The Discrimination Method for the Transformation Process of Results of Research Projects into Practical Applications

• Autorzy: Arkadiusz Manikowski
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the usage of discrimination tools in R&D activities especially in Innovative Programme. Based on these tools, in this paper is drawn up a method for project evaluation and their analysis. A case study has been adopted based on projects realized by ITeE-PBI in Radom within the PW-004 Multi-Year Programme. The main obtained results are following: selection of innovation project characteristics, evaluation of rank of project characteristics, prediction of launch data for a innovative solutions, sensitivity analysis. The presented results indicate that this mathematical tools can be very useful for innovation project analysis.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Innovative Projects; Innovative character; Research & Development (R+D)

PL

Projekty innowacyjne; Innowacyjność; Badania i rozwój (B+R)

• Czasopismo: Management and Production Engineering Review
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: 3
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 39--48

Twórcy

autor

Arkadiusz Manikowski

• Warsaw University

Bibliografia

• Smart Innovation: A Practical Guide to Evaluating Innovation Programmes, ECS-EC-EAEC BrusselsLuxembourg, 2006.
• Sharpe V., Sustainable Development OpportunitiesTarget Technologies National Summit on Innovation and Learning - Canada's Innovation Strategy, 2002.
• Chiesa V., Frattini F., Lazzarotti V., Manzini R., Troja T., An exploratory study on R&D performance measurement practices: A survey of Italia R&D Intensive Firms, Line Papers, n. 218, Serie Technologia, 14 luglio 2008.
• Ojanene V., Vuola O., Coping with the multiple dimensions of R&D performance analysis, International Journal of Technology Management, 33, 279-290, 2006.
• Chiesa V., Masella C., Searching for an effective measure of R&D performance, Management Decision, 37, 7, 49-57, 1996.
• Nixon B., Research and Development performance: a case study, Management Accounting Research, 9, 329-355, 1998.
• Economic Strategy of Government: Enterprise-Development-Labour, Warsaw 2002.
• Mazurkiewicz A. [Ed.], Technological Innovations for Sustainable Development, Institute for Sustainable Technologies- National Research Institute, Radom 2009.
• Manikowski A., Supporting of the transformation of scientific and research achievements into practical applications by using the quantitative methods, in: A. Jasiński [Ed.], Management of the transformation of scientific and research achievements into practical applications - within the multi-year programme, PW-004, Working Paper, Faculty of Management, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, 30.09.2008 pp. 209-239, (in Polish).
• Morrison D.F., Multivariate statistical methods, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1976.
• Griffin A., Page A.L., PDMA success measurement project: recommended measures for product development success and failure, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, 478-496, 1996.
• Dobosz M., Computer's supporting of statistical analysis of research results, EXIT, Warsaw 2001 (in Polish).
• Sipos G.L., Ciurea J.B., Evaluation method of the innovation project global efficiency, Robotic & Management, 12-2/2007, pp. 59-64.
• Alptekin E., Yalcinyigit D., Alptekin G., Evaluation of Risks in New Product Innovation, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 54, 1157-1161, 2009.
• Patalas-Maliszewska J., Krupa T., About of the multicriteria selection process of the decision support system, Fundations of Management, 2, 2010.
• Altman E., Predicting distress of companies: revisiting the z-score and zeta models, New York University, New York, 2000.
• Altman E., A Further Empirical Investigation of the Bankruptcy Cost Question, Journal of Finance, September 1984, pp. 1067-1089.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/v10270-012-0005-1