Ontologia i epistemologia w badaniach polityki zagranicznej państwa

• Autorzy: Edward Haliżak

Warianty tytułu

Ontology and Epistemology in Foreign Policy Analysis

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Celem artykułu jest identyfikacja obszaru i granic subdyscypliny nauki o stosunkach narodowych - badania polityki zagranicznej. W artykule posługujemy się pojęciem "badanie polityki zagranicznej" zamiast powszechnie stosowanego "analiza polityki zagranicznej", ponieważ implikuje to stosowanie naukowych procedur badawczych. W związku z tym w artykule rozpatrzono następujące kwestie: historiografię badania polityki zagranicznej, począwszy od zakończenia I wojny światowej do chwili obecnej; założenia ontologiczne, za pomocą których wyznaczono obszar badawczy; epistemologię badań polityki zagranicznej. W podsumowaniu odniesiono się do badania polityki zagranicznej jako dyscypliny nauk społecznych. Biorąc pod uwagę kryteria ontologiczne, stwierdzić wypada, że obszar badawczy polityki zagranicznej jest węższy od dziedziny stosunków międzynarodowych. Dostrzeżemy jednak ich wzajemne powiązanie, jeśli odwołamy się do modelu podmiot-struktura. Obydwa obszary analizujemy za pomocą tych samych teorii, ale w każdym przypadku inaczej formułowane są pytania badawcze.(abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The aim of the article is to identify the scope and boundaries of the 'foreign policy research' sub-discipline. The term used in this article is 'foreign policy research' instead of the commonly applied 'foreign policy analysis' (analiza polityki zagranicznej) because this implies the application of scientific research procedures. Therefore, the article focuses on the following issues: the historiography of foreign policy research from the end of World War I to the present time; the ontological premises that were used to delimit the scope of research; the epistemology of foreign policy research. The conclusion addresses the concept of 'foreign policy research' as a sub-discipline of international relations. Taking into account the ontological criteria, the scope of foreign policy research is narrower than that of international relations. They are, however, interrelated, if we refer to the subject-structure criterion. The two areas are studied using the same theories, but research questions are formulated differently in each case.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Polityka zagraniczna; Stosunki międzynarodowe; Ontologia

EN

Foreign policy; International relations; Ontology

• Czasopismo: Stosunki Międzynarodowe
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 51
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 9--36

