Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2019 | z. 135 Contemporary Management | 191--206
Tytuł artykułu

Networking and the Competitive Advantage of Supply Chains

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
The paper seeks to elaborate on the competitive advantage of supply chains from the perspective of networking that is employed in a twofold sense. First, it is used to explore the issue of network competitive advantage, which is considered to deliver benefits to all major actors constituting the supply chains, while in the second sense networking is brought to demonstrate whether actors, as well as relationships formed by these actors, possess the necessary characteristics to deliver the network competitive advantage. Based on this conceptual reasoning, we then deliver theoretical propositions that assist in deeper understanding of how the network characteristics of supply chains can contribute to deriving the network competitive advantage of supply chains. Specifically, the study shows that most of these characteristics have a positive impact on the value of network rent. Likewise, the paper also points out that the specific characteristics of networking are mutually interdependent and remain in intermeshing and overlapping relationships. As a consequence, the independent variables, when considered holistically, may mutually interact in such a way that they may produce contradictory outcomes.(original abstract)
  • University of Economics in Katowice, Poland
  • 1. Acs, Z.J., and Audretsch, D.B. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: an empirical analysis. The American Economic Review, 78(4), 678-690.
  • 2. Ahuja, G., Polidoro, Jr, F., and Mitchell, W. (2009). Structural homophily or social asymmetry? The formation of alliances by poorly embedded firms. Strategic Management Journal, 30(9), 941-958.
  • 3. Baum, J.A.C., Calabrese, T., and Silverman, B.S. (2000). Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 267-294.
  • 4. Becerra, M., Lunnan, R., and Huemer, L. (2008). Trustworthiness, risk, and the transfer of tacit and explicit knowledge between alliance partners. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 675-698.
  • 5. Bellamy, M.A., and Basole, R.C. (2013). Network analysis of supply chain systems: A systematic review and future research. System Engineering, 16, 235-249.
  • 6. Bercovitz, J., Jap, S.D., and Nickerson, J.A. (2006). The antecedents and performance implications of cooperative exchange norms. Organization Science, 17, 724-740.
  • 7. Bohlmann, J., Calantone, R., and Zhao, M. (2010). The Effects of Market Network Heterogeneity on Innovation Diffusion: An Agent-Based Modeling Approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 741-760.
  • 8. Borgatti, S.P., and Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432-445.
  • 9. Bowersox, D.J., Closs, D.J., and Stank, T.P. (2003). How to master cross-enterprise collaboration. Supply Chain Management Review, 7(4), 18-26.
  • 10. Burt, R.S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345-423.
  • 11. Burt, R.S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 349-399.
  • 12. Capaldo, A. (2007). Network structure and innovation: the leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 585-608.
  • 13. Choi, T., and Kim, Y. (2008). Structural embeddedness and supplier management: A network perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44(4), 5-13.
  • 14. Christopher, M. (1996). Networks and logistics: managing supply chain relationships. Asia-Australia Marketing Journal, 4(1), 19-24.
  • 15. Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & Supply Chain Management. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited 5th edition.
  • 16. Cohen, S., Roussel, J. (2005). Supply Chain Management. The Five Disciplines For Top Performance. NY: Mcgraw-Hill.
  • 17. Coombs, R., and Metcalfe, J.S. (2000). Organizing for innovation: co-ordinating distributed innovation capabilities, in N. Foss (ed.), Competence, Governance and Entrepreneurship (pp. 209-31).Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 18. Cox, A. (1996). Relational competence and strategic procurement management: towards and entrepreneurial and contractual theory of the firm. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 2(1), 57-70.
  • 19. Craighead, W., Blackhurst, J., Rungtusanatham, M.J., and Handfield, R.B. (2007). The Severity of Supply Chain Disruptions: Design Characteristics and Mitigation Capabilities. Decision Sciences, 38(1), 131-156.
  • 20. Daft, R.L. (1986). Organization Theory and Design. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
  • 21. Das, T.K., and Teng, B.-S. (2003). Partner Analysis and Alliance Performance. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 19, 279-308.
  • 22. Doménech, T., and Davies, M. (2011). The role of embeddedness in industrial symbiosis networks: Phases in the evolution of industrial symbiosis networks. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(5), 281-296.
