Confronting the International Order: Changes in US Foreign Policy from the Perspective of American Power Elites

• Autorzy: Andrzej Mania , Tomasz Pugacewicz
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this article is to present the most important voices on the role of the US in the international order during Donald Trump's presidency in the debate held in the Foreign Affairs. The authors assume that Foreign Affairs expresses the opinions of the most crucial organisation bringing together the elites of American foreign affairs - the Council on Foreign Relations. The paper proposes a hypothesis according to which there is a difference of opinion due to the adopted theoretical perspective regarding Trump's role in the destruction of the liberal international order among the American power elites, even though they agree that the ideological conflict between democratic and authoritarian countries around the world is escalating.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

International relations; Foreign policy; Power elite

PL

Stosunki międzynarodowe; Polityka zagraniczna; Elita władzy

• Czasopismo: International Studies : Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 23
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 11--31

Twórcy

autor

Andrzej Mania

• Jagiellonian University

autor

Tomasz Pugacewicz

• Jagiellonian University

Bibliografia

• 1. Abelson, D. Theoretical Models and Approaches to Understanding the Role of Lobbies and Think Tanks in US Foreign Policy. Policy Expertise in Contemporary Democracies. Ed. Stephen Brooks, Dorota Stasiak, and Tomasz Zyro. Burlington: Ashgate, 2012.
• 2. Abrams, E. Trump the Traditionalists. A Surprisingly Standard Foreign Policy, "Foreign Affairs", no. 96.4 (2017), pp. 10-16.
• 3. Allison, G. The Myth of the Liberal Order From Historical Accident to Conventional Wisdom, "Foreign Affairs", no. 97.4 (2018), pp. 124-133.
• 4. Annual Membership Dues. Council on Foreign Relations. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.cfr.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/CFRMemberDues-July2017.pdf.
• 5. Bacevich, A.J. Saving "America First". What Responsible Nationalism Looks Like, "Foreign Affairs", no. 96.5 (2017), pp. 57-67.
• 6. Biden, J.R. Building on Success, Opportunities for the Next Administration. "Foreign Affairs", no. 95.5 (2016), pp. 46-58.
• 7. Circulation. "Foreign Affairs". Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/circulation.
• 8. Cohen, E.A. The Big Stick: The Limits of Soft Power and the Necessity of Military Force. New York: Basic Books, 2016.
• 9. Cohen, E.A. Trump's Lucky Year. Why the Chaos Can't Last. "Foreign Affairs", no. 97.2 (2018), pp. 2-9.
• 10. Colgan, J.D. and Robert O. Keohane. The Liberal Order Is Rigged. Fix it Now or Watch It Wither. "Foreign Affairs", no. 96.3 (2017), pp. 36-44.
• 11. Delury, J. Trump and North Korea. Reviving the Art of the Deal. "Foreign Affairs", no. 96.2 (2017), pp. 46-51.
• 12. Deudney, D. and G.J.I. Liberal World. The Resilient Order. "Foreign Affairs", no. 97.4 (2018), pp. 16-24.
• 13. Feigenbaum, Evan A. China and the World. "Foreign Affairs", no. 96.1 (2017), pp. 33-40.
• 14. Foreign Affairs Again Ranked Most Influential of All Media by US Opinion-Leader Study. Council on Foreign Relations. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.cfr.org/news-releases/foreign-affairs-again-ranked-most-influential-all-media-us-opinion-leader-study
• 15. Funding. Council on Foreign Relations. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.cfr.org/who-we-are/funding.
• 16. Grose, P. Continuing the Inquiry: The Council on Foreign Relations from 1921 to 1996. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press, 1996.
• 17. Haass, R.N. A World in Disarray: America Foreign Policy and the Crisis of the Old Order. New York: Penguin Press, 2017b.
• 18. Haass, R.N. Where to Go From Here. Rebooting American Foreign Policy. "Foreign Affairs", no. 96.4 (2017c), pp. 2-9;
• 19. Haass, R.N. World Order 2.0. "Foreign Affairs", no. 96.1 (2017a), pp. 2-9.
• 20. History. "Foreign Affairs". Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/history.
• 21. Ikenberry, G.J. The Plot Against American Foreign Policy. Can the Liberal Order Survive. "Foreign Affairs", no. 96.3 (2017), pp. 2-9.
• 22. Individual Membership. Council on Foreign Relations. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.cfr.org/membership/individual-membership.
• 23. James M. Lindsay. Council on Foreign Relations. Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://www.cfr.org/experts/james-m-lindsay.
• 24. Kotkin, S. Realist World. The Players Change, but the Game Remains. "Foreign Affairs", no. 97.4 (2018), pp. 10-15.
• 25. Kroenig, M. The Case for Trump's Foreign Policy. The Right People, the Right Positions. "Foreign Affairs", no. 96.3 (2017), pp. 30-34.
• 26. Lieber, R.J. Retreat and Its Consequences: American Foreign Policy and the Problem of World Order. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
• 27. Lind, J. Asia's Other Revisionist Power. Why US Grand Strategy Unnerves China. "Foreign Affairs", no. 96.2 (2017), pp. 74-82.
• 28. List the four journals that publish articles with the greatest influence on the way IR scholars think about international relations. TRIP Faculty Survey All Countries Combined (Sep. 9, 2014). Web. 14 Sep 2018, https://trip.wm.edu/charts/

Identyfikatory

DOI

11089/29701