Twórcy

autor

Edward Haliżak

• Uniwersytet Warszawski

Bibliografia

• M.S. Anderson, The Rise of Modern Diplomacy 1450-1919, Longman, New York 1993
• K. Hamilton, R. Langhorne, The Practice of Diplomacy: Its Evolution, Theory and Administration, Routledge, New York 1995.
• P.B. Potter, Research in international relations, "American Political Science Review" 1930, nr 1, s. 52-69; P. Grose, Continuing the Inquiry: The Council on Foreign Relations from 1921 to 1996, Council on Foreign Relations Press, Washington 1996.
• P.B. Potter, Political science in the international field, "The American Political Science Review" 1923, nr 3, s. 381-391.
• Q. Wright, An analytical approach to the subject of world politics in teaching and research, "The American Political Science Review" 1927, nr 2, s. 396-399,
• B. Williams, State morality in international relations, "The American Political Science Review" 1923, nr 1, s. 17-33.
• L. Shoup, W. Minter, Imperial Brain Trust: The Council on Foreign Relations and United States Foreign Policy, Monthly Review Press, New York 1977.
• W. Lippmann, US Foreign Policy: Shield of the Republic, Little Brown, Boston 1943
• T. Bailey, The Man in the Street: The Impact of American Public Opinion on Foreign Policy, Macmillan, New York 1948;
• G. Almond, The American People and Foreign Policy, Harcourt, New York 1950.
• N. Spykman, A.A. Rollins, Geographic objectives in foreign policy, "The American Political Science Review" 1939, nr 3, s. 391.
• N. Spykman, Geography and foreign policy I, "The American Political Science Review" 1938, nr 1, s. 29.
• C.J. Friedrich, Foreign Policy in the Making, Norton & Co., New York 1938
• K. London, How Foreign Policy is Made, D. Van Nostrand, New York 1949.
• R. Snyder, H.W. Bruck, B. Sapin¸ Decision-Making as an Approach to the Study of International Politics, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1954.
• H. Sprout, M. Sprout, Man-Milieu Relationship Hypotheses in the Context of International Politics, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1956
• H. Sprout, M. Sprout, Environmental factors in the study of international politics, "Journal of Conflict Resolution" 1957, nr 1, s. 309-328.
• G. Almond, Comparative political system, "Journal of Politics" 1956, t. 18, s. 391-409.
• R. Snyder, H.W. Bruck, B. Sapin , Foreign Policy Decision-Making: An Approach to the Study of International Politics, Free Press, Glencoe 1963.
• R. Snyder, H.W. Bruck, B. Sapin , Foreign Policy Decision-Making (Revisited), Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke 2002.
• J. Frankel, Towards a decision-making model in foreign policy, "Political Studies" 1959, t. 7, s. 1-11;
• J. Frankel, The Making of Foreign Policy: An Analysis of Decision-Making, Oxford University Press, London 1963.
• J. Frankel, International Relations in a Changing World, Oxford University Press, London 1979, s. 74.
• G. Modelski, A Theory of Foreign Policy, Praeger, New York 1962, s. 9-10
• J. Rosenau (red.), International Politics and Foreign Policy, Free Press of Glencoe, New York 1961.
• J. Rosenau Foreign policy as an issue area, w: J. Rosenau (red.), Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy, Free Press, New York 1967, s. 11-51.
• J. Rosenau ( Toward the study of national-international linkages, w: J. Rosenau (red.), Linkage Politics: Essays on a Convergence of National and International System, Free Press, New York 1969, s. 45.
• J. Rosenau (Introduction: Political science in a shrinking world, w: J. Rosenau (red.), Linkage Politics: Essays on a Convergence of National and International System, Free Press, New York 1969., s. 9-17.
• J. Rosenau , Pre-theories and theories of foreign policy, w: R. Farrell (red.), Approaches to Comparative and International Politics, Northwestern University Press, Evanston 1966, s. 27-92.
• J. Rosenau (red.), Comparing Foreign Policies: Theories, Findings and Methods, John Wiley, New York 1974.
• J. Rosenau , Ph. Burgess, Ch. Herman, The adaptation of foreign policy research: A case study of an anti-case study project, "International Studies Quarterly" 1973, nr 1, s. 119-144.
• J. Rosenau, Puzzlement in foreign policy, "Jerusalem Journal of International Relations" 1976, nr 1, s. 1-2.