  • 23. Dyer, J.H., and Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 345-367.
  • 24. Dyer, J.H., and Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
  • 25. Everett, M.G., and Borgatti, S.P. (1998). Analyzing clique overlap. Connections, 21(1), 49-61.
  • 26. Ford, D., Gadde, L.-E., Håkansson, H., Snehota, I. (2003). Managing Business Relationships. London: Whiley.
  • 27. Foss, N.J. (1999). Networks, capabilities, and competitive advantage. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 15,1-15.
  • 28. Gadde, L.E., Hakansson, H. (2001). Supply Network Strategies. Chichester: Wiley.
  • 29. Gnyawali, D.R., and Madhavan, R. (2001). Cooperative Networks and Competitive Dynamics: a Structural Embeddedness Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 431-445.
  • 30. Goerzen, A., and Beamish, P.W. (2005). The Effect of Alliance Network Diversity on Multinational Enterprise Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 333-354.
  • 31. Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
  • 32. Gulati, R. (1999). Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397-420.
  • 33. Hakansson, H., and Ford, D. (2002). How should companies interact in business networks. Journal of Business Research, 55(2), 133-139.
  • 34. Hines, P., Jones, O. (1996). Achieving mutual trust. Purchasing & Supply Management, January, 4.
  • 35. Hoffmann, W.H. (2007). Strategies for managing a portfolio of alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8), 827-856.
  • 36. Hogarth-Scott, S., Dapiran, G.P. (1997). Shifting category management relationships in the food distribution channels in the UK and Australia. Management Decision, 35(4), 310-318.
  • 37. Huxham, Ch. (1996). Creating Collaborative Advantage. Sage Publications.
  • 38. Jarillo, J.C. (1986). On strategic networks. Research Paper, 112. Barcelona: IESE.
  • 39. Johansson, B. and Quigley, J.M. (2004). Agglomeration and networks in spatial economies. Regional Science, 83(1), 165-176.
  • 40. Johnsen, R.E., and Ford, D. (2006). Interaction capability development of smaller suppliers in relationships with larger customers. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(8), 1002-1015.
  • 41. Johnsen, T., Wynstra, F., Zheng, J., Harland, C. and Lamming, R.C. (2000). Networking Activities in Supply Networks. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 8 (2). 161-182.
  • 42. Joshi, A.W., Campbell, A.J. (2003). Effect of Environmental Dynamism on Relational Governance in Manufacturer-Supplier Relationships: A Contingent Framework and an Empirical Test. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 31(2), 176-188.
  • 43. Kenis, P., and Knoke, D. (2002). How organizational field networks shape interorganizational tie-formation rates. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 275-293.
  • 44. Kim, D.Y. (2014). Understanding supplier structural embeddedness: A social network perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 32(5), 219-231.
  • 45. Kim, Y., Choi, T.Y., Yan, T., and Dooley, K. (2011). Structural investigation of supply networks: A social network analysis approach. Journal of Operations Management, 29(3), 194-211.
  • 46. Kumar, N., Stern, L.W., and Steenkamp, J.-B. (1995). The effects of supplier fairness on vulnerable resellers. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 54-65.
  • 47. Lado, A.A., Paulraj, A., and Chen, I.J. (2011). Customer Focus, Supply-Chain Relational Capabilities and Performance: Evidence from U.S. Manufacturing Industries. International Journal of Logistics Management, 22(2), 202-221.
  • 48. Lee, C., Lee, K., and Pennings, J.M. (2001). Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 615-640.
  • 49. Lei, H.S., Huang, C.H. (2014). Geographic clustering, network relationships and competitive advantage: Two industrial clusters in Taiwan. Management Decision, 52(5), 852-871.
  • 50. Liang, S., Feng, Y., and Xu, M. (2015). Structure of the Global Virtual Carbon Network: Revealing Important Sectors and Communities for Emission Reduction. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19, 307-320.
  • 51. Lui, S.S., and Ngo, H. (2004). The role of trust and contractual safeguards on cooperation in non-equity alliances. Journal of Management, 30, 471-485.
  • 52. Mackintosh, M. (1992). Partnership: issues of policy and negotiation. Local Economy, 7(3), 210-224.
