Product Family Manufacturing Based on Dynamic Classification
According to requirements of the market a great number of small companies are forced to offer a wide variety of products and to frequently respond to the market with customized so- lutions. At the same time, the fast delivery of products is often key to winning orders. Recent developments in Information Technology have made product family manufacturing available for small companies. It is made possible by applying a class of software tools called product configurators which can be integrated with Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems. This paper presents production management based on dynamic classification. High-variety production like mass customization is facing the challenge of effective variety management, which needs to deal with numerous variants of both product and process in order to ac- commodate diverse customer requirements. In high-variety production, in spite of applying modern management techniques, setup time still plays an important part in the production cycle time. The problem is not single change over time, but is in the quantity of changeovers required. This observation inspired the author to prepare a method of setup time reduction through the appropriate arrangement of tasks in the operational production plan. The ap- propriate arrangement of tasks means considering the similarity of parts from the point of view of operation carried out. The similarity of parts facilitates setup time reduction, which translates into smaller lot sizes, reduced in-process inventories, shorter lead time and higher throughput. The presented method is one of the elements of a computer aided management system for high-variety production. The method was validated in the conditions of best practice for unit and small batch production.(original abstract)
- Banaszak Z., Skołud B., Zaremba M., Computer supported production flow prototyping for virtual enterprises, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 14, 1, 83-106, 2003.
- Skołud B., Operational Management. Production in Small and Medium Enterprises, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, Gliwice, 2006.
- Matuszek J., Methods and Techniques in the Management of Production Engineering, Wydawnictwo Akademii Techniczno-Humanistycznej w Bielsku- Białej, Bielsko-Biała, 2007.
- Matuszek J., Kosturiak J., Gregor M., Chal J., Kristak J., Lean company, Wydawnictwo ATH, Bielsko-Biała, 2003.
- Kumar A., Gattoufi S., Reisman A., Mass customization research: trends, directions, diffusion intensity, and taxonomic frameworks, International Journal Flexibly Manufacturing Systems, 19, 637- 665, 2007.
- Goldratt E., Cox J., The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement, Werbel, Warszawa, 2002.
- Davies J., Mabin V. J., Balderstone S. J., The theory of constraints: a methodology apart? a comparisonwith selected OR/MS methodologies, The International Journal of Management Science Omega 33, 506-524, 2005.
- Houtzeel A., Group Technology, Maynard's Industrial Engineering Handbook (5th Edition), Edited by: Zandin, Kjell B, McGraw-Hill, 2001.
- Ben-Arieh D., Analysis of a distributed group technology methodology, Computers Industry Engineering, 35, 69-72, 1998.
- Everitt B., Cluster analysis, London, Arnold, 1993.
- Tan P., Steinbach M., Kumar V., Introduction to Data Mining, Addison-Wesley, 2006.
- Adenso-Diaz B., Lozano S., Eguia I., Part-machine grouping using weighted similarity coefficients, Computers & Industrial Engineering 48, 553-570, 2005.
- Jeon G., Broering M., Leep H.R., Parsaei H.R., Wong J.P., Part family formation based on alternative routes during machine failure, Computers Industry Engineering, 35, 73-76, 1998.
- Kulkarni U. R., Kiang Y. M., Dynamic grouping of parts in flexible manufacturing systems - A self-organizing neutral networks approach, European Journal of Operational Research 84, 192-212, 1995.
- Owsiński J. W., Machine-part grouping and cluster analysis: similarities, distances and grouping criteria, Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Science, Technical Sciences 57, 3, 217-228, 2009.
- Huffman C., Kahn, B., Variety for sale: Mass customization or mass confusion, Journal of Retailing, 74, 491-513, 1998.
- Bozarth C., McDermott C. M., Configurations in manufacturing strategy: A review and directions for future research, Journal of Operations Management 16, 427-439, 1998.
- Lamothe J., Hadj-Hamou K., AldanondoM., An optimization model for selecting a product family and designing its supply chain, European Journal of Operational Research 169, 1030-1047, 2006.
- Sinnema M., Deelstra S., Classifying variability modeling techniques, Information and Software Technology 49, 717-739, 2007.
- Elgh F. Supporting management and maintenance of manufacturing knowledge in design automation systems, Advanced Engineering Informatics 22, 445-456, 2008.
- Da Silveira G., Borenstein D., Fogliatto F. S., Mass customization: Literature review and research directions, Int. J. Production Economics 72, 1-13, 2001.
- Duray R., Mass customization origins: mass or custom manufacturing?, International Journal of Oper- ations & Production Management 3, 314-328, 2002.
- Pine B, J., Mass Customization Production and Services, Planning Review, 6-55, July-August 1993.
- MacCarthy B., Brabazon P.G., Bramham J., Fundamental modes of operation for mass customization, Int. J. Production Economics 85, 289-304, 2003.
- Salvador F., de Holen P. B., Piler F., Cracking the Code of Mass Customization, MITSloanMangement Review 50, 3, 71-79, 2009.
- Zipkin P., The limits of mass customization, MIT Sloan Management Review, 81-87, Spring 2001.
- Jiao J., Tseng M. M., Ma Q., Zou Y., Generic bill of materials and operations for high-variety production management, Concurrent Engineering: Re- search and Application 8, 4, 297-322, 2000.
- Jiao J., Simpson T. W., Siddique Z. J., Product family design and platform-based product development: a state-of-the-art review, Intell. Manuf. 18, 5-29, 2007.
- Gregor M., Skorik P., Simulation and emulation of manufacturing systems behavior, Management and Production Engineering Review, 1, 2, 11-21, 2010.