• V. Hudson, Ch. Vore, Foreign policy analysis yesterday, today, and tomorrow, "Mershon International Studies Review" 1995, nr 2, s. 209-238.
• A. Wendt, The agent structure problem in international relations theory, "International Organization" 1987, nr 2, s. 335-370
• A. Wendt, Levels of analysis versus agents and structures, "Review of International Studies" 1992, t. 18, s. 181-185.
• W. Carlsnaes, The agency-structure problem in foreign policy analysis, "International Studies Quarterly" 1992, nr 3, s. 245-270.
• R. Doty, Aporia: A critical exploration of the agent-structure problematique in international relations theory, "European Journal of International Relations" 1997, nr 3, s. 365-392
• H. Suganami, Agents, structures, narratives, "European Journal of International Relations" 1999, nr 5, s. 365-386.
• A. Wendt, Driving with the rearview mirror: On the rational science of institutional design, "International Organization" 2001, nr 4, s. 1021-1051
• Ch. Reus-Smith¸ The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1999.
• J. Gaddis, International relations theory and the end of the Cold War, "International Security"1992/1993, nr 3, s. 5-58.
• J. Goldstein, R. Keohane (red.)¸ Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change, Cornell University Press, Ithaca-London 1993, s. 3-31.
• A. Mintz, The decision to attack Iraq: A noncompensatory theory of decision making, "Journal of Conflict Resolution" 1993, t. 37, s. 595-618
• A. Mintz, N. Geva, The poliheuristic theory of foreign policy decision making, w: Decisionmaking on War and Peace: The Cognitive-Rational Debate, Lynne Rienner, Boulder 1997, s. 81-101
• A. Mintz (red.)¸ Integrating Cognitive and Rational Theories of Foreign Policy Decision Making, Palgrave Macmillan, New York 2003
• A. Mintz, How do leaders make decisions? A poliheuristic perspective, "Journal of Conflict Resolution" 2004, t. 48, s. 3-13.
• C. Hay, Political Analysis, Palgrave, Basingstoke 2004, s. 63.
• T. Łoś-Nowak, Stosunki międzynarodowe - teorie, systemy, uczestnicy, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław 2000, s. 185-230.
• W. Kostecki, Poziomy analizy polityki zagranicznej, w: E. Haliżak, M. Pietraś (red.), Poziomy analizy stosunków międzynarodowych, t. 1-2, Wydawnictwo Rambler, Warszawa 2013, s. 113-129.
• T. Ben, T. Christiansen, Rethinking European Union Foreign Policy, Manchester University Press, Manchester 2004.
• B. Surmacz, Dyplomacja organizacji pozarządowych, "Stosunki Międzynarodowe - International Relations" 2014, nr 1, s. 51-70
• B. Surmacz, Ewolucja współczesnej dyplomacji. Aktorzy-struktury-funkcje, Wydawnictwo UMCS, Lublin 2015.
• P. Cardwell, Ell External Relations Law and Policy in the Post-Lisbon Era, TMC - Asser Press, The Hague 2013
• J. Starzyk-Sulejewska, Stosunki Unii Europejskiej z Organizacją Narodów Zjednoczonych. Podstawy prawne i instytucjonalne oraz wybrane dziedziny współpracy, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa 2015.
• V. Hudson, Foreign policy analysis: Actor-specific theory and the ground of international relations, "Foreign Policy Analysis" 2005, nr 1, s. 2-3.
• V. Hudson, Foreign Policy Analysis. Classic and Contemporary Theory, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham 2014, s. 7.
• R. Cottam, Foreign Policy Motivation a General Theory and a Case Study, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh 1977
• G. Alons, Predicting a state's foreign policy: State preferences between domestic and international constraints, "Foreign Policy Analysis" 2007, nr 2, s. 211-232.
• J. Viner, Power versus plenty as objectives of foreign policy in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, "World Politics" 1948, nr 1, s. 1-29.
• S. Strange, International economics and international relations: A case of mutual neglect, "International Affairs" 1970, nr 2, s. 304-315
• P. Katzenstein, Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison 1978
• R. Cooper, Trade policy is foreign policy, "Foreign Policy" 1972-1973, nr 9, s. 18-36.
• E. Haliżak, Obszar badawczy nauki o stosunkach międzynarodowych, "Stosunki Międzynarodowe- International Relations" 2015, nr 2, s. 9-37.
• E. Haliżak D. Popławski (red.), Demokracja w stosunkach międzynarodowych, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa 1997.
