/pdf/Position IFOAMEU CAP final 7.05.2010.pdf. Accessed 18 January 2012.
  • Nowicki, P. et al (2009). Scenar 2020 II - Apdate of Analysis of Prospects in the Scenar 2020 Study - Contract no 30 - CE - 0200286/00-21. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate- General Agriculture and Rural Development.
  • The Green 10. A group of leading environmental citizens organisations active at EU level (2008). Environment at the heart of Europe an environmental roadmap for 2009-2014 the role of the European Parliament. A joint document from the green 10. Amsterdam: Bankwatch Network, BirdLife International, Climate Action Network Europe (CAN), European Environmental Bureau (EEB), Friends of the Earth Europe, Friends of Nature International, Greenpeace European Unit, Health and Environment Alliance, European Federation for Transport and Environment (T&E), WWF European Policy Office.
  • Wilkin, J. (2011). Przyszłość Wspólnej Polityki Rolnej Unii Europejskiej - próba podsumowania dyskusji, Wieś i rolnictwo 1(150).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171568383

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.