  • 53. McEvily, B., and Zaheer, A. (1999). Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1133-1156.
  • 54. Morgan, R.M., and Hunt, S. (1994). The commitment trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20-38.
  • 55. O'Toole, L.J. Jr. (1997). Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-based Agendas in Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 57(1), 45-52.
  • 56. Palin, P (2013). Supply Chain Resilience: Diversity + Self-organization = Adaptation. Homeland Security Affairs, 9, Article 14.
  • 57. Pathak, S., Dilts, D., and Biswas, G. (2007). On the evolutionary dynamics of supply network topologies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(4), 662-672.
  • 58. Peterson, R. (1995). Relational Marketing and the Consumer. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23, 2478-281.
  • 59. Pitt, L., van der Merwe, R., Berthon, P., Salehi-Sangari, E., and Caruana, A. (2006). Global alliance networks: a comparison of biotech SMEs in Sweden and Australia. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(5), 600-610.
  • 60. Polidoro, F., Ahuja, G., and Mitchell, W. (2011). When the social structure overshadows competitive incentives: the effects of network embeddedness on joint venture dissolution. Academy Management Journal, 54(1), 203-223.
  • 61. Rigby, C., Day, M., Forrester, P., and Burnett, J. (2000). Agile supply: rethinking systems thinking, systems practice. International Journal of Agile Management Systems, 2(3), 178-186.
  • 62. Ritter, T., and Gemunden, H.G. (2003). Network competence: its impact on innovation success and its antecedents. Journal of Business Research, 56(9), 745-755.
  • 63. Rowley, T., Behrens, D., and Krackhardt, D. (2000). Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 369-386.
  • 64. Scott, J. (1991). Social Network Analysis - A Handbook. London: Sage.
  • 65. Sheppard, B.H., and Sherman, D.M. (1998). The grammars of trust: A model and general implications. Academy of Management Review, 23, 422-437.
  • 66. Spekman, R.E., Kamauff, J.W. Jr, Myhr, N. (1998). An empirical investigation into supply chain management: a perspective on partnerships. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 3(2), 53-67.
  • 67. Stank, T.P., Goldsby, T.J., and Vickery, S.K. 1999. Effect of Service Supplier Performance on Satisfaction and Loyalty of Store Managers in the Fast Food Industry. Journal of Operations Management, 17(4), 429-447.
  • 68. Świerczek, A. (2018). The inverted U-shaped relationship between the network profile and the competitive advantage of supply chains: Chasing the perfect network setting. International Journal of Logistics Management, 29(4), 1379-1400.
  • 69. Terpend, R., and Ashenbaum, B. (2012). The Intersection of Power, Trust and Supplier Network Size: Implications for Supplier Performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48, 52-77.
  • 70. Ulaga, W. (2001). Customer value in business markets: an agenda for inquiry. Industrial Marketing Management, 30(4), 315-319.
  • 71. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35-67.
  • 72. Walter, A., Auer, M., and Ritter, T. (2006). The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 541-567.
  • 73. Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. (2004). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York-Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 74. Wilding, R., Humphries, A.S. (2006). Understanding collaborative supply chain relationships through the application of the Williamson organisational failure framework. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 36(4), 309-329.
  • 75. Wincent, J. (2008). An exchange approach on firm cooperative orientation and outcomes of strategic multilateral network participants. Group & Organization Management, 33, 303-329.
  • 76. Wincent, J., Anokhin, S., Örtqvist, D., and Autio, E. (2010). Quality Meets Structure: Generalized Reciprocity and Firm-Level Advantage in Strategic Networks. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 597-624.
  • 77. Xu, Z., Lin, J., and Lin, D. (2008). Networking and innovation in SMEs: evidence from Guangdong Province, China. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(4), 788-801.
  • 78. Zacharia, Z.G, Nix, N.W., and Lusch, R.F. (2009). An analysis of supply chain collaborations and their effect on performance outcomes. Journal of Business Logistics, 30(2), 101-123.
  • 79. Zaheer, A., Gözübüyük, R., and Milanov, H. (2010). It's the connections: The network perspective in interorganizational research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(1), 62-77.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.