• A. Lupovici, Me and the other in international relations. An alternative pluralist international relations 101, "International Studies Perspective" 2013, nr 4, s. 235-254.
• E. Haliżak (red.), Polityka zagraniczna i wewnętrzna państwa w procesie integracji europejskiej, Oficyna Wydawnicza Branta, Bydgoszcz 2004.
• H. Sprout, M. Sprout, The Ecological Perspective in Human Affairs, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1965
• E. Brighi, Ch. Hill, Implementation and behaviour, w: S. Smith, A. Hadfield, T. Dunne (red.), Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012, s. 147-167.
• R. Walker, Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1993.
• W. Carlsnaes, Foreign policy, w: idem, T. Risse, B. Simmons (red.), Handbook of International Relations, Sage, London 2010, s. 331.
• O. Waever, The sociology of a not so international discipline: American and European developments in international relations, "International Organization" 1998, t. 52, s. 687-727.
• Y. Vertzberger, The World in Their Minds: Information Processing, Cognition and Perception in Foreign Policy Decision Making, Stanford University Press, Stanford 1990.
• A. Wendt, The agent - structure problem in international relations, "International Organization" 1987, t. 41, s. 335-370.
• J. Elster, Book reviews - rational choice history: A case of excessive ambition, "American Political Science Review" 1994, nr 3, s. 696-702.
• Ch. Hill, The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke 2003.
• D. Baldwin, Economic Statecraft, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1985
• J. Nye, Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, Public Affairs Books, New York 2004;
• J. Nye,, The Powers to Lead, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008.
• R. Rosecrance, Action and Reaction in World Politics: International Systems in Perspective, Little Brown, Boston 1963.
• P. Wilson, The myth of the "first great debate", "Review of International Studies" 1998, nr 24, s. 1-16
• Y. Lapid, The third debate: On the prospects of international theory in a post-positivist era, "International Studies Quarterly" 1989, nr 33, s. 235-254.
• B. Most, H. Starr, International relations theory, foreign policy, substitutability, and "nice" laws, "World Politics" 1984, nr 3, s. 383-406.
• A. Wendt, Społeczna teoria stosunków międzynarodowych, tłum. W. Derczyński, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa 2008, s. 19.
• H. Mouritzen, A. Wivel, Explaining Foreign Policy. International Diplomacy and the Russo-Georgian War, Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder 2012.
• C. Wight, L. Hansen, T. Dunne, The end of international relations theory?, "European Journal of International Relations" 2013, t. 19, nr 3, s. 405-425.
• D. Geller, P. Diehl, The forum: Reflections and reassessments on the early work and ideas of David Singer, "International Studies Review" 2013, nr 15, s. 259-284.
• D. Singer, The level of analysis problem in international relations, "World Politics" 1961, nr 14, s. 77-92.
• V. Kubalkova (red.), Foreign Policy in a Constructed World, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk 2001.
• F. Sondermann, The linkage between foreign policy and international politics, w: J. Rosenau (red International Politics and Foreign Policy, Free Press of Glencoe, New York 1961., s. 8-17.
• H. Morgenthau, Truth and Power: Essays of a Decade, Pall Mall Press, London 1970, s. 251-257.
• W. Lippmann, Essays in the Public Philosophy, Little Brown, Boston 1955.
• S. Verba, Public opinion and the war in Vietnam, "American Political Science Review" 1967, nr 2, s. 317-333.
• W. Miller, D. Stokes, Constituency influence in congress, "American Political Science Review" 1963, nr 1, s. 45-56.
• J.M. Lindsay, The new apathy: How an uninterested public is reshaping foreign policy, "Foreign Affairs" 2000, nr 5, s. 2-8.
• J. Aldrich, J. Sullivan, E. Borgida, Foreign affairs and issue voting: Do presidential candidates waltz before a blind audience, "American Political Science Review" 1989, nr 1, s. 123-141.
• B. Page, R. Shapiro, Effects of public opinion on policy, "American Political Science Review" 1983, nr 1, s. 175-190.
• E. Wittkopf, Faces of Internationalism: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy, Duke University Press, Durham 1990
