Using Sustainable Competitive Advantages to Measure Technological Opportunitie

• Autorzy: Josu Takala , Matti Muhos , Sara Tilabi , Mehmet Serif Tas , Bingli Yan
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The goal of this paper is to help small and medium size enterprises (SMEs) to find operative competitive advantage. This paper introduces a new method which applies critical factor analysis, risk and opportunities analysis to measure and propose resource allocation for companies in couple of next years. this research shows Knowledge/Technology (K/T) Calculation effect on (Balanced) Critical Factor Index (CFIs) depending on the proportions allocated among the different technological levels (Basic, Core or Spearhead) for each attribute separately. Moreover it helps firms to take balance in resource allocation for each attribute in changing environments on the basis of different level of technology. This paper presents the 'first in the world' case study on operative sustainable competitive advantage and corresponding risk levels by taking into account technology and knowledge effects for 7 SME companies. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Competitive advantage; Risk; Knowledge; Technology; Small business

PL

Przewaga konkurencyjna; Ryzyko; Wiedza; Technologia; Małe i średnie przedsiębiorstwa

• Czasopismo: Management and Production Engineering Review
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 4
• Numer: nr 3
• Strony: 55--64

Twórcy

autor

Josu Takala

• University of Vaasa, Finland

autor

Matti Muhos

• University of Oulu, Finland

autor

Sara Tilabi

• University of Vaasa, Finland

autor

Mehmet Serif Tas

• University of Vaasa, Finland

autor

Bingli Yan

• Wuhan University of Technology, Finland

Bibliografia

• Si, Takala and Liu (2010), Benchmarking and developing the operational competitiveness of Chinese state-owned manufacturing enterprises in a global context, J. Innovation and Learning, 7, 2, 2010.
• Porter Michael E., "Competitive Strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors", New York: Free Press, corp. 397p. ISBN 0-02925360-8, 1980.
• Barney Jay B., Zajac E.J., competitive organizational behavior towards an organizational based theory of competitive advantages, Strategic Managements Journal, 15, 5-9, 1994.
• Barney J.B., Wright M., Ketchen D.J. Jr., The resource-based view of the firm: ten years after 1991, Journal of Management, 27, 625-641, 2001.
• Quinn J.B., Strategies for Change, Logical Incrementalism, (The Irwin Series in Management and the Behavioral Sciences) ISBN 0256025436, 1980.
• Grant R.M., Contemporary strategy analysis, Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2005.
• Daft R.L., Organization theory and design, 2. ed. St. Paul: West publishing Co. 571p. ISBN0-314-931708, 1986.
• Daft R.L., Organization Theory and Design, Masson: Cengage Learning, 2009.
• Madu C.N., Aheto J., Kuei C., Winokur D., Adoption of strategic total quality management philosophies: multi-criteria decision analysis model, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 13, 3, 57-72, 1996.
• Takala J., Global Manufacturing Strategies Require "Dynamic Engineers? Case study in Finnish Industries, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107, 3, 326-344, 2007.
• Jay S. Kim, Peter Arnold, Operationalizing manufacturing strategy: An exploratory study of constructs and linkage, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16, 12, 45-73, 1996.
• Jeroen Kraaijenbrink J.-C. Spender, Aard J. Groen, The Resource-Based View: A Review and Assessment of Its Critiques, Journal of management, 36, 349, 2010.
• Braun E., Technology in Context. Technology Assessment for Managers, The Management of Technology and Innovation, Routledge, London, 1998.
• Wernerfelt B., A resource-based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180, 1984.
• Saaty T.L.,Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process, Int. J. Services Sciences, 1, 1, 83-98, 2008.
• Yang Liu, Wu Qian, Shi Zhao, Josu Takala, Operation strategy optimization based on developed sense and respond methodology, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Innovation & Management.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/mper-2013-0029