• O. Holsti, J. Rosenau, The structure of foreign policy attitudes among American leaders, "Journal of Politics" 1990, nr 1, s. 94-12
• O. Holsti, J. Rosenau, The structure of foreign policy beliefs among American opinion leaders - after the Cold War, "Millenium - Journal of International Studies" 1993, nr 3, s. 235-278.
• R. Rogowski, Commerce and Coalitions, Princeton University Press, Princeton-New Jersey 1989;
• E. Mansfield, Power, Trade, and War, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1984.
• R. Gilpin, US Power and Multinational Corporation, Basic Books, New York 1975
• L. Pauly, Capital mobility, state autonomy, and political legitimacy, "Journal of International Affairs" 1995, nr 2, s. 369-388.
• G. Allison, Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Little Brown, Boston 1971.
• G. Allison, Ph. Zelikow, Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Longman, New York 1999.
• M. Hermann, Ch. Hermann, Who makes foreign policy decision and how: An empirical inquiry, "International Studies Quarterly" 1989, nr 33, s. 361-387.
• R. Dacey, L. Carlson, Traditional decision analysis and the poliheuristic theory of foreign policy decision making, "Journal of Conflict Resolution" 2004, nr 1, s. 38-55.
• P. James, E. Zhang, Chinese choices: A poliheuristic analysis of foreign policy crises, 1950-1996, "Foreign Policy Analysis" 2005, nr 1, s. 31-54.
• A. Dudek, System decyzyjny w polityce zagranicznej Polski okresu tranzycji (1989-1992). Mechanizmy, procedury i instytucje, praktyka, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław 2012.
• H. Milner, Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1997.
• K. Holsti, National role conceptions in the study of foreign policy, "International Studies Quarterly" 1970, nr 3, s. 233-309.
• D. Kabat-Rudnicka, Z. Rudnicki, Teoria ról międzynarodowych jako instrument analityczny w studiach nad polityką zagraniczną, "Polski Przegląd Stosunków Międzynarodowych" 2011, nr 1, s. 7-26.
• S. Walker, Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis, Duke University Press, Durham 1987.
• K. Brummer, C. Thies, The contested selection of national role conceptions, "Foreign Policy Analysis" 2015, nr 11, s. 273-293.
• P.T. Jackson, D. Nexon, International theory in a post-paradigmatic era: From substantive wagers to scientific ontologies, "European Journal of International Relations" 2013, nr 3, s. 548-549.
• K. Waltz, International politics is not foreign policy, "Security Studies" 1996, nr 6, s. 54-57.
• C. Elman, Horses for courses: Why not neorealist theories of foreign policy?, "Security Studies" 1996, nr 6, s. 7-53.
• T. Christensen, J. Snyder, Chain gangs and passed bucks: Predicting alliance patterns in multipolarity, "International Organization" 1990, nr 2, s. 137-168
• S. Walt, Testing Theories of Alliance Formation: The case of Southeast Asia, "International Organization" 1988, nr 2, s. 275-316.
• H. Morgenthau, Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, Knopf, New York 1954, s. 18.
• K. Waltz, Theory of International Politics, Addison Wesley, Reading 1979.
• J. Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, W.W. Norton, New York 2001.
• E. Haliżak, Liberalna wizja porządku międzynarodowego, w: R. Kuźniar (red.), Porządek międzynarodowy u progu XXI wieku. Wizje, koncepcje, paradygmaty, Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa 2005, s. 59-84.
• B. Henning, V. Rittberger, W. Wagner, Constructivist foreign policy theory, w: V. Rittberger (red.), German Foreign Policy since Unification: Theories and Case Studies, Manchester University Press, Manchester 2001, s. 102-135.
• A. Wendt, Constructing international politics, w: M. Brown, O. Cote, S.L. Jones, S. Miller (red.), Theories of War and Peace, MIT Press, Cambridge 2001, s. 418-440.
• G. Rose, Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy, "World Politics" 1998, nr 51, s. 144-172;
• S. Lobell, N. Ripsman, J. Taliaferro (red.), Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2009.
• C. Thies, M. Breuning, Integrating foreign policy analysis and international relations through role theory, "Foreign Policy Analysis" 2012, nr 8, s. 1-4.
• S. Walker, A. Malicii, M. Schafer (red.), Rethinking Foreign Policy Analysis: States, Leaders and the Microfoundations of Behavioural International Relations, Routledge, New